The article did mention an unnamed person in HR that was still there that people felt was an enabler. Quote-retweets of the article directly named Gayle in reference to that passage.

I also saw former employees saying the same thing to the point of saying, "if you ever worked there, you know who, but if you really need a hint, "G". So...yeah.

The article did mention an unnamed person in HR that was still there that people felt was an enabler. Quote-retweets of the article directly named Gayle in reference to that passage.

Well, this would explain.

HR, of course, works in the company's interest as opposed to the employees' interest, so she might've been pressured by the board to act that way in the past. Maybe, maybe not. Hopefully the new head of HR will keep these 'new values' in mind.

I'm wondering why this has happened. The exposé seemed to imply that most of the abusers had already been let go… and Bungie had been taking the issue seriously for years now…

Perhaps there is still work to do.