Also, if you are first and discover a new planet you are given credit for others to see. So if I land on Planet Levi I will be told he found it. There will be no extra information like all of the sinks are clogged with the hair of a wild man. Can't have everything.

-Hedge.

One of my favorite games, Just Cause 2, makes the same tradeoff the article talks about. It's not procedurally generated, but it does make sacrifices by having some repetitive elements (all the trees look the same, most villages are very similar, etc.) in order to gain a truly enormous world. And while I'm always aware of that while playing the game, I can't say that it's ever really taken away from the fun.

Well it is the very first reveal and at an awful awards show, not a game that has been public knowledge for over a year.

Anyway it's a space exploration shooter from what I saw.
It's an indie game made by a really small team, by the Joe Danger guys.

On the bottom of their homepage under their list of projects is this:

"Project Skyscraper
Release: A long time from now
This is our secret project. Someday we’ll even get time to work on it. Joe Danger is a lovely quirky little house that we have handcrafted. It’s the best thing we have ever done. Our next game is a skyscraper. It’s where everything has been building."

Probably referencing No Man's Sky, and kind of a cool nod to it if you ask me.

Anyway it's a space exploration shooter from what I saw.
It's an indie game made by a really small team, by the Joe Danger guys.

And of course, any game where you can take off from the ground and enter orbit must be halfway-decent!

Game looks pretty sweet. Curious to see how much you can do it.

Why would you even want to leave the cockpit, dude? :P