Just saw Star Wars *NO SP* (Off-Topic)
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 03:58 (3266 days ago)
edited by Avateur, Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:36
Fantastic movie. Ladies and gentlemen, it is officially not the prequels. Rejoice! Oh, and go see it. Hell, if you're even reading this, you fucked up. Get out of here. Go. There are showings going on that haven't even started yet in all time zones!
Edit: Btw, there's nothing after the credits (to save you all some time if you don't want to wait).
Just saw Revenant
by Cody Miller , Music of the Spheres - Never Forgot, Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:00 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
It's good, but very flashy and in your face in terms of technique. At times, super tense and immersive as a result. At other times, distracting and pretentious.
Just played Halo: Reach
by UnrealCh13f , San Luis Obispo, CA, Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:01 (3266 days ago) @ Cody Miller
Will never think about Halo the same way again.
Just played Halo: Reach
by cheapLEY , Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:06 (3266 days ago) @ UnrealCh13f
Will never think about Halo the same way again.
Care to elaborate? Reach is my favorite Halo game, but I haven't played it since probably around six months or so after release.
I've seen posts that it's actually not running very well on Xbox One. Any truth to that?
Just played Halo: Reach
by UnrealCh13f , San Luis Obispo, CA, Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:58 (3266 days ago) @ cheapLEY
edited by UnrealCh13f, Friday, December 18, 2015, 05:04
Care to elaborate? Reach is my favorite Halo game, but I haven't played it since probably around six months or so after release.
It was basically a nod to Cody's Halo Reach is Not Canon campaign he had going for a while on HBO a few years back. He brought up some interesting points that made people "never think about Halo the same way again."
It was also pretty good timing considering the Backwards Compatible version went out today.
I've seen posts that it's actually not running very well on Xbox One. Any truth to that?
Few frame rate drops here and there. Apparently a lot more noticeable in Campaign mode, but Multiplayer mode is a bit more stable.
Eh, it's emulation. Can't be perfect, but definitely should be tweaked down the road. :)
Just played Halo: Reach
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Friday, December 18, 2015, 06:38 (3266 days ago) @ cheapLEY
edited by Ragashingo, Friday, December 18, 2015, 06:43
I've seen posts that it's actually not running very well on Xbox One. Any truth to that?
Just finished Winter Contingency. It ran ok but maybe not quite as well as on a 360. It's been a while since I've played it so it's hard to tell what it should be like. I felt I was getting some minor slowdown in places with a lot of enemies, there was a very brief pop in the audio every time a checkpoint saved, and there was a couple instances of texture pop-in that I don't think are present on the 360. (When Jorge was talking with the girl at the relay after the battle his chest piece briefly didn't have it's full resolution texture, for instance.)
Was it perfect? Nah. Was it playable and fun? Yep.
And, dang, Bungie did a great job with the setting and setup back then. Sure the whole game has a kind of last gen sheen on it now but the animations are good, the vaguely "open world" nature of the first level still felt big and impressive with the mountains rising above everything. The skybox is still amazing. Oh, and the Spartans look like Spartans instead of 343i wannabes... :)
Just played Halo: Reach
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Friday, December 18, 2015, 14:57 (3266 days ago) @ cheapLEY
Noticed a little bit of stutter and some odd texture stuff. Look at Jun's face in the opening cutscene--weird.
Love the game. Was kind of hoping it would be better than the original (Mass Effect was), but Bungie probably did a good job of maximizing the hardware, so it's understandable if emulation introduces a few issues.
About Star Wars--will see it Monday. It's going to be a long weekend.
Just played Halo: Reach
by uberfoop , Seattle-ish, Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:15 (3266 days ago) @ cheapLEY
edited by uberfoop, Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:22
I've seen posts that it's actually not running very well on Xbox One. Any truth to that?
Yes.
Complex battles spike substantially worse than they do on 360, and the game is experiencing constant stutters almost everywhere. Audio can stutter at checkpoints or in battles when the game is under high load. Texture streaming also seems to be worse than in the 360 version.
Rain splashes are gone.
Some large-scale transparencies are too powerful/opaque.
For instance, the game uses a transparent cylinder for a subtle background "rain streaking" effect, but in the XB1 version you can see that it's a big cylinder. It's way too visible as smeary fake distance rain, and if you look up, it looks like the sky is a weird vortex thing.
It's not just rain, things like the Spire dome and the green space tendrils on LNoS are also punched way up.
There are also some lighting quirks. For instance, the New Alexandria opening cutscene has bugged shadows in the pelican, and this door on LNoS isn't supposed to have streaked illumination on this side:
Just listened to Goodbye Yellow Brick Road.
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:17 (3266 days ago) @ UnrealCh13f
That move from Funeral for a Friend into Love Lies Bleeding is probably the single greatest transition in rock and roll.
Maybe Travelin' Man/Beautiful Loser is close, but holy moly.
+1
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Friday, December 18, 2015, 14:52 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
- No text -
Reach is Bae
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Friday, December 18, 2015, 15:26 (3266 days ago) @ UnrealCh13f
Incredible game in virtually every way. My favorite in the franchise by a long shot :)
Reach is Bae
by Korny , Dalton, Ga. US. Earth, Sol System, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 07:19 (3265 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
Incredible game in virtually every way. My favorite in the franchise by a long shot :)
Really was the pinnacle of Halo in every way. The armors, the redesigned Elites that looked menacing, the varied vehicle and weapon feel, map design, encounters, File share, Invasion, Theater mode... If only 343 gave us a 1080p version of that...
Preach it!
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 10:53 (3265 days ago) @ Korny
- No text -
Reach is Bae
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 14:35 (3265 days ago) @ Korny
Incredible game in virtually every way. My favorite in the franchise by a long shot :)
Really was the pinnacle of Halo in every way. The armors, the redesigned Elites that looked menacing, the varied vehicle and weapon feel, map design, encounters, File share, Invasion, Theater mode... If only 343 gave us a 1080p version of that...
Yeah, 1080p with a smoother frame rate (a rock solid 30fps would be great)... a guy can dream :)
While we're dreaming, the ability to do all of this stuff in-game would be pretty sweet!
Just saw Revenant
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:16 (3266 days ago) @ Cody Miller
Interesting. It's on my list of things to see. I haven't seen anything since Ant-Man until just now with Star Wars, but I have a much more freed up schedule to get some movies in during the next few weeks.
Just saw Star Wars
by j41m3z , Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:01 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
Thanks for the spoiler warning. Now I know it's not going to suck.
Me and my sister are going to see it at 10 AM!
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:20 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
$5 movie tickets can't be beat.
I'm really excited because I haven't even seen a TRAILER. I know nothing about the film other than the poster. Some guy spoiled the movie for me in a hilarious way the other day, but because I had literally no idea what he was talking about because I know nothing about the movie, I've completely forgotten it.
Me and my sister are going to see it at 10 AM!
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:26 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
$5 movie tickets can't be beat.
I'm really excited because I haven't even seen a TRAILER. I know nothing about the film other than the poster. Some guy spoiled the movie for me in a hilarious way the other day, but because I had literally no idea what he was talking about because I know nothing about the movie, I've completely forgotten it.
Have fun! I had managed to avoid spoilers completely. I did see the trailers and a few commercials, and I did make some predictions based off of them (some came true, others didn't, and some are to be determined potentially in future movies), but I really enjoyed this movie. Intense parts, emotional parts, funny parts, and with this much hype that I've felt for the past year (and the absolutely obnoxious, though cautious, amounts of hype that I've experienced in this past month), I'm very happy to say that the movie lived up to the hype for me. I'm not disappointed in the slightest.
Me and my sister are going to see it at 10 AM!
by bluerunner , Music City, Friday, December 18, 2015, 05:15 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
$5 movie tickets can't be beat.
$8 for 3D Imax tickets for me and Lil'Blue. I haven't even told him I got them. It's a 10am show, so I'm telling him I'm taking him to the dentist.
Our family of 6 is hitting the 9 AM show. Should be great!
by slycrel , Friday, December 18, 2015, 06:10 (3266 days ago) @ bluerunner
- No text -
The emotional rollercoaster is strong in this one
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Friday, December 18, 2015, 07:29 (3266 days ago) @ bluerunner
- No text -
OMG. Great move.
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 08:11 (3266 days ago) @ bluerunner
Make sure you even it out by telling him to pack his stuff up and that you're going to Disney World for a weekend, then bring him to Sears for new school clothes.
Paging bluerunner
by Avateur , Sunday, December 20, 2015, 01:43 (3265 days ago) @ bluerunner
So how did it go? :D
Paging bluerunner
by bluerunner , Music City, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 12:35 (3264 days ago) @ Avateur
So how did it go? :D
We're out on the family farm in Arkansas for Christmas this weekend. The tickets are for Tuesday.
I should have gotten some pictures yesterday. My parents' front yard is about 20 acres. We were teeing off and driving golf balls from end to end. It actually takes 2 drives to get all the way across.
Success
by bluerunner , Music City, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 13:38 (3262 days ago) @ Avateur
"This isn't where my dentist is"
"I'm taking you to a new dentist"
"What's his name?"
"Kylo Ren"
We got through the ticket line, picked up 3D glasses, and walked into the theater. "Wait, this isn't the dentist office."
Success
by Claude Errera , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 17:05 (3262 days ago) @ bluerunner
"This isn't where my dentist is"
"I'm taking you to a new dentist"
"What's his name?"
"Kylo Ren"We got through the ticket line, picked up 3D glasses, and walked into the theater. "Wait, this isn't the dentist office."
lol - the 3D glasses didn't clue him in first? :)
Success
by bluerunner , Music City, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 17:15 (3262 days ago) @ Claude Errera
"This isn't where my dentist is"
"I'm taking you to a new dentist"
"What's his name?"
"Kylo Ren"We got through the ticket line, picked up 3D glasses, and walked into the theater. "Wait, this isn't the dentist office."
lol - the 3D glasses didn't clue him in first? :)
I kept it up as long as I could. The dentist office was in the back, and the glasses were for the x-ray. When the trailers started, he turned to me and said "I'm starting to think we're not really going to the dentist."
Success
by Claude Errera , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 17:19 (3262 days ago) @ bluerunner
"This isn't where my dentist is"
"I'm taking you to a new dentist"
"What's his name?"
"Kylo Ren"We got through the ticket line, picked up 3D glasses, and walked into the theater. "Wait, this isn't the dentist office."
lol - the 3D glasses didn't clue him in first? :)
I kept it up as long as I could. The dentist office was in the back, and the glasses were for the x-ray. When the trailers started, he turned to me and said "I'm starting to think we're not really going to the dentist."
You're both adorable.
Success
by bluerunner , Music City, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 17:50 (3262 days ago) @ Claude Errera
A few years ago my dad mailed my uncle his Christmas present before Thanksgiving. He paid to have it overnighted from Arkansas to Florida, and had instructions attached to the box:
-Don't open until Christmas morning.
-Refrigerate immediately.
-At least once a day rotate the box vertically in your refrigerator.
-On Christmas morning, make a pot of coffee, open, and enjoy.
For a month my uncle diligently rotated the box every morning. On Christmas morning he made a pot of coffee, opened the box, and took out the trailer hitch cover my dad got him for Christmas.
Success
by Claude Errera , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 18:36 (3262 days ago) @ bluerunner
A few years ago my dad mailed my uncle his Christmas present before Thanksgiving. He paid to have it overnighted from Arkansas to Florida, and had instructions attached to the box:
-Don't open until Christmas morning.
-Refrigerate immediately.
-At least once a day rotate the box vertically in your refrigerator.
-On Christmas morning, make a pot of coffee, open, and enjoy.For a month my uncle diligently rotated the box every morning. On Christmas morning he made a pot of coffee, opened the box, and took out the trailer hitch cover my dad got him for Christmas.
I love your whole family.
From a distance.
LOL!
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 19:47 (3262 days ago) @ Claude Errera
- No text -
Success
by Avateur , Wednesday, December 23, 2015, 01:09 (3262 days ago) @ bluerunner
That is ridiculously awesome! And very funny! What did you both think of the movie? Or was the movie a disappointment because the dentist hype was too real?
Success
by bluerunner , Music City, Wednesday, December 23, 2015, 04:48 (3261 days ago) @ Avateur
He loved it. I thought it was good. Finn was great. Rey was kinda meh, but I think I just didn't care for the actress. I wish there had been more of Poe. It felt like they're setting him up to be the next Han, but he didn't get much development. Overall, it laid a good foundation for the next movies and I'm looking forward to more.
Just saw Star Wars *NO SP*
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:21 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
I'm really looking forward to it. I'm hearing almost nothing but good things so far. Thankfully, nothing specific - no one in my circles has been a spoiler jerk yet. Thanks for continuing that trend. :)
I hope it's still Star Wars.
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:27 (3266 days ago) @ stabbim
I am a minority, but I like the prequels. I thought they were good and they were very Star Wars. Wipes, clunky dialogue, awful acting, all hallmarks of Star Wars.
I'm worried that if they make the movie too good it won't be right and I won't like it. That said, JJ Abrams is the guy I would have picked to direct this film. I think he would also be good on Indiana Jones if Spielberg ever retires.
"Good news!"
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Thursday, December 24, 2015, 05:12 (3260 days ago) @ Funkmon
- No text -
A question.
by cheapLEY , Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:21 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
The biggest complaint I've seen about it is that it mimics A New Hope a bit too closely and relies too heavily on throwbacks and fan service rather than taking any chances and trying to stand on its own. Would you say there's truth to that?
I've unfortunately seen some spoilers (I actually don't mind too much; I generally don't really care about spoilers. The fun comes from the journey for me, not in any big reveals).
So, knowing that, it certainly seems like it could be true, but I'm not sure that's a bad thing. Primarily, I think this movie was about getting the fans interested in Star Wars again, and showing that it can be good again, so relying a bit too much on echoing the original trilogy is the safe bet to make.
Answer *sorta SP*
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:36 (3266 days ago) @ cheapLEY
edited by Avateur, Friday, December 18, 2015, 04:54
The biggest complaint I've seen about it is that it mimics A New Hope a bit too closely and relies too heavily on throwbacks and fan service rather than taking any chances and trying to stand on its own. Would you say there's truth to that?
To an extent. There are parallels. Lucas used to talk about how Star Wars (the prequels in particular with regards to the originals) are like a poem, how there's a rhyme/echo to some things even if they aren't identical. I'd say that Abrams respected that and did that in certain ways. He did NOT do it like with Star Trek Into Darkness where it was so ridiculously close to Wrath of Khan as to be laughable in many respects.
The way it was done in this movie actually works. It pays homage to a lot from the past, provides some wonderful nostalgia, and also helps to further ground this universe based on what happened previously so that it has the opportunity to grow in the future (I hope). The best and most fantastic parts of this movie are the new characters, their characterization and interactions, and the writing in general. Abrams also isn't directing Episode VIII. Combining all of these things should allow the next movie to really grow and go off on its own and try new things (I hope, again).
TL;DR:
It does manage to stand on its own in many ways, primarily due to the new characters and what's going on with them. At the same time, characters from the past definitely help to progress and ground certain things. I think this movie will stand the test of time (and is so far beyond the prequels already).
So, knowing that, it certainly seems like it could be true, but I'm not sure that's a bad thing. Primarily, I think this movie was about getting the fans interested in Star Wars again, and showing that it can be good again, so relying a bit too much on echoing the original trilogy is the safe bet to make.
A lot of this, but it's not as heavily reliant on the past as you'd think. I guess the questions become "how much" and "in whose opinion(s)" did it rely too much? Is 50/50 okay? 70/30? I think it's also a great jumping on point for people new to Star Wars, too.
From a StarWars noobie perspective
by Earendil, Friday, December 18, 2015, 17:03 (3266 days ago) @ cheapLEY
No, I'm not the noobie. I'm insulted you even htought that.
My wife has seen the originals maybe once in their entirety, and not for a long time. She saw the new one last night with me and enjoyed it. She missed a few jokes, but missing "a few" is hardly missing much, as the situational comedy was frequent and good.
From my fan boy perspective, it was a great throwback to the old ones, and in such a good way that I want to go back and watch them again in a way that I haven't wanted to in a long time.
My thoughts (definitely SP)
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Monday, December 21, 2015, 21:25 (3263 days ago) @ Earendil
From my fan boy perspective, it was a great throwback to the old ones, and in such a good way that I want to go back and watch them again in a way that I haven't wanted to in a long time.
I am actually literally doing that right now. And as soon as I'm done, I'm going back to a theater to see episode VII again.
This movie absolutely nailed it, for me. I think I'm more or less in agreement with Funkmon and Avateur, in that there is definitely some strong resemblance between this and the first film, but that is NOT a negative thing. It's clear to me that any similarities are there intentionally, but not as a ripoff or to be lazy. Rather, they're trying to ground the new trilogy in the existing universe (tied more strongly to the original trilogy than the prequels, I'd say), probably as a jumping-off point to totally new stuff.
While I was actually sitting there watching it I didn't care about any of that. I was just grinning the whole time, enjoying the nostalgia. But the more I think back on it now, the more I'm sure that I like the direction things are going.
The new characters in particular have a lot of potential. Rey is really interesting to me because I can't quite tell whether she will end up dark or light. On the surface she's obviously one of the good guys, but in her more intense scenes there's often a subtle hint that she's drawing on anger as much as anything else (except toward the end of the forest fight - she's very zen there). Of course, I don't know if that's because they're actually hinting at a darker path for her, or just because she's had no Jedi training yet. Kylo Ren's potential to turn is more obvious, I think. He could still come back.
I could write down things I liked all evening.
An answer (maybe kinda spoiler maybe)
by SonofMacPhisto , Saturday, December 19, 2015, 22:59 (3265 days ago) @ cheapLEY
The biggest complaint I've seen about it is that it mimics A New Hope a bit too closely and relies too heavily on throwbacks and fan service rather than taking any chances and trying to stand on its own. Would you say there's truth to that?
Think of it like this, "history doesn't repeat itself but it rhymes."
Works really well, I think. Especially with some of the stuff that shows up and how the Force is a quasi-religious kind of thing but also real.
A question.
by Cody Miller , Music of the Spheres - Never Forgot, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 21:30 (3264 days ago) @ cheapLEY
The biggest complaint I've seen about it is that it mimics A New Hope a bit too closely and relies too heavily on throwbacks and fan service rather than taking any chances and trying to stand on its own. Would you say there's truth to that?
That's true… but I completely understand WHY that was so. I agree, I'd much rather have something new that you remember fondly, rather than something that simply recaptures the fondness you had for something else.
After the prequels, people needed to connect with these new films for them to work and be successful. Throwbacks are an easy way to do that. Maybe VIII and IX will move us into new territory. At least, I hope so.
In this case it's not BAD, it's just very SAFE. Now that we're successful, it's time to be bold and take a few risks.
Stuck at home
by CougRon, Auburn, WA, USA, Friday, December 18, 2015, 06:04 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
I can't drive so I can't see it until someone takes pity on me and takes me. Might not be until my brother visits for Christmas .
Sounds like a good Christmas present!
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 06:15 (3266 days ago) @ CougRon
It'll be worth the wait. When you get there, I look forward to hearing your thoughts. While it may not be a perfect movie, I really enjoyed it, and I'd love to expand upon some things I said in reply to cheapLEY. I'm sure that'll happen sooner or later as more people get to see it (and this thread/others pop up and expand). I'm letting a lot of it sink in for now. :D
Have you tried running?
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 08:54 (3266 days ago) @ CougRon
- No text -
I'm pretty sure he's not supposed to run...?
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Friday, December 18, 2015, 10:17 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
- No text -
Why don't you just try walking on your hands?
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 17:52 (3266 days ago) @ ZackDark
Then you could use your feet for high fives and eating sandwiches. You know, the important stuff.
Why don't you just try walking on your hands?
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:13 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
The real question: would you gladly pay to see it again?
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Friday, December 18, 2015, 10:54 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
I have a from-another-state friend coming over and our group decided to watch together with him on the weekend after x-mas. Thing is, most of them (including that dude) have already seen it. Should I wait or is it totally cool to see it twice?
Yep
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Friday, December 18, 2015, 13:57 (3266 days ago) @ ZackDark
Seeing it again Sunday, and then again next Tuesday
That might be up to the person
by Earendil, Friday, December 18, 2015, 17:06 (3266 days ago) @ ZackDark
The movie certainly isn't so deep that you'll "get more of of it" watching it a second time. I also don't think the action is "best I've ever seen" such that the reply value is good. However I think the humor will hold up well, and I don't think it'll be tedious or boring. I'd be willing to see it a second time if the opportunity fell in my lap. I'm not actively seeking a way to see it again the way I did with TLOTR.
Yes
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 17:40 (3266 days ago) @ ZackDark
I'll be seeing it again next Wednesday, actually! And again after that! Lots of people who want me to go with them. Absolutely worth seeing again. I wonder how I'll feel after the repeated viewings!
I already have.
by Monochron, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 20:04 (3265 days ago) @ ZackDark
And paid for a friend to see it with me just for the experience!
We're going again tomorrow. So, yes?
by SonofMacPhisto , Saturday, December 19, 2015, 22:52 (3265 days ago) @ ZackDark
- No text -
Absolutely
by JDQuackers , McMurray, PA, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 01:09 (3265 days ago) @ ZackDark
- No text -
Yes indeed.
by Quirel, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 04:53 (3262 days ago) @ ZackDark
- No text -
Yes, already making plans to do so
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 04:58 (3262 days ago) @ ZackDark
- No text -
Showing Sammy the Star Wars films for the first time...
by Korny , Dalton, Ga. US. Earth, Sol System, Friday, December 18, 2015, 17:17 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
Went the extra mile to get the Despecialized editions too. She really liked the first one, even though she fell asleep after the Death Star escape. :P
It's weird. I never liked the movies, but watching the Despecialized editions actually did improve my experience re-watching A New Hope. Something about watching it without an annoyed scowl or raised eyebrow gave me a better appreciation for the film, and the way that the world and effects were pulled off given the limitations of the technology at the time (especially with Luke's speeder). And to think that folks had to work hard to restore that charming hokeyness... I respect those folks.
Knowing a lot of behind the scenes stuff helped the experience too.
We won't be watching the prequels, but I can't wait to see the new one after we finish RotJ,
Showing Sammy the Star Wars films for the first time...
by dogcow , Hiding from Bob, in the vent core., Friday, December 18, 2015, 17:58 (3266 days ago) @ Korny
Went the extra mile to get the Despecialized editions too. She really liked the first one, even though she fell asleep after the Death Star escape. :P
Good job. Well done sir. When I shared Star Wars with my kids I showed them the most true & original version I could acquire. ;-)
We won't be watching the prequels, but I can't wait to see the new one after we finish RotJ,
If you do watch 2 & 3 between 5 & 6. Ignore 1.
There's also the no cheese edits that can be found on youtube. I have a coworker who keeps suggesting I watch those 'remixes' of the movies.
Showing Sammy the Star Wars films for the first time...
by Blackt1g3r , Login is from an untrusted domain in MN, Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:00 (3266 days ago) @ dogcow
Went the extra mile to get the Despecialized editions too. She really liked the first one, even though she fell asleep after the Death Star escape. :P
Good job. Well done sir. When I shared Star Wars with my kids I showed them the most true & original version I could acquire. ;-)
We won't be watching the prequels, but I can't wait to see the new one after we finish RotJ,
If you do watch 2 & 3 between 5 & 6. Ignore 1.There's also the no cheese edits that can be found on youtube. I have a coworker who keeps suggesting I watch those 'remixes' of the movies.
Has anyone actually watched them in this order? I'm considering it at some point, but before 7 I'm just planning on rewatching the originals.
Showing Sammy the Star Wars films for the first time...
by dogcow , Hiding from Bob, in the vent core., Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:20 (3266 days ago) @ Blackt1g3r
If you do watch 2 & 3 between 5 & 6. Ignore 1.
There's also the no cheese edits that can be found on youtube. I have a coworker who keeps suggesting I watch those 'remixes' of the movies.
Has anyone actually watched them in this order? I'm considering it at some point, but before 7 I'm just planning on rewatching the originals.
If my kids were closer to 11 & 14 I would have, but since they're only 4 & 7 I didn't. I think episode 3 is just too dark to be showing them with the killing of the young and innocent, & the cruelty of leaving someone to a horrible slow and painful death at the end. Add to that the head of a certain character rolling to the feet of his child in episode 2, and they're just too much for my kids at the moment.
Showing Sammy the Star Wars films for the first time...
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:29 (3266 days ago) @ dogcow
Episode VII also got the PG-13 rating, and there's definitely outright murder/killing and some pretty intense violence at certain points throughout the movie. Just a heads up if you're planning on taking them to this one.
Showing Sammy the Star Wars films for the first time...
by dogcow , Hiding from Bob, in the vent core., Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:32 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
Episode VII also got the PG-13 rating, and there's definitely outright murder/killing and some pretty intense violence at certain points throughout the movie. Just a heads up if you're planning on taking them to this one.
I'm going to have to see it first. Maybe the 7yo, not the 4yo.
7 should be fine.
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:43 (3266 days ago) @ dogcow
- No text -
I don't know why people give the remastered versions crap.
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:50 (3266 days ago) @ Korny
With the exception of the song and dance number in Return and the added Jabba scene in the original, I think everything they did improved the movies, and it's not close. Simple things, like having Leia move while walking around in the window of Cloud City where before it was just a still shot, or adding in great atmosphere where before there were just corridors there. It's all great, IMO. Except, again, those two aforementioned exceptions.
I saw the movies first as the originals, and my parents taped them from TV. When the remastered versions came out in theaters, I saw those too. I have the original versions, the 1997 versions, and the 2000s versions. Taken as a whole, I think the 1997 editions are the best. If it was me, I'd do theatrical Star Wars (because of the Jabba scene), 1997 Empire and 1997 Return. Easy.
I don't know why people give the remastered versions crap.
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:14 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
I don't understand how you can't understand it. It's not that the changes are always awful it's a little more basic than that: it changes what we loved.
If it had been changes that were fixing some mistakes or problems (like the see through cockpits on Hoth) nobody would complain. But adding in modern CG in a movie that relied 90% on practical effects, plus actually CHANGING certain scenes (Greedo shooting first, Vader yelling when killing the Emperor) is so incredibly weird and unnecessary. And last of all: I don't think anyone would have nearly as big of an issue with it if they actually made the original version AVAILABLE, which I think is most people's problem with all the changes.
I don't know.
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:46 (3266 days ago) @ Xenos
I don't understand how you can't understand it. It's not that the changes are always awful it's a little more basic than that: it changes what we loved.
If it had been changes that were fixing some mistakes or problems (like the see through cockpits on Hoth) nobody would complain. But adding in modern CG in a movie that relied 90% on practical effects, plus actually CHANGING certain scenes (Greedo shooting first, Vader yelling when killing the Emperor) is so incredibly weird and unnecessary. And last of all: I don't think anyone would have nearly as big of an issue with it if they actually made the original version AVAILABLE, which I think is most people's problem with all the changes.
I don't know why because it's not 1996 with the movies out of print. People here give Cody shit for not liking that Destiny is forever changed, but it's something a huge number of Star Wars fans do constantly in regards to these special editions. Plus, you can buy the theatrical editions. It isn't hard.
I understand not liking the changes, which is no problem. It doesn't sufficiently explain to me the derision I see online and IRL, today, though I would understand it were we on usenet in 1999.
If it's something you loved, and you can't get it anymore, I understand. However, I see too often people looking at them with the attitude of "It's different, therefore it's worse!" I can fall into this as well, it's simple...but the talk by Star Wars nerds of the theatrical movies being so obviously superior is absurd. I mean, it's taken for granted, for some reason, and thrown in casually just as a dig at those editions, like "haha look how enlightened I am preferring the original versions." I legitimately do not know why they get the shit they do in the 2010s. Thanks for explaining why you think it is, though. It just doesn't make sense to me.
This is not an attack on Korny, but just a comment on Star Wars fans I talk to in the general populace.
I don't know.
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:48 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
Plus, you can buy the theatrical editions. It isn't hard.
Yes. Yes they are, unless you want to spend $50 per movie. They never even released a proper DVD version of the theatrical editions, only a copy of the laser disc version, which is out of print.
Oh. I have them. Maybe I got lucky?
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:57 (3266 days ago) @ Xenos
edited by Funkmon, Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:00
Details: 6 DVD set, one theatrical, one revised, for each film.
With some research, I see you're right. Holy shit. I'm going to sell these things and get some MOONAAYYY.
I understand now.
Oh. I have them. Maybe I got lucky?
by dogcow , Hiding from Bob, in the vent core., Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:05 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
Details: 6 DVD set, one theatrical, one revised, for each film.
I have the same DVDs (probably). The theatrical versions are terrible, as if they were captured off of the VHS release, and they're ACTUALLY 4x3 that looks like it's in the original aspect ratio, but when you play it on a wide screen it looks horrible because it's really 4x3 and gets stretched to fit the width, or it gets black bars on the sides in addition to the top & bottom. If you're lucky you can mess with your tv settings and get something else (zoom?), but still, it's just terrible quality.
Oh. I have them. Maybe I got lucky?
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:06 (3266 days ago) @ dogcow
Details: 6 DVD set, one theatrical, one revised, for each film.
I have the same DVDs (probably). The theatrical versions are terrible, as if they were captured off of the VHS release, and they're ACTUALLY 4x3 that looks like it's in the original aspect ratio, but when you play it on a wide screen it looks horrible because it's really 4x3 and gets stretched to fit the width, or it gets black bars on the sides in addition to the top & bottom. If you're lucky you can mess with your tv settings and get something else (zoom?), but still, it's just terrible quality.
Which is why you should try and get the Despecialized Edition, it's worth it :)
Oh. I have them. Maybe I got lucky?
by dogcow , Hiding from Bob, in the vent core., Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:08 (3266 days ago) @ Xenos
I have the same DVDs (probably). The theatrical versions are terrible, as if they were captured off of the VHS release, and they're ACTUALLY 4x3 that looks like it's in the original aspect ratio, but when you play it on a wide screen it looks horrible because it's really 4x3 and gets stretched to fit the width, or it gets black bars on the sides in addition to the top & bottom. If you're lucky you can mess with your tv settings and get something else (zoom?), but still, it's just terrible quality.
Which is why you should try and get the Despecialized Edition, it's worth it :)
Despecialized FTW!
Same. Generally not preferable.
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:11 (3266 days ago) @ dogcow
- No text -
Two things
by Monochron, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 20:16 (3265 days ago) @ Funkmon
Plus, you can buy the theatrical editions. It isn't hard.
No you really can't. The closest thing you can buy still has updates. Look into the Despecialized Version online, that's about the closest you can get.
More importantly though, in my opinion, is that those old effects were the award winning work of amazing effect artists. Lucas decided to erase that hard work that represented a pinnacle in effects. When I first saw the movies I remember being honestly impressed at how cool everything looked, even though it was already years old. That was part of the value of the movie and to try to erase what was amazing work is pretty abhorrent.
I don't know why people give the remastered versions crap.
by Cody Miller , Music of the Spheres - Never Forgot, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 16:27 (3265 days ago) @ Funkmon
With the exception of the song and dance number in Return and the added Jabba scene in the original, I think everything they did improved the movies, and it's not close.
No.
The new shots and cutting in the Death Star trench run in a New Hope ruined the perfect pacing and buildup in the original.
I'll watch them both tonight and see what I think.
by Funkmon , Saturday, December 19, 2015, 18:45 (3265 days ago) @ Cody Miller
- No text -
Minus one billion
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 04:36 (3264 days ago) @ Funkmon
I'm going to chalk this one up to the extreme ignorance of youth. If you'd seen the originals as God intended (e.g. 12x in 1977) i'm sure you'd have a different opinion. Lucas changed the fucking story and took very important historic films out of circulation. There's no excuse for it.
Minus one billion
by SonofMacPhisto , Sunday, December 20, 2015, 15:50 (3264 days ago) @ Kermit
I'm going to chalk this one up to the extreme ignorance of youth. If you'd seen the originals as God intended (e.g. 12x in 1977) i'm sure you'd have a different opinion. Lucas changed the fucking story and took very important historic films out of circulation. There's no excuse for it.
Indeed. Han shot first, as God intended.
Minus one billion
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Monday, December 21, 2015, 02:07 (3264 days ago) @ SonofMacPhisto
I'm going to chalk this one up to the extreme ignorance of youth. If you'd seen the originals as God intended (e.g. 12x in 1977) i'm sure you'd have a different opinion. Lucas changed the fucking story and took very important historic films out of circulation. There's no excuse for it.
Indeed. Han shot first, as God intended.
Heh. I'm not going to revive my big debate with Vagueness, but I recently heard two prominent constitutional law professors discuss the legality of Han shooting first. The conclusion: perfectly within his right to self-defense, going all the way back to English common law.
QED
Minus one billion
by Funkmon , Sunday, December 20, 2015, 20:57 (3264 days ago) @ Kermit
I'll chalk this one up to the extreme prejudice and stubbornness of old age. If you had seen the movies with some objectivity (at about the same time, within a couple years of each other) I'm sure you'd have a different opinion.
Doesn't make sense or feel good, does it? It's fine to disagree, but to explain away my ideas as me just being ignorant because of youth is just you not wanting to give them a fair treatment.
I explained I didn't know they were out of circulation because I have them on DVDs, and didn't go searching for them. They were just the DVDs I bought at the store. I understand not liking the new versions, but dismissing differing opinions is silly.
Minus one billion
by Cody Miller , Music of the Spheres - Never Forgot, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 21:22 (3264 days ago) @ Funkmon
edited by Cody Miller, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 21:26
I'll chalk this one up to the extreme prejudice and stubbornness of old age. If you had seen the movies with some objectivity (at about the same time, within a couple years of each other) I'm sure you'd have a different opinion.
I feel like I'm more qualified than most to evaluate things like this objectively.
1. I've studied film history extensively.
2. I'm a literal professional when it comes to making films
3. I love to watch movies.
4. I am not old :-p
Many of the changes you say you like are but surface level details, which do not really have much impact on the story of draw the audience in any more. I am all for cleaning up visible matte lines, fixing matte paintings with incorrect perspective, etc. These fixes are nice, but nobody was really looking at the hallway when Han Luke and Leia were trapped before jumping into the garbage chute and thinking "man, the perspective is off… now I can't connect with the emotion of this scene!"
However many of the changes are not simple harmless fixes, but either significant alterations, pointless scenes or additions that significantly clash aesthetically with the rest of the film.
Every single change that was not simply a surface level detail or technical fix detracted from the films. Every single one. That is not an exaggeration, and it is not nostalgia talking.
Watch the climax in the original theatrical release. It is perhaps the most perfect action sequence ever made. Compare that to the special edition, which adds in different shots, recuts the timing, and in general just loses some of the excitement and tension. Editing is more powerful than you know, and a single simple change can cause a ripple effect to alter the experience significantly.
Surface level details are very easy to look at and say "wow, that looks better!". But there is way more to making a movie than just nice looking shots and technical acumen.
One billion percent right
by narcogen , Andover, Massachusetts, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 22:58 (3264 days ago) @ Cody Miller
- No text -
Minus one billion
by Funkmon , Monday, December 28, 2015, 01:11 (3257 days ago) @ Cody Miller
It was a joke. I understand people like different things, but it appears to be difficult to accept for some, searching for reasons to explain away my opinions.
I did watch the original version of SW again, and, as I maintained, I prefer the original Star Wars, however the final battle in my opinion is just better to watch in the new version.
Minus one billion
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Monday, December 28, 2015, 14:14 (3256 days ago) @ Funkmon
It was a joke. I understand people like different things, but it appears to be difficult to accept for some, searching for reasons to explain away my opinions.
I did watch the original version of SW again, and, as I maintained, I prefer the original Star Wars, however the final battle in my opinion is just better to watch in the new version.
For what it's worth, I don't think the special editions deserve all the hate they get either, for the most part.
I think some of the changes that were made are silly, and a step down from the originals (Han shooting first, the Han/Jabba scene in Episode 4, the musical number in Return of the Jedi, the beak added to the sarlaac pit), but there were a lot of genuine improvements too. I like a lot of the extra background detail that was added, as well as the general improvements to picture quality and color balance.
I do however think that the Special Editions are problematic across the board because most of the changes, good or bad, stick out like a sore thumb. I like the extra celebration shots added to the end of Return of the Jedi for the additional context they bring, but they don't look like anything else in the movie. Plus, because they are pure CGI, they've actually aged faster than any of the practical effects in the film. Every time I see a CG element or shot in the original trilogy films, it pulls me out of the movie because they just aren't added seamlessly.
Minus one billion
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Wednesday, December 30, 2015, 01:18 (3255 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
I do however think that the Special Editions are problematic across the board because most of the changes, good or bad, stick out like a sore thumb. I like the extra celebration shots added to the end of Return of the Jedi for the additional context they bring, but they don't look like anything else in the movie. Plus, because they are pure CGI, they've actually aged faster than any of the practical effects in the film. Every time I see a CG element or shot in the original trilogy films, it pulls me out of the movie because they just aren't added seamlessly.
One billion times this. As is obvious, few things get my blood boiling like what George Lucas did to the franchise beginning with the Special Editions.
It bothers me that no one can see the original trilogy except for crappy copies. (I haven't seen the Despecialized version of Star Wars, but it infuriates me that we have go to so much trouble to have that.)
I apologize to Funkmon for my rhetoric. I do maintain, however, that we have a much different frame of reference, and it's George Lucas's fault.
Yeah, but Disney = white slavers!
by Avateur , Wednesday, December 30, 2015, 22:44 (3254 days ago) @ Kermit
edited by Avateur, Wednesday, December 30, 2015, 23:24
Lucas himself said it:
How mad is Lucas right now? I mean sure, he sold it for $4 billion, but Disney will make all of that back and more on merchandise alone. And that's just this year, which is almost over. Also, why sell the kids then?
At the very least, I'm very happy that Lucas being gone means no more whacked out edited versions of previous movies (I HOPE). Granted, the initial special edition release (the re-release to theaters in the 90s) wasn't that bad (when compared to what's been done up to the Blu-Ray versions).
If Episode VIII doesn't show some actual vision or creativity going forward, that will suck. Disney didn't spend all of this money to give us a final trilogy. They may milk this franchise into oblivion for all we know. I seriously hope they're willing to absolutely take risks instead of churning out the same cut/paste movie year after year. Like how Disney mostly leaves Pixar alone, you know? Sure, we may get a Cars sequel every now and then, but we also get those huge risks that turn out unbelievably fantastic like Up or WALL-E. Star Wars has so much room for risks that lead to rewards, and I hope they have the vision to let it happen!
Minus one billion
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Monday, December 21, 2015, 03:34 (3263 days ago) @ Funkmon
I'll chalk this one up to the extreme prejudice and stubbornness of old age. If you had seen the movies with some objectivity (at about the same time, within a couple years of each other) I'm sure you'd have a different opinion.
You're probably right if I saw what you saw, but it would be an ignorant opinion, and notice the importance of that word, ignorant. We'll all ignorant until we're not, and it's a state that can be corrected, except in this case George Lucas has actively kept younger people ignorant and prevented them from judging the original films fairly.
Doesn't make sense or feel good, does it? It's fine to disagree, but to explain away my ideas as me just being ignorant because of youth is just you not wanting to give them a fair treatment.
It feels fine, because I don't think you understand where I'm coming from.
I explained I didn't know they were out of circulation because I have them on DVDs, and didn't go searching for them. They were just the DVDs I bought at the store. I understand not liking the new versions, but dismissing differing opinions is silly.
You miss my point. You don't have them on DVD. You've got a crappy version of them, and it makes a difference.
You characterize my viewing of the trilogy as not being objective. I don't know how you can be more objective than seeing them in their first week of release in the theater. That's how I saw all of them. I dedicated several summers of my life to practically memorizing every frame of them long before anyone could watch them in their living room. I knew every beat, every shot--I knew the characters like I knew my family, and I knew what made the films work. Not only that, but I read everything I could get my hands on that explicated Star Wars, from Joseph Campbell on down. When they first came out on VHS, I tried to watch them. I didn't enjoy it very much. They were greatly diminished on the small screen.
With age comes some privileges, and one of those is having experiences that can't be had later. An analogy: one of my all-time favorite live albums is Sam Cooke: Live at the Harlem Square Club, 1963. I love it, and if I could go back and see Cooke at that show, I would do it in a heartbeat. But let's say I knew a 70-year-old who had seen that show, but said, "Kerm, Sam was great, but if you could see one show, it should be Otis Redding at Leo's Casino in 1967." I'd have to defer to his experience.
You're welcome to your opinions, and I realize you enjoy being something of an iconoclast. You're looking at the originals through a lens darkly, I'm remembering them in their original, unmolested glory. Yes, it could be nostalgia, but you don't know that, and the real crime is there is no way for you to make a fair judgment
Minus one billion
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Monday, December 21, 2015, 17:46 (3263 days ago) @ Kermit
I'll chalk this one up to the extreme prejudice and stubbornness of old age. If you had seen the movies with some objectivity (at about the same time, within a couple years of each other) I'm sure you'd have a different opinion.
You're probably right if I saw what you saw, but it would be an ignorant opinion, and notice the importance of that word, ignorant. We'll all ignorant until we're not, and it's a state that can be corrected, except in this case George Lucas has actively kept younger people ignorant and prevented them from judging the original films fairly.
Doesn't make sense or feel good, does it? It's fine to disagree, but to explain away my ideas as me just being ignorant because of youth is just you not wanting to give them a fair treatment.
It feels fine, because I don't think you understand where I'm coming from.
I explained I didn't know they were out of circulation because I have them on DVDs, and didn't go searching for them. They were just the DVDs I bought at the store. I understand not liking the new versions, but dismissing differing opinions is silly.
You miss my point. You don't have them on DVD. You've got a crappy version of them, and it makes a difference.You characterize my viewing of the trilogy as not being objective. I don't know how you can be more objective than seeing them in their first week of release in the theater. That's how I saw all of them. I dedicated several summers of my life to practically memorizing every frame of them long before anyone could watch them in their living room. I knew every beat, every shot--I knew the characters like I knew my family, and I knew what made the films work. Not only that, but I read everything I could get my hands on that explicated Star Wars, from Joseph Campbell on down. When they first came out on VHS, I tried to watch them. I didn't enjoy it very much. They were greatly diminished on the small screen.
With age comes some privileges, and one of those is having experiences that can't be had later. An analogy: one of my all-time favorite live albums is Sam Cooke: Live at the Harlem Square Club, 1963. I love it, and if I could go back and see Cooke at that show, I would do it in a heartbeat. But let's say I knew a 70-year-old who had seen that show, but said, "Kerm, Sam was great, but if you could see one show, it should be Otis Redding at Leo's Casino in 1967." I'd have to defer to his experience.
You're welcome to your opinions, and I realize you enjoy being something of an iconoclast. You're looking at the originals through a lens darkly, I'm remembering them in their original, unmolested glory. Yes, it could be nostalgia, but you don't know that, and the real crime is there is no way for you to make a fair judgment
Funkmon, just to be clear, I thought I was ribbing you, and my heat is reserved for Lucas. Few things in pop culture make me angrier than how Lucas has mismanaged his legacy. I give you credit for preferring the original Star Wars--even without having seen it in theaters. He mucked that one up the worst.
Just finished watching Despec
by MrPadraig08 , Steel City, Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:21 (3266 days ago) @ Korny
There are only a few times where the special editions helped the movies out IMO:
-added some more speed to the New Hope dogfights (they stick out way more now than I remember)
-removed yub nub from the final scene in Jedi and added the current beautiful score that is played now
I had to look up the changes to empire, because I didn't notice their absence.
If the despecialized version does any one thing right, it's give you an unfettered appreciation for how great of a sequel Empire is. Jedi used to be top of my list, but after this recent reviewing, I think the nerd sages of old have convinced me.
Just finished watching Despec
by Korny , Dalton, Ga. US. Earth, Sol System, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 13:23 (3265 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
There are only a few times where the special editions helped the movies out IMO:
-added some more speed to the New Hope dogfights (they stick out way more now than I remember)
Yeah, the space battles are some of the few things that I enjoyed growing up, and the despecialized editions do suffer somewhat from prolonged cheap effects.
-removed yub nub from the final scene in Jedi and added the current beautiful score that is played now
Sammy enjoyed the original ending, I've yet to tell her about Hayden Christensen's cameo, though. Perhaps I never shall.
I had to look up the changes to empire, because I didn't notice their absence.
That one has the second least/least noticeable number of changes, and a number of them were actually left in the Despecialized edition, interestingly enough... Good film, but not as good as I had remembered...
If the despecialized version does any one thing right, it's give you an unfettered appreciation for how great of a sequel Empire is. Jedi used to be top of my list, but after this recent reviewing, I think the nerd sages of old have convinced me.
For me, it actually bumped up A New Hope above Empire in my enjoyment scale (with Return of the Jedi being just as bad and as dragged out as I remember). As influential as the arc, storytelling, and structure were, Empire is largely forgettable, because of how little actually happens. But the good scenes are good, and Sammy loved it.
Final takeaways:
Sammy loved C-3PO and R2 the most. It's funny to think that C-3PO was considered the Jar Jar of the time by some. He has a lot of charm in the first two films.
I've been spoiled by Tartakovsky and Blur's takes on lightsaber battles. The duels in the films are much slower and simple. One of the few things that Return of the Jedi did better than the other films, though. I loved Luke's Lightsaber battle with Vader at the end there. The prequels had terrible super-choreographed fights that tended to drag on lifelessly (and don't get me started on Revenge of the Sith's stupid half-hour battle).
Sammy's first comment when the credits rolled on RotJ: "All of the old people died!" *cries*
We're ready for The Force Awakens.
PS. Sammy was able to finally appreciate this:
That vid... Thank you. Thank you, Korny
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Saturday, December 19, 2015, 13:35 (3265 days ago) @ Korny
- No text -
Just finished watching Despec
by MrPadraig08 , Steel City, Monday, December 21, 2015, 13:23 (3263 days ago) @ Korny
-removed yub nub from the final scene in Jedi and added the current beautiful score that is played now
Sammy enjoyed the original ending, I've yet to tell her about Hayden Christensen's cameo, though. Perhaps I never shall.
The saddest part of adding a great finale score to that scene is, of course, they had to add extraneous bullshit. The galaxy celebrating doesn't make a whole lot of sense, and don't get me started on the inclusion of hayden. Speaking of, it's a little strange to have older Anakin there all cleaned up and not disfigured considering he didn't really exist in adulthood without the suit.
Final takeaways:
Sammy loved C-3PO and R2 the most. It's funny to think that C-3PO was considered the Jar Jar of the time by some. He has a lot of charm in the first two films.
That is funny, showed my sister the OT in this past viewing run, and C3PO irked her throughout. But, unlike jar jar, she was worried for him when he got blown to bits. He's annoying, but ultimately charming.
I've been spoiled by Tartakovsky and Blur's takes on lightsaber battles. The duels in the films are much slower and simple. One of the few things that Return of the Jedi did better than the other films, though. I loved Luke's Lightsaber battle with Vader at the end there. The prequels had terrible super-choreographed fights that tended to drag on lifelessly (and don't get me started on Revenge of the Sith's stupid half-hour battle).
Yea, I do love the OT duels, mainly for what's at stake in each. I imagine the choreography of the PT would have more value to it if anything at all was at stake. I appreciate it a lot more now when someone gets involved in a fight completely or somewhat untrained. Wildly swinging and shooting, not really knowing what they are doing. (i.e. heroes in TFA)
Sammy's first comment when the credits rolled on RotJ: "All of the old people died!" *cries*
They have a tendency to do that...
What'd you and Sammy think of TFA?
Just finished watching Despec
by Korny , Dalton, Ga. US. Earth, Sol System, Monday, December 21, 2015, 14:14 (3263 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
-removed yub nub from the final scene in Jedi and added the current beautiful score that is played now
Sammy enjoyed the original ending, I've yet to tell her about Hayden Christensen's cameo, though. Perhaps I never shall.
The saddest part of adding a great finale score to that scene is, of course, they had to add extraneous bullshit. The galaxy celebrating doesn't make a whole lot of sense, and don't get me started on the inclusion of hayden. Speaking of, it's a little strange to have older Anakin there all cleaned up and not disfigured considering he didn't really exist in adulthood without the suit.
I always took it as him being who he was on the inside at the end (a Jedi), rather than what he was externally (a... Sith?). Residual self-image?
:v
Made far more sense than becoming a teenage ghost...
Final takeaways:
Sammy loved C-3PO and R2 the most. It's funny to think that C-3PO was considered the Jar Jar of the time by some. He has a lot of charm in the first two films.
That is funny, showed my sister the OT in this past viewing run, and C3PO irked her throughout. But, unlike jar jar, she was worried for him when he got blown to bits. He's annoying, but ultimately charming.
Yeah, and exists for more than just comic relief. He was R2's counterpart and foil, in every sense.
I've been spoiled by Tartakovsky and Blur's takes on lightsaber battles. The duels in the films are much slower and simple. One of the few things that Return of the Jedi did better than the other films, though. I loved Luke's Lightsaber battle with Vader at the end there. The prequels had terrible super-choreographed fights that tended to drag on lifelessly (and don't get me started on Revenge of the Sith's stupid half-hour battle).
Yea, I do love the OT duels, mainly for what's at stake in each. I imagine the choreography of the PT would have more value to it if anything at all was at stake. I appreciate it a lot more now when someone gets involved in a fight completely or somewhat untrained. Wildly swinging and shooting, not really knowing what they are doing. (i.e. heroes in TFA)
Totally. The OT duels show those skilled in wielding a weapon that cuts and burns on contact, remaining mobile and evasive against an enemy that could kill them if they make a single mistake. As opposed to:
And part of why the final fight in RotJ is fantastic. Despite his training, Luke is coming from a place of anger, so he wails on Vader, wearing the old man down.
And that is paralleled in TFA, where Finn and Rey essentially wear down the wounded and otherwise frail Kylo. They have no training, just anger and reflexes.
I love that. I love when a fight has weight.
Sammy's first comment when the credits rolled on RotJ: "All of the old people died!" *cries*
They have a tendency to do that...
What'd you and Sammy think of TFA?
I posted below, and we got into it for a while afterwards about context, story beats, the nature of a planned trilogy, and other stuff, but my basic thoughts are in the post.
Actually, to bring it full circle beautifully...
by Korny , Dalton, Ga. US. Earth, Sol System, Monday, December 21, 2015, 15:56 (3263 days ago) @ Korny
I've been spoiled by Tartakovsky and Blur's takes on lightsaber battles. The duels in the films are much slower and simple. One of the few things that Return of the Jedi did better than the other films, though. I loved Luke's Lightsaber battle with Vader at the end there. The prequels had terrible super-choreographed fights that tended to drag on lifelessly (and don't get me started on Revenge of the Sith's stupid half-hour battle).
Yea, I do love the OT duels, mainly for what's at stake in each. I imagine the choreography of the PT would have more value to it if anything at all was at stake. I appreciate it a lot more now when someone gets involved in a fight completely or somewhat untrained. Wildly swinging and shooting, not really knowing what they are doing. (i.e. heroes in TFA)
Totally. The OT duels show those skilled in wielding a weapon that cuts and burns on contact, remaining mobile and evasive against an enemy that could kill them if they make a single mistake. As opposed to:
And part of why the final fight in RotJ is fantastic. Despite his training, Luke is coming from a place of anger, so he wails on Vader, wearing the old man down.
And that is paralleled in TFA, where Finn and Rey essentially wear down the wounded and otherwise frail Kylo. They have no training, just anger and reflexes.
I love that. I love when a fight has weight.
Something that I've always wanted to see (and that this film gave us a little bit of), was a real brawl. A real fight for survival, and one of the greatest cinematic examples is the film "The Raid: Redemption". The film has fantastic scenes where a variety of different fighting skills clash, resulting in chaotic fights that mix skill, the randomness of fights, and the clear struggle for survival that's often missing in movie fights. Check this not-too spoilery fight scene from the film. It's painful to watch, and all the better for it:
*minor spoils*
And the funny thing? Two of this film's stars are in The Force Awakens as the leaders of the second gang that Han owes money to...
Just finished watching Despec
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 16:11 (3262 days ago) @ Korny
I always took it as him being who he was on the inside at the end (a Jedi), rather than what he was externally (a... Sith?). Residual self-image?
Yes, exactly! Granted, there were lots of things Lucas re-did later that maybe didn't improve things or make sense, but I never thought that was one of them. I think it absolutely makes sense that Anakin's Force ghost, or whatever you want to call it, would reflect who he was back when he was still serving the light. And once we reached a point IRL where we had a visual representation of young Anakin, it made sense that that would be what he looks like.
Han shot first, though. Srsly.
Just finished watching Despec
by uberfoop , Seattle-ish, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 20:58 (3265 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
edited by uberfoop, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 21:35
-removed yub nub from the final scene in Jedi and added the current beautiful score that is played now
Yub Nub is kind of dodgy as a song in isolation, but IMO the scene content works better in context, and it has a vastly superior transition to credits. While it could probably be improved, I think the Yub Nub ending works significantly better overall than Victory Celebration.
...As far as bad song+scene redos go though, it's much less catastrophic than Lapti Nek -> Jedi Rocks.
Just finished watching Despec
by MrPadraig08 , Steel City, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 00:38 (3265 days ago) @ uberfoop
-removed yub nub from the final scene in Jedi and added the current beautiful score that is played now
Yub Nub is kind of dodgy as a song in isolation, but IMO the scene content works better in context, and it has a vastly superior transition to credits. While it could probably be improved, I think the Yub Nub ending works significantly better overall than Victory Celebration....As far as bad song+scene redos go though, it's much less catastrophic than Lapti Nek -> Jedi Rocks.
I agree the Victory Celebration scene is unneeded, but the score feels a bit more worthy of a trilogy ending than yub nub
N00b Question...
by breitzen , Kansas, Saturday, December 26, 2015, 20:39 (3258 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
Where can one get their hands on the Despecialized Edition?
Asking for a friend of a friend...
OK, I'm asking for myself.
Curmudgeon's opinion, where I rank all 7 movies. No spoilers
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:21 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
edited by Funkmon, Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:00
For me, I don't think this movie will stand the test of time. It is a movie for this exact moment in time, a time after a decade without Star Wars, and thirty years without the classic films. I would gladly see it again, but I wouldn't pay.
The biggest problem with the prequels was no Han Solo type character. That is, nobody going through and cracking jokes the whole time. The movies took themselves too seriously, and the ostensibly funny characters fell flat. There are a few characters like Han in the new movie, and the movie itself is funny, like the first three.
However, there are always things Star Wars does that you only see in Star Wars. The space combat in the first one, the Hoth fight and the cloud city in the second, the forest chase and bomb ass lightsaber shit in the third one. The next one had podracing and double lightsabers, the one after had totally cool bounty hunters, an arena, and a bunch of Jedi. The sixth film had, in my opinion, the best lightsaber battles yet. In my opinion, the new Star Wars had no standout sequences where I thought "that was really cool," which, to me, are one of the hallmarks of Star Wars. There is literally nothing in that movie where I thought "I have got to see that again!"
The plot, in my opinion, is like a fan fiction. The stuff within is like fan fiction, as well.
When watching the Star Wars movies, in every one, there is something new and creative. In this one, there is nothing new and creative. You can tell the creative mind was making the first six, and the new one is completely derivative.
That isn't to say it's not good. It's very good. It's technically better than the other movies...but it is just a fan doing a tribute in my opinion. I saw nothing new and creative in this film.
I was worried it would be too good and it wouldn't seem like Star Wars going in. I was wrong to worry about that. It definitely felt like Star Wars. When I saw the opening crawl, it put a massive smile on my face. The letters shook. It looked like JJ Abrams filmed it exactly like George Lucas did the first one. The smile never left my face.
Every time there was a homage, or something Star Warsy happened, I smiled wider. I spent the whole movie worrying that it might end soon. It was a great movie, with few things I didn't like.
But, again, it was derivative. I understand why it was. It has to sell old fans on the premise that Star Wars can be good again, and it also needs to win new fans. What better way than releasing a greatest hits album for a movie? I think this is a great idea for this movie, and expect the next movie to return to being more creative. If not, I'll be disappointed.
As such, I'm updating my constantly changing Star Wars movie ranking to include this one. I expect as more films release, this one will fall below Revenge and Empire. At this time, though, it's very good.
Best
1. Star Wars
2. The Force Awakens
3. Revenge Of The Sith
4. Empire Strikes Back
5. The Phantom Menace
6. Return Of The Jedi
7. Attack of the Clones
Worst
Your ranking is wrong. ;-P :-)
by dogcow , Hiding from Bob, in the vent core., Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:32 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
Best
1. Star Wars
2. The Force Awakens
3. Revenge Of The Sith
4. Empire Strikes Back
5. The Phantom Menace
6. Return Of The Jedi
7. Attack of the Clones
Worst
Seriously, Return of the Jedi below the Phantom Menace? No. Just... No.
1- Empire Strikes Back
2- A New Hope
3- Return of the Jedi (but dang, this was so good, Jabba's Palace, saving Han, the Throne Room, speeders in the forest, the sarlac pit... so much awesome in this one, the Ewoks were its downfall)
4- Revenge of the Sith
5- Attack of the Clones
6- The Phantom Menace
I haven't seen The Force Awakens so I can't rank it, but my suspicion is that it'll be a contender for the top 3 spots. As it currently is, the top 3 are VERY close, almost as close as this.
Edit: Apparently typing is difficult and error prone.
No way!
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:41 (3266 days ago) @ dogcow
During a Star Wars trivia event, my trivia team was aghast at my ranking.
When I was a kid, I liked Empire and Return more than Star Wars. Now, I don't. Not sure what changed.
I think Star Wars is a perfect film. I don't think a single thing could be added to make it better. I also think Raiders of the Lost Ark is a perfect movie, while we're on Lucasfilm perfect movies.
I watched Empire again this year and it's exactly what I remember from last time I watched it, last year, for the trivia event. Boring. It's a great movie, but it's boring. Return of the Jedi, in my opinion, is only a good movie. The Ewoks are dumb and half the movie is just the last half of Star Wars intercut with cool lightsabers. Again, good, but not great.
The Phantom Menace is also a good movie, and if I see it on TV, you bet your ass I'm watching the podracing and the Darth Maul fight, which is, in my opinion, one of the best fights I've ever seen. I really liked Phantom Menace. It also had dumb stuff in it which brings it down, but the highs really outweigh the lows to me in that movie.
No way!
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:52 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
During a Star Wars trivia event, my trivia team was aghast at my ranking.
When I was a kid, I liked Empire and Return more than Star Wars. Now, I don't. Not sure what changed.
I think Star Wars is a perfect film. I don't think a single thing could be added to make it better. I also think Raiders of the Lost Ark is a perfect movie, while we're on Lucasfilm perfect movies.
I watched Empire again this year and it's exactly what I remember from last time I watched it, last year, for the trivia event. Boring. It's a great movie, but it's boring. Return of the Jedi, in my opinion, is only a good movie. The Ewoks are dumb and half the movie is just the last half of Star Wars intercut with cool lightsabers. Again, good, but not great.
The Phantom Menace is also a good movie, and if I see it on TV, you bet your ass I'm watching the podracing and the Darth Maul fight, which is, in my opinion, one of the best fights I've ever seen. I really liked Phantom Menace. It also had dumb stuff in it which brings it down, but the highs really outweigh the lows to me in that movie.
I think the only thing I agree with you on is Attack of the Clones is the worst of the prequels.
My ranking:
1. Return of the Jedi (I'm a sucker for good space battles)
2. Empire Strikes Back
3. A New Hope
4. The Force Awakens
5. A Phantom Menace
6. Revenge of the Sith
7. Attack of the Clones
No way!
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:02 (3266 days ago) @ Xenos
1. Return of the Jedi (I'm a sucker for good space battles)
I ordered in what I felt were best to worst in my post, but I'd like to use your post to point out that my personal favorite is Jedi even if I can recongize that it's not as great as IV and V. I can't put it ahead of that perfect script in Episode IV or that movie-making gold in Empire, but I sure do love me some Jedi primarily due to the space battles (and it's really fun watching little Ewoks beat up on Stormtroopers regardless of how ridiculous it is).
Super excited Rogue One
by Blackt1g3r , Login is from an untrusted domain in MN, Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:06 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
Jedi is probably my favorite for the space battles as well (though I also love lightsaber duels). I can't wait for the Rogue One movie, the Rogue Squadron books were some of my favorite books in the EU. A good mix of special operations, space battles, and humor would make for a great TV show spinoff as well. It'd be like Battlestar Galactica but better because it wouldn't have all the weird stuff.
Same!
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:10 (3266 days ago) @ Blackt1g3r
I'm not sure what to think since it's basically a prequel to Episode IV but a sequel to III in an anthology-type fashion, but I am totally on board. Also, did you ever play the Rogue Squadron games for N64 and Game Cube? Freaking fantastic. The stories in those games and the missions really help to have me excited for this movie (even though the EU is dead and gone now lol).
Same!
by Blackt1g3r , Login is from an untrusted domain in MN, Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:15 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
I'm not sure what to think since it's basically a prequel to Episode IV but a sequel to III in an anthology-type fashion, but I am totally on board. Also, did you ever play the Rogue Squadron games for N64 and Game Cube? Freaking fantastic. The stories in those games and the missions really help to have me excited for this movie (even though the EU is dead and gone now lol).
I played them briefly but I didn't have either system. Though I played a ton of X-Wing back in the day on my computer. They so need to bring a game like that back. :)
No way!
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 17:47 (3262 days ago) @ Avateur
1. Return of the Jedi (I'm a sucker for good space battles)
I ordered in what I felt were best to worst in my post, but I'd like to use your post to point out that my personal favorite is Jedi even if I can recongize that it's not as great as IV and V. I can't put it ahead of that perfect script in Episode IV or that movie-making gold in Empire, but I sure do love me some Jedi primarily due to the space battles (and it's really fun watching little Ewoks beat up on Stormtroopers regardless of how ridiculous it is).
About those space battles, Return of the Jedi was when I started wanting them to dial it back. Less is more. I could no longer follow what was happening.
For years my order was Empire, SW, Jedi, but now SW has regained the prime spot. As Funkmon said, it's perfect.
No way!
by Avateur , Wednesday, December 23, 2015, 01:14 (3262 days ago) @ Kermit
About those space battles, Return of the Jedi was when I started wanting them to dial it back. Less is more. I could no longer follow what was happening.
In Jedi's defense, the entire thing was so chaotic and needed to be. All out war in space, basically the final move of both parties at this point. I'm usually a strong proponent of less being more, but not when it comes to Jedi's action scenes. The prequels, though, were in dire, dire need of less.
For years my order was Empire, SW, Jedi, but now SW has regained the prime spot. As Funkmon said, it's perfect.
I think the worst part about all of this, though it's not necessarily a bad thing while being the worst part, is that VIII and IX and whatever else won't end up living up to IV and V most likely. I'll be shocked if they somehow surpass those originals.
No way!
by dogcow , Hiding from Bob, in the vent core., Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:06 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
I think Star Wars is a perfect film. I don't think a single thing could be added to make it better. I also think Raiders of the Lost Ark is a perfect movie, while we're on Lucasfilm perfect movies.
You should see the shirt I'm wearing... here's a link: http://shirt.woot.com/offers/starcheology-strikes-back
No way!
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:08 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
During a Star Wars trivia event, my trivia team was aghast at my ranking.
When I was a kid, I liked Empire and Return more than Star Wars. Now, I don't. Not sure what changed.
I think Star Wars is a perfect film. I don't think a single thing could be added to make it better. I also think Raiders of the Lost Ark is a perfect movie, while we're on Lucasfilm perfect movies.
I disagree on perfect film for IV, but I do call it a perfect script. I do totally agreed on Raiders (and I love Raiders to death), but my favorite is Last Crusade.
I watched Empire again this year and it's exactly what I remember from last time I watched it, last year, for the trivia event. Boring. It's a great movie, but it's boring. Return of the Jedi, in my opinion, is only a good movie. The Ewoks are dumb and half the movie is just the last half of Star Wars intercut with cool lightsabers. Again, good, but not great.
The boring argument for V is valid, but that also adds to why the movie is so great. It doesn't have to rely on explosions and flashing lights and endless action to attempt to maintain the audience's attention. Its writing, story, characterization, editing, and cinematography is just brilliant as a whole. Does that unfortunately lead to boring parts? Yes. But the movie as a whole is much greater for the parts where it slows down, in my opinion.
As for the Jedi argument, can't argue with that! But it sure is fun, right? It could have been soulless and trite. I'm so glad it's not. Sometimes good is just fine.
The Phantom Menace is also a good movie, and if I see it on TV, you bet your ass I'm watching the podracing and the Darth Maul fight, which is, in my opinion, one of the best fights I've ever seen. I really liked Phantom Menace. It also had dumb stuff in it which brings it down, but the highs really outweigh the lows to me in that movie.
I can't disagree with you enough on this one, but I will agree with you when it comes to the Darth Maul fight. Podracing went on for too long. You know that thing about Empire being boring? The podracing parts of Phantom Menace are too boring for me. Just way too much of the movie spent on it.
lol
by cheapLEY , Friday, December 18, 2015, 23:02 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
Star Wars fans are seriously all over the place.
I love the podracing scene (easily my favorite part of Episode I), but I think the Darth Maul fight is awful. I don't know what it is, but I just don't think it's very well choreographed or something. They way they swing their lightsabers around just looks silly for me (somehow even more silly than all the jumping and flipping that happens in all the big fights later in the prequels).
I'm not a huge fan of the prequels in general, but I do think Revenge of the Sith holds its own as a pretty good movie. I think they screwed up the pacing and Anakin's path to becoming Vader was much too accelerated. In one scene he's doing the right thing and telling the Jedi Council what he's learned, in the next he all but murders Windu with pretty much no build up. I hate to be that guy, but I read the novelization of Revenge of the Sith, and I think it really handled that transition very well. Other than that failing, though, I think RotS is pretty good.
Saber fights in Phantom Menace
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 02:27 (3264 days ago) @ cheapLEY
They look silly because they were blatantly avoiding each other.
Revenge of Sith look great despite the acrobatics because they had Hayden and Ewan extensively train in actual sparring. They accidentally hit each other way too often in rehearsals.
If you take Darth Maul's fight, however, you can easily see they're either aiming too high or too low every single time.
Still, back then, when I all I had to go for was the original trilogy's saber fights, Darth Maul looked like a beast in saber-ing fools.
Saber fights in Phantom Menace
by cheapLEY , Monday, December 21, 2015, 03:30 (3263 days ago) @ ZackDark
I just watched Revenge of the Sith earlier tonight. And you're right, the saber battles in it are good, even with the acrobatics. The beginning of the Obi-Wan and Vader fight is ridiculous (in a good way). It's so fast but precise. It's a convincing fight between two incredibly powerful Jedi at the height of their skills.
No way!
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Wednesday, December 23, 2015, 19:40 (3261 days ago) @ Funkmon
but the highs really outweigh the lows to me in that movie.
This, right here, is why RotJ is my favorite Star Wars movie. I would never say "it is the best", because I think Empire is by far the strongest in the series in terms of being a well told story with fantastic pacing, great drama, and even a decent script. Basically, you don't need to be into Star Wars at all to appreciate it as a good film. For all the love that A New Hope gets (rightfully so), I think it is also a silly movie with plenty of dumb dialog and clumsy filming. Even at the age of 5, I thought the Obi-Wan/Vader fight looked ridiculous. But Empire holds up in almost every way.
That being said...
RotJ nails the heart and soul of Star Wars for me. I'd go as far as to say the final 30 minutes IS Star Wars, as far as I'm concerned. From Luke and Leia's conversation outside the Ewok hut right through to the end of the movie; everything I love about Star Wars can be found right there in those 30~ minutes. It is also some of the best fantasy/action movie making I've ever seen in terms of the pacing and timing, shifting focus between the 3 simultaneous scenes taking place, all with their own ebbs and flows. Awesome stuff.
That's where A New Hope falls flat for me. It is great, but there isn't a single moment in that movie that I really feel. Empire is better for me, but it still doesn't connect with me on as much of an emotional level as RotJ. In some ways, I think the Prequels did a better job of hitting some of the emotional high points than episode 4 or 5 did (although they are clearly inferior movies in almost every way). For all the problems with Episode 1, that fight with Darth Maul was edge-of-my-seat thrilling. AotC is my least favorite in the franchise specifically because it features so many significant scenes that get completely bumbled; Anakin and Padme falling in love, the reveal of Darth Tyranus, the murder of almost 200 Jedi in the arena, Yoda fighting... all of these moments should have been extremely powerful, but just fell flat. The only real redeeming moment for me in AotC is the death of Anakin's mother and the immediate aftermath. When he breaks down in front of Padme and admits what he just did, that was the only point in the movie where I really felt for him.
RotS is a mixed bag for me.I think a lot of the individual scenes ended up being somewhat disappointing, but they still managed to convey the general weight of what was going on effectively. There was a real sense of things spiraling out of control over the first half of the movie. You could really feel the approaching disaster, and how helpless the Jedi must have felt about it. Anakin and Padme's scenes together feature some of the worst dialog I've ever seen in a movie, but I still felt the weight of their desperation and how scared they both were. And Ewan McGregor single-handedly saves the end of the movie. The words he and Anakin had to say to each other were horribly written, but damn did he make me feel them :)
Nice thoughts. Here's some of mine
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 18:56 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
I'm going to do my damnedest to avoid spoilers by keeping mostly in tune with how you went about describing things. I'll avoid plot details as a whole.
To start, the script was weak. The plot was thin. Luckily, the writing for the characters and the pace of the film help to make up for these flaws. It's also unfortunate that some characters get completely shelved or underdeveloped for half (or more) of the movie. They missed some good opportunities.
I'm not going to sit here and try to tell anyone that this movie was better than IV or V, or even better than Mad Max: Fury Road. It wasn't. I know you brought up fanfiction, but I'm not feeling it on this one. I couldn't shake the feeling of fanfiction while watching the Hobbit trilogy that didn't need to be a trilogy. I'm not feeling it with Episode VII. That could drastically change depending on how they handle VIII.
In a way, it can be viewed as disappointing that Episode VII relied so heavily on setting a foundation for the future instead of taking any true real risks (like you pointed out). At the same time, I'm completely fine with it because the goal of this movie was to show that Star Wars could be great again (to the old fans) as well as new and exciting to new fans. It didn't take itself too seriously, and it managed to establish some really great new characters that we'll be going along with into the future.
As part of the whole "we saw this before in IV" mentality, one reason I feel like this works is because of how it was handled. We're thirty years after Jedi. Thirty years ago, what was the real world like? The more things change, the more they stay the same, right? War, peace, and revolution continue on, and this remains true in a galaxy far, far away.
There are definitely a lot of unanswered questions, some of which were hinted at via Force-vision, and are clearly being held off for future movies.
Granted, the movie was "safe" in the sense that it didn't want to implode on itself right out of the gates. The movie was actually fun and enjoyable, it had intensity, emotion, nostalgia, and really excelled with the new characters and the ideal promises of what's to come. Where this movie fails, as you pointed out, is in how safe it tried to be. There was nothing spectacularly new like in the previous six movies. Even though the prequels failed, they did attempt to do their own thing in a lot of ways. The true test is going to be reinventing the greatness in what lies ahead as opposed to continuing to repeat. The lack of Abrams at director should help with this. There's new life in the franchise, so now hopefully VIII can go do its own thing.
I don't want to see a repeat of V or VI. It's time for an original plot and story now that VII accomplished its mission. It threw back enough to IV to make this movie work and ground the universe yet again. It was fun, exciting, and the movie was actually great. I'm willing to put it up there with Jedi. Since you provided your own order, I'll give you mine as far as what I feel are the best movies to the worst.
1. Empire
2. A New Hope
3. Jedi
4 (or tied at or close to 3? I'll give it a few viewings). Force Awakens
5. Revenge of the Sith
6. Attack of the Clones
7. Phantom Menace
I'm going to reply with spoilers. This will spoil the plot.
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:20 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
To start, the script was weak. The plot was thin. Luckily, the writing for the characters and the pace of the film help to make up for these flaws. It's also unfortunate that some characters get completely shelved or underdeveloped for half (or more) of the movie. They missed some good opportunities.
This was part of what made it feel like Star Wars to me. All 6 of the films had dumb scripts and dumb plots. They all had undeveloped characters. Biggs, for example.
I'm not going to sit here and try to tell anyone that this movie was better than IV or V, or even better than Mad Max: Fury Road. It wasn't. I know you brought up fanfiction, but I'm not feeling it on this one. I couldn't shake the feeling of fanfiction while watching the Hobbit trilogy that didn't need to be a trilogy. I'm not feeling it with Episode VII. That could drastically change depending on how they handle VIII.
I didn't get a fan fiction vibe with The Hobbit. Here's why I did for this one. Imagine you're a 16 year old kid writing a fan fiction for Star Wars.
You like Tatooine or whatever. Okay, set your story on a planet basically the same. You liked Luke's reluctance to go with Obi-Wan until fate forces his hand. All right, your character will do that too. You liked putting the fate of the rebels into the hands of a droid. Go for it. You liked Han Solo, but thought Luke was a drag. Good, Luke disappeared, and your story miraculously has Han show up with his ship. Darth Vader was totally cool, but he's dead, so you come up with a new guy in a mask. Part of the cool thing about Vader was that he was family of Luke. Shit, make the new guy Luke's nephew. The sacrifice of Obi-Wan was awesome, too. Let's kill Han for our sacrifice at the end. You loved the trench in Star Wars. Might as well put another one in this movie for no reason whatsoever. Okay, so we need another death star...but that's lame. This is a SUPER DEATH STAR. And the lightsaber the bad guy has is a SUPER LIGHTSABER. And at the end, unmasking Darth Vader was awesome, so you have the bad guy unmasked! Twice! The climactic battle in Empire where Luke and Vader never finished was totally sick. Then how he left, searching for a teacher to make him a real Jedi? Man. Amazing. Let's have new main character do literally the exact same thing.
On the other hand, The Hobbit movies were just expanding on the book. They were like The Flood for Halo. There wasn't a lot of detail in the books, so PJ had to come up with stuff to fill three movies, and he created a lot of neat shit.
This movie seems more like, "I want to spend more time with the characters but have zero new ideas," which is much more like fan fiction to me than "I would love to show what happened during the book with more detail than the book gives," though I suppose both can create that feeling.
Otherwise, I think we agree on the film.
Same *SP*
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:40 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
Otherwise, I think we agree on the film.
Totally. I think that's another reason why this film was so good and enjoyable. People can recognize its flaws, even from completely different directions, and yet still recognize that it was a pretty awesome movie.
This was part of what made it feel like Star Wars to me. All 6 of the films had dumb scripts and dumb plots. They all had undeveloped characters. Biggs, for example.
Agreed. This is why I could forgive them dropping one character in particular. Boba Fett hardly got any screen time, but everyone loves him. I assume it'll go the same with Phasma. As for Poe, they actually established his character really well. I'm sad he wasn't in the movie more!
You like Tatooine or whatever. Okay, set your story on a planet basically the same. You liked Luke's reluctance to go with Obi-Wan until fate forces his hand. All right, your character will do that too. You liked putting the fate of the rebels into the hands of a droid. Go for it. You liked Han Solo, but thought Luke was a drag. Good, Luke disappeared, and your story miraculously has Han show up with his ship. Darth Vader was totally cool, but he's dead, so you come up with a new guy in a mask. Part of the cool thing about Vader was that he was family of Luke. Shit, make the new guy Luke's nephew. The sacrifice of Obi-Wan was awesome, too. Let's kill Han for our sacrifice at the end. You loved the trench in Star Wars. Might as well put another one in this movie for no reason whatsoever. Okay, so we need another death star...but that's lame. This is a SUPER DEATH STAR. And the lightsaber the bad guy has is a SUPER LIGHTSABER. And at the end, unmasking Darth Vader was awesome, so you have the bad guy unmasked! Twice! The climactic battle in Empire where Luke and Vader never finished was totally sick. Then how he left, searching for a teacher to make him a real Jedi? Man. Amazing. Let's have new main character do literally the exact same thing.
Haha, okay, I see where you're coming from. I didn't get that vibe because I feel like the writers didn't set out with that thought in mind. I think a lot of it was expressly trying to pay homage to the past and to nostalgia while being able to set a foundation for what's to come. There is a valid argument to be made that they should have just started with whatever new things were going to potentially be in VIII, but I get why they did what they did.
It was a great film that was planned out to merge the old characters and situations with the new characters and situations so that they can go and tell a new story in the future (I so truly hope). They relied too heavily on what came before, though still nowhere near close to what Abrams did with Star Trek Into Darkness.
I also liked how Abrams basically poked fun at the fact that a lot of this was familiar through Han's dialogue. Yeah yeah, a bigger Death Star. Oooo. We've destroyed them before. They always have some thing to fly into to blow up. We got this. Big deal.
It was pretty self-aware to the point that the end of the movie hardly focused on it. It was all about what was going on with the characters inside/on the base as opposed to the ship battle up above. That big emphasis on the new characters and their story gives me a lot of hope for VIII. I hope they're brave enough to go somewhere different.
Oh, and the Lightsaber isn't a super lightsaber. It's archaic and almost appears unstable (hence the vent ports on the sides). I'm pretty sure that Kylo has a very strong grasp when it comes to raw exploitation of his powers (mindreading, stopping a freaking laser fired at him from behind, freezing people in their tracks), but mediocre training as a whole. His temper tantrums and inability to actually focus that rage makes it seem like he just uses anger and pain to use his powers. He's not Vader, Maul, Dooku, or Palpatine, that's for sure.
As for why Rey is so powerful, I'm wondering if she was trained when she was too young to really remember a lot of it, and then dropped off on Jakku by Luke after the Kylo situation went down. I can forgive her being an ace pilot with no real training based on prior precedent of Anakin being able to fly the Naboo fighter without any real training as well as Luke's being strong with the Force (Vader's words) during the trench run. Unanswered questions for the future that I'm really looking forward to seeing answered. Oh, and she's probably Luke's kid. :P
Same *SP*
by Funkmon , Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:51 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
I'm wondering if she was trained when she was too young to really remember a lot of it, and then dropped off on Jakku by Luke after the Kylo situation went down.
Holy shit.
I thought it was a super lightsaber because it was more powerful and had to have vents and look ragged and stuff.
Same * SW 7 SP*
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 19:21 (3265 days ago) @ Avateur
You like Tatooine or whatever. Okay, set your story on a planet basically the same. You liked Luke's reluctance to go with Obi-Wan until fate forces his hand. All right, your character will do that too. You liked putting the fate of the rebels into the hands of a droid. Go for it. You liked Han Solo, but thought Luke was a drag. Good, Luke disappeared, and your story miraculously has Han show up with his ship. Darth Vader was totally cool, but he's dead, so you come up with a new guy in a mask. Part of the cool thing about Vader was that he was family of Luke. Shit, make the new guy Luke's nephew. The sacrifice of Obi-Wan was awesome, too. Let's kill Han for our sacrifice at the end. You loved the trench in Star Wars. Might as well put another one in this movie for no reason whatsoever. Okay, so we need another death star...but that's lame. This is a SUPER DEATH STAR. And the lightsaber the bad guy has is a SUPER LIGHTSABER. And at the end, unmasking Darth Vader was awesome, so you have the bad guy unmasked! Twice! The climactic battle in Empire where Luke and Vader never finished was totally sick. Then how he left, searching for a teacher to make him a real Jedi? Man. Amazing. Let's have new main character do literally the exact same thing.
I think this is one of those areas where it will be impossible to please everyone.
The cyclical nature of life is very much one of the core themes that Star Wars has always explored. Even within the original trilogy, we are made to see parallels between Vader and Luke... parallels which would then be expanded upon in the prequels (to varying degrees of success). So I get that The Force Awakens would revisit similar themes and situations. It is very much part of the core of Star Wars.
The tricky part is how far to take the similarities. Clearly, there are A LOT of super intense Star Wars fans. Fans who watch the movies on a fairly regular basis, read the books, play the games, etc. These fans know every scene, every plot point with intimate detail.
But then there is also the wider audience. Many people who consider themselves "fans" who might have only seen each movie once or twice, maybe even missed one or two of them completely. People who only have a vague memory of the exact plot, which events took place in which movie, etc. It's still important for these viewers to pick up on the theme of "life repeating" that is so important within Star Wars. And the similarities need to be somewhat bold or obvious in order for those viewers to notice them.
I'm going to reply with spoilers. This will spoil the plot.
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 02:33 (3264 days ago) @ Funkmon
I completely agree with the "fanfic repetition" view. I still loved every single bit of the movie, though. I don't know, but I think that's quite an accomplishment.
Curmudgeon's opinion, where I rank all 7 movies. No spoilers
by Cody Miller , Music of the Spheres - Never Forgot, Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:46 (3266 days ago) @ Funkmon
Best
1. Star Wars
2. The Force Awakens
3. Revenge Of The Sith
4. Empire Strikes Back
5. The Phantom Menace
6. Return Of The Jedi
7. Attack of the Clones
Worst
In what world is Revenge of the Sith even close to the original trilogy? Get out of here man! I can understand putting A New Hope above Empire, but this shit's bananas yo.
I have never encountered opinions like those...
by Monochron, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 20:07 (3265 days ago) @ Funkmon
Thanks for broadening my horizons!
Welcome to Funkmon's world
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 18:02 (3262 days ago) @ Monochron
- No text -
Just saw Star Wars *NO SP*
by MrPadraig08 , Steel City, Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:08 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
Edit: Btw, there's nothing after the credits (to save you all some time if you don't want to wait).
and miss out on free credits soundtrack?
Just saw Star Wars *NO SP*
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:16 (3266 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
You saw the movie, right?! Thoughts?
No spoil thoughts
by MrPadraig08 , Steel City, Friday, December 18, 2015, 19:59 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
You saw the movie, right?! Thoughts?
We live in a time and age where a star wars movie, currently, is good and there is hope the series will continue to be good and worth watching and loving. That hasn't really happened since I've been alive. So that gets me really, really jazzed.
follow up post will be spoils.
No spoil thoughts
by Avateur , Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:13 (3266 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
Awesome. Btw, a bunch of us got Battlefront on Xbox. Just thought I'd let you know. :D
Prep my shuttle
by MrPadraig08 , Steel City, Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:31 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
- No text -
Spoil thoughts
by MrPadraig08 , Steel City, Friday, December 18, 2015, 20:31 (3266 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
only sticking points I had were:
-Republic is destroyed so quickly we can't even get to know how much of a loss that is, and by extension, we get no idea of how big or important the First Order is. Have they just been sitting by bored when the republic went down so easily. But this can all be expanded upon further later.
-Finn is a little too spastic for my initial impression, but I am growing to like his personality more. at times he is just eating the scenery, but that could definitely be due to his sheltered upbringing.
-There were almost too many comedic beats, at some point you begin to question whether the stormtroopers or phasma are even a real threat. This does lead into development of one character...
Now more general thoughts:
-Han ;_;7
-The fact that kylo is a mad little bitch makes sense and is the predecessor to his future in the series. Now that he has committed the cardinal sin, he only wants more of the dark. I expect him to be pretty scary in the next movie. maybe even in a comedic set up, where he demasks and his face is all kinds of fucked up.
-the dogfights were excellent and continue to highlight the series as the best action to watch
-The red herring of finn being the jedi upstart in the trailers was brilliant
-I want a poster of Rei sitting outside the ATAT with a rebel helmet on
-I was afraid at the end that I was going to have Skywalker blue balls. But boy oh boy doesn't he look marvelous.
That's all I got for now
Spoil thoughts
by Cody Miller , Music of the Spheres - Never Forgot, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 16:34 (3265 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
edited by Cody Miller, Saturday, December 19, 2015, 17:25
Only three gripes:
Another bigger Death Star was kind of lame.
The supreme leader being CGI was really dumb! Totally stuck out, and took me out the moment he showed up. Just put a guy in makeup. Nothing about his appearance could not have been done with makeup and prosthetics.
I heard portions were shot in IMAX, so I saw it in a real IMAX theatre. Turns out it is just ONE action scene. It is not to the level of Dark Knight Rises in terms of amount shot in IMAX.
Other than that… LOVED IT.
Spoil thoughts
by MrPadraig08 , Steel City, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 00:40 (3265 days ago) @ Cody Miller
Only three gripes:
Another bigger Death Star was kind of lame.
The supreme leader being CGI was really dumb! Totally stuck out, and took me out the moment he showed up. Just put a guy in makeup. Nothing about his appearance could not have been done with makeup and prosthetics.
I heard portions were shot in IMAX, so I saw it in a real IMAX theatre. Turns out it is just ONE action scene. It is not to the level of Dark Knight Rises in terms of amount shot in IMAX.
Other than that… LOVED IT.
I agree with these.
I did appreciate the Starkiller being pulled out of the old EU, but it's really a bit cliche at this point.
and Snoke looked almost Lord of the Rings Cave Troll to me. He was pretty out of place.
Spoil thoughts
by JDQuackers , McMurray, PA, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 01:38 (3265 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
and Snoke looked almost Lord of the Rings Cave Troll to me. He was pretty out of place.
On some level I want to believe that was intentional. I feel like the holographic projection that Snoke displays is a complete illusion--and not just like making a tiny little guy bigger, but as if he's making up an entirely different appearance that would seem "scary" to people.
Spoil thoughts
by cheapLEY , Sunday, December 20, 2015, 02:24 (3265 days ago) @ JDQuackers
and Snoke looked almost Lord of the Rings Cave Troll to me. He was pretty out of place.
On some level I want to believe that was intentional. I feel like the holographic projection that Snoke displays is a complete illusion--and not just like making a tiny little guy bigger, but as if he's making up an entirely different appearance that would seem "scary" to people.
I could buy that.
I personally saw Gollum mixed with Grendel from that CGI Beowulf movie.
Spoil thoughts
by Cody Miller , Music of the Spheres - Never Forgot, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 06:22 (3264 days ago) @ JDQuackers
and Snoke looked almost Lord of the Rings Cave Troll to me. He was pretty out of place.
On some level I want to believe that was intentional. I feel like the holographic projection that Snoke displays is a complete illusion--and not just like making a tiny little guy bigger, but as if he's making up an entirely different appearance that would seem "scary" to people.
But it looked stupid.
Another question (SPOILERS)
by cheapLEY , Saturday, December 19, 2015, 02:52 (3266 days ago) @ Avateur
My biggest question: will this be a story of redemption like the OT? Or will they keep the old EU story of Han and Leia's son being killed (with Rey as a stand in for Jaina)?
I really like that they killed the old EU material as canon. They're not locked into it, but they can still pull from it whenever they want even if the details aren't exact. Here's for hoping Snoke is a stand in for Thrawn.
Another question (SPOILERS)
by Funkmon , Saturday, December 19, 2015, 05:37 (3265 days ago) @ cheapLEY
I also like that they killed the EU, but for personal, extremely selfish, reasons. It was getting unwieldy with its different tiers. I bought the Thrawn books in like 2006 but never got around to reading them. Now that they killed it, I have a great starting point of last fall to stars reading the books. Unfortunately, they shit out about one a month plus random short stories in the $10 an issue magazine so I'm completely behind.
I think you're right about pulling from the extended universe but not the details, too. They can find what worked with the fans, then take those elements and turn them into something they think they can film. I am looking forward to seeing more and how it compares to the Thrawn books, the plot of which I know. I might get around to reading them sometime.
Another question (SPOILERS)
by Avateur , Sunday, December 20, 2015, 01:51 (3265 days ago) @ cheapLEY
My biggest question: will this be a story of redemption like the OT? Or will they keep the old EU story of Han and Leia's son being killed (with Rey as a stand in for Jaina)?
I hope not. Let's see what they can do with something a bit more unique.
Just saw Star Wars *NO SP*
by SonofMacPhisto , Saturday, December 19, 2015, 22:52 (3265 days ago) @ Avateur
Flawless. Perfection. 10/10
Also, John Williams IS the Force I'm pretty sure.
Just saw Star Wars *NO SP*
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Monday, December 21, 2015, 02:10 (3264 days ago) @ SonofMacPhisto
Flawless. Perfection. 10/10
Also, John Williams IS the Force I'm pretty sure.
Means a lot, reading this. Less than 24 hours now...
Some Thoughts *SPOILERS*
by cheapLEY , Sunday, December 20, 2015, 02:21 (3265 days ago) @ Avateur
edited by cheapLEY, Sunday, December 20, 2015, 02:57
I've had a bit to let it sink in.
I think it's great. Is it as good as the originals? I don't think so, but I don't think anything ever will be. There's too much baggage and nostalgia to live up to there.
I think it's close, though. It may not be a perfect film, but I think it's exactly what Star Wars needed to be at this exact moment.
The emotional beats all paid of for me. I didn't personally really like the way Han died. I mean, I get that he was trying to save his son, and that worked, but the details and the way it played out just felt a bit awkward for some reason.
I actually really liked Kylo Ren as a petulant brat. Not sure why, I just think it worked. It's better than having a Vader clone.
I'm a little disappointed at the lack of Luke. I get it, but it was disappointing. On the other hand, he looks great as an old Jedi Master.
Rey was really the highlight for me; a cool new hero to root for. I think Finn is great too, although it took a bit for me to really come to like him.
Star Killer base is a bit disappointing too, just because it's another giant super weapon that blows up planets. Are we going to see a bigger, half complete Star Killer base in Episode IX? Also, for whatever reason, it's not anywhere near as scary or imposing as the Death Star was. Maybe because we've seen it before, but I'm not sure. Seeing it blow up a few random planets didn't work as effectively as seeing the Death Star destroy Alderaan.
But overall, I think it's a terrific Star Wars movie. It had a great sense of adventure, a great sense of humor, good action, and at least a decent plot. It obviously leaned pretty heavily on the original trilogy, but I think it worked and set up a cool new story in the Star Wars universe. I'm excited to find out who Rey is.
And as one final note, the introduction of the Millennium Falcon is just an amazing scene. Watching it scrape the dirt making the corner before it flew into the Star Destroyer was just such a cool shot, and the entire sequence is fantastic.
EDIT: Forgot to say: I do have to wonder what people who haven't seen the original Star Wars think of it. It's hard for me to imagine what that'd be like, but I don't think it's a necessity for enjoying The Force Awakens. As much as I've heard some complain about the reliance on throwbacks, they all absolutely worked for me, and had me grinning like an idiot throughout basically the entire movie, and they did contribute a great deal to my personal enjoyment of the film. I just wonder how not recognizing or caring about those throwbacks might affect someone's opinion.
Some Thoughts *SPOILERS*
by Beorn , <End of Failed Timeline>, Monday, December 21, 2015, 01:28 (3264 days ago) @ cheapLEY
EDIT: Forgot to say: I do have to wonder what people who haven't seen the original Star Wars think of it. It's hard for me to imagine what that'd be like, but I don't think it's a necessity for enjoying The Force Awakens.
So I’ve been wondering the same thing. My wife hasn’t seen the original trilogy but she’s shown some interest in the new film. I think the biggest problem would be grasping the whole family tree. I don’t know if I should just explain the basics for her and have her see just the new film (which I think she’ll enjoy), or suggest that she watch IV, V, and VI first (which might be a bit of a slog just to see the new one).
Some Thoughts *SPOILERS*
by cheapLEY , Monday, December 21, 2015, 03:38 (3263 days ago) @ Beorn
Like I said, it's too hard to imagine not having seen the other Star Wars films for me to truly comprehend what it'd be like. I think The Force Awakens would be an enjoyable film for a newcomer, but it definitely wouldn't be the same film without getting all the nods to the originals. However, even with the required knowledge, those nods would still probably be a miss unless the viewer really loved the OT. Otherwise they're still just nods to something the viewer isn't invested in. I really feel like this is first and foremost a film for Star Wars fans, while making a film for new fans was a secondary consideration.
But again, without being in that position, it's hard to tell.
"Grinning like an idiot" is the perfect phrase for this film
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 02:38 (3264 days ago) @ cheapLEY
- No text -
Just saw it myself. One word: Yes.
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 02:38 (3264 days ago) @ Avateur
- No text -
*MASSIVE SPOILERS LIE HERE*
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 02:45 (3264 days ago) @ ZackDark
- The Falcon reveal ("That's just a piece of junk" *boom* beat *pans to Falcon* *grin like an idiot*)
- The Falcon escape (close scraping with ALL THE THINGS *grin like an idiot*)
- C-3PO reveal (*grin like an idiot*)
- Florest-planet (?) dogfighting and Poe kicking ass (weaving back and forth, exploding ALL THE TIES *snipes Stormtroopers manhandling Han* *grin like an idiot*)
- Rey finds Luke on the island in the giant ocean she uses as mental image to calm herself (*grin like an idiot*)
*MASSIVE SPOILERS LIE HERE*
by cheapLEY , Monday, December 21, 2015, 03:47 (3263 days ago) @ ZackDark
The Falcon escape (close scraping with ALL THE THINGS *grin like an idiot*)
Seriously my favorite sequence. It was such a cool shot, and such a great introduction for the Falcon.
Rey finds Luke on the island in the giant ocean she uses as mental image to calm herself (*grin like an idiot*)
Damn, I didn't even think of that angle. That was a great moment, and the only think that made Luke's absence from the film acceptable.
My only issue right now is: the Jedi seem like little babies. It just hit me tonight after I watched Revenge of the Sith.
Yoda, after failing to defeat Palpatine, immediately declares he must go into exile. Then in the OT when we first see him, he's hanging out, doing nothing, and even initially doesn't want to train Luke.
Now we have Luke doing the same thing after failing with Ben Solo.
Why are the Jedi so quick to give up and go into exile after making mistakes?
They've got 99 problems but a Sith ain't one
by Avateur , Monday, December 21, 2015, 04:02 (3263 days ago) @ cheapLEY
- No text -
*MASSIVE SPOILERS LIE HERE*
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 13:38 (3263 days ago) @ cheapLEY
My only issue right now is: the Jedi seem like little babies. It just hit me tonight after I watched Revenge of the Sith.
Yoda, after failing to defeat Palpatine, immediately declares he must go into exile. Then in the OT when we first see him, he's hanging out, doing nothing, and even initially doesn't want to train Luke.
Now we have Luke doing the same thing after failing with Ben Solo.
Why are the Jedi so quick to give up and go into exile after making mistakes?
It seems meditation before action is a big thing for them. Leads right to silly stuff like these...
*MASSIVE SPOILERS LIE HERE*
by cheapLEY , Monday, December 21, 2015, 13:56 (3263 days ago) @ ZackDark
My only issue right now is: the Jedi seem like little babies. It just hit me tonight after I watched Revenge of the Sith.
Yoda, after failing to defeat Palpatine, immediately declares he must go into exile. Then in the OT when we first see him, he's hanging out, doing nothing, and even initially doesn't want to train Luke.
Now we have Luke doing the same thing after failing with Ben Solo.
Why are the Jedi so quick to give up and go into exile after making mistakes?
It seems meditation before action is a big thing for them. Leads right to silly stuff like these...
I mean, I get that, but it seems like Yoda was pretty content to just hang out in a swamp until he died. Doesn't seem like he really had any plans to train Luke, until Luke came to him.
Of course, he spent that time training with Qui-Gon, so it's not like he wasn't doing anything. But they just don't seem to be about making sure things get done.
And people complain about MY procrastination...
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 14:45 (3263 days ago) @ cheapLEY
- No text -
RotS Novel is a MUST READ - *MASSIVE SPOILERS LIE HERE*
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Monday, December 21, 2015, 15:29 (3263 days ago) @ cheapLEY
My only issue right now is: the Jedi seem like little babies. It just hit me tonight after I watched Revenge of the Sith.
Yoda, after failing to defeat Palpatine, immediately declares he must go into exile. Then in the OT when we first see him, he's hanging out, doing nothing, and even initially doesn't want to train Luke.
Now we have Luke doing the same thing after failing with Ben Solo.
Why are the Jedi so quick to give up and go into exile after making mistakes?
It seems meditation before action is a big thing for them. Leads right to silly stuff like these...
I mean, I get that, but it seems like Yoda was pretty content to just hang out in a swamp until he died. Doesn't seem like he really had any plans to train Luke, until Luke came to him.Of course, he spent that time training with Qui-Gon, so it's not like he wasn't doing anything. But they just don't seem to be about making sure things get done.
The Revenge of the Sith novel by Mathew Stover is everything that the movie should have been. Stover manages to take everything from the movie and make it make sense, including Yoda's decision making towards the end.
In the novel, while Yoda is battling the Emperor, he comes to the realization that despite all his skills and power, his hundreds of years of study and practice, he just doesn't have what it takes to defeat Palpatine. He realizes these new Sith have spent decades (or far longer if you include their entire lineage) preparing to destroy the Jedi. Meanwhile, having thought the Sith were no more, the Jedi were completely unprepared to deal with such a foe. Yoda realizes that if he lets Palpatine escape, the consequences for the entire galaxy would be disastrous. But he also knows that if he dies at Palpatine's hand, there will be nobody to pass these insights along... nobody to prepare a new kind of Jedi who would ultimately have a chance against the new Sith. "A problem this is" he thinks to himself.
So when Yoda gets blasted down to the bottom of the Senate chamber, he seizes and opportunity to escape. When he says "Failed, I have..." he is not speaking specifically about his battle with Palpatine. He is saying he has failed as the leader of the Jedi. Keep in mind, he has just witnessed, and felt, the death of thousands of Jedi, all of whom he trained from childhood. To come face to face with the man responsible for the destruction of the Jedi and realize he was right under Yoda's nose the entire time, and Yoda was unable to stop him in any way... it really is a low point for the poor little guy.
So Yoda goes into hiding. He and Obi-wan, 2 of the greatest Jedi to ever live, come to understand that there is a purity to the Sith's passion that drives them to be stronger than any Jedi could hope to be. The Jedi order has spent centuries training the Jedi to be dispassionate, thoughtful, ruled by logic and not emotion. But since the Force is ultimately something that is felt, the Jedi were shooting themselves in the foot. To defeat the Sith, they would need a Jedi who was as driven by love as the Sith are by hate (ironically, Anakin very much could have been such a Jedi). That's why Obi-Wan didn't keep Luke and train him from birth. Yet, despite their awareness of their own flaws, Yoda and Obi still had difficulty breaking free from their own dogmatic molds. They lied and manipulated Luke more often than they were honest to him. So did the Emperor. When it comes to understanding his past and his power, the only person who was truly honest and open with Luke was Vader. Vader actually did as much to propel Luke as Yoda or Obi-wan did, by encouraging him to use his feelings, to trust them.
It all has the ring of fan-retconing to a certain degree, but the idea is that Yoda and Obi-wan understood that there were certain lessons Luke needed to learn from Anakin, either directly or at least by confronting him. "You must confront Vader... only then, a Jedi will you be". This wasn't about Luke beating Vader in a fight. If the test was to beat the bad guy in a saber duel, he would have told Luke to face the Emperor. No, Yoda's final task to Luke was to have him stand face to face with his father, with no more secrets or lies between them. Luke's love and compassion for his father and sister were so strong, so uncompromising, even the Emperor took notice. More importantly, so did Vader. He looked at his son and saw strength and power born out of love, not hate. That is why Vader, already wounded, was able to pick up the Emperor and carry him across the room while being blasted by Force lightning (an attack that leveled everyone from Yoda to Mace to Luke and even Anakin himself when he was younger). So in the end, Yoda was right both philosophically and in a very literal way. It was love that allowed Luke to face the Sith and remain true to himself, and it was Vader's love for his son that gave him the strength to carry the Emperor even while his own body was being obliterated.
Woah, I blacked out there for a minute. Hey... who did all this typing?!
Seriously thought, go read the Revenge of the Sith novel ;P
This. Just... This.
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 15:38 (3263 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
- No text -
RotS Novel is a MUST READ - *MASSIVE SPOILERS LIE HERE*
by cheapLEY , Monday, December 21, 2015, 16:50 (3263 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
Seriously thought, go read the Revenge of the Sith novel ;P
I actually have. :) I read it before I saw the movie, and it's part of the reason I like the movie. I could apply the insights from the novel to film and make it work; I filled in the bus-sized gaps the movie left with stuff I knew from the novel.
I agree that it's excellent, and I understand everything you said.
But my point is, even with all that, they weren't actively doing anything. If it wasn't for R2-D2 running into Luke, it seems like they would have been content to just sit around waiting. And not only that, Yoda flat out refuses to train Luke until Obi-Wan convinces him. What does he think is going to happen if he turned Luke away without training him? It seems like he'd basically just given up.
We don't know what Luke has been doing (other than searching for the first Jedi Temple), but it seems like he's been content to just let Kylo Ren run wild while he's in exile. That's not exactly dealing with your mistakes.
RotS Novel is a MUST READ - *MASSIVE SPOILERS LIE HERE*
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Monday, December 21, 2015, 22:21 (3263 days ago) @ cheapLEY
Seriously thought, go read the Revenge of the Sith novel ;P
I actually have. :) I read it before I saw the movie, and it's part of the reason I like the movie. I could apply the insights from the novel to film and make it work; I filled in the bus-sized gaps the movie left with stuff I knew from the novel.I agree that it's excellent, and I understand everything you said.
But my point is, even with all that, they weren't actively doing anything. If it wasn't for R2-D2 running into Luke, it seems like they would have been content to just sit around waiting. And not only that, Yoda flat out refuses to train Luke until Obi-Wan convinces him. What does he think is going to happen if he turned Luke away without training him? It seems like he'd basically just given up.
We don't know what Luke has been doing (other than searching for the first Jedi Temple), but it seems like he's been content to just let Kylo Ren run wild while he's in exile. That's not exactly dealing with your mistakes.
I totally get what you're saying. I guess I'd always rationalized it by telling myself Obi Wan and Yoda were specifically hiding. They couldn't really do anything without risking detection by Vader or Palpatine. I think the book even mentions Yoda's choice of Degobah was due to the abundance of diverse life forms, which would help mask his own force presence.
As far as Luke goes, who knows. Could boil down to trauma and guilt as much as anything else.
RotS Novel is a MUST READ - *MASSIVE SPOILERS LIE HERE*
by cheapLEY , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 01:59 (3263 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
Yeah I do recall something like that as well.
I get that they're in hiding. Hell, it doesn't really bother me that much. It just seems like they could be doing something. The main thing is Yoda's refusal to train Luke. I thought that was the plan? If he was too old, why did they wait so long?
Something else that hit me after watching RotS: How dumb is it to "hide" Leia with the Organas? A family highly involved with the Senate. Seems like there would have been a good chance that Bail might interact with Palpatine and he would be able to sense something was up. Obviously we know that didn't happen, just seems like a risky thing to do.
RotS Novel is a MUST READ - *MASSIVE SPOILERS LIE HERE*
by Avateur , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 02:34 (3263 days ago) @ cheapLEY
Hide her in plain sight because no one would expect it. Reverse situation of the Yoda issue. Palpatine was right there in Yoda's face for how long? How many of those Clone Troopers were around Yoda without Yoda having any sense or feel of their hidden purpose? Even if Palpatine had run into Leia, he may have never expected or noticed a thing. Even Vader didn't realize or notice anything in Episode IV with all of his time around her. Not even a subtle feel for the Force within.
The real question: would you gladly pay to see it again? ;)
by Avateur , Monday, December 21, 2015, 03:00 (3264 days ago) @ ZackDark
- No text -
Yes.
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 13:38 (3263 days ago) @ Avateur
Yes.
Yes.
Sammy and I saw it last night *no spoilz*
by Korny , Dalton, Ga. US. Earth, Sol System, Monday, December 21, 2015, 11:34 (3263 days ago) @ Avateur
edited by Korny, Monday, December 21, 2015, 11:59
She didn't love it as much as she did the original Trilogy, but she liked it. She didn't have to watch the prequels, which would probably have made her more forgiving towards this one.
I thought it was pretty good. After watching it, I got to thinking about the EU, and the thing that sticks out to me is how well something like Republic Commando fits into this new Universe. It's a less-polished lived-in universe, and I want to see more of it.
I wish it had been longer. The pacing felt just right in some sections, but very rushed in others. I think another half hour would have done wonders for the movie.
My best-worst list of things Star Wars:
Republic Commando
Blur's Star Wars shorts
A New Hope (Despecialized)
The Force Awakens
Clone Wars (Tartakovsky)
Empire Strikes Back
Parts of Attack of the Clones (Jango Fett and the latter half)
Return of the Jedi
The Phantom Menace
Holiday Special
Attack of the Clones
Revenge of the Sith
Sammy and I saw it last night *no spoilz*
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 13:40 (3263 days ago) @ Korny
I wish it had been longer. The pacing felt just right in some sections, but very rushed in others. I think another half hour would have done wonders for the movie.
Yeah. Can't wait for an Extended/Director's Cut. I mean, we will get one of those, aren't we?
Sammy and I saw it last night *no spoilz*
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Monday, December 21, 2015, 16:30 (3263 days ago) @ ZackDark
I wish it had been longer. The pacing felt just right in some sections, but very rushed in others. I think another half hour would have done wonders for the movie.
Yeah. Can't wait for an Extended/Director's Cut. I mean, we will get one of those, aren't we?
No, we're going to get a special edition version made by George Lucas.
YOU SHUT YOUR PIE-HOLE RIGHT NOW
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 17:38 (3263 days ago) @ Xenos
:p
DON'T GIVE THEM IDEAS!
by LostSpartan, Monday, December 21, 2015, 22:39 (3263 days ago) @ Xenos
You bad, bad person!
DON'T GIVE THEM IDEAS!
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 14:49 (3262 days ago) @ LostSpartan
You bad, bad person!
Literally Hitler.
Sammy and I saw it last night *no spoilz*
by MrPadraig08 , Steel City, Monday, December 21, 2015, 14:52 (3263 days ago) @ Korny
My best-worst list of things Star Wars:
Republic Commando
Blur's Star Wars shorts
A New Hope (Despecialized)
The Force Awakens
Clone Wars (Tartakovsky)
Empire Strikes Back
Parts of Attack of the Clones (Jango Fett and the latter half)
Return of the Jedi
The Phantom Menace
Holiday Special
Attack of the Clones
Revenge of the Sith
You actually bring up an interesting point here. As much as the EU was more or less unofficial, thinking back, so much of it colors my impression of this franchise. Which is kinda funny, considering it's all been stricken from the record, it's hard for me to conceptualize what is and isn't canon anymore. There's a lot of gray areas now. Some franchises could benefit from some unknown or unexplored corridors...
Sammy and I saw it last night *no spoilz*
by bluerunner , Music City, Monday, December 21, 2015, 22:05 (3263 days ago) @ MrPadraig08
Some franchises could benefit from some unknown or unexplored corridors...
cough*Halo*cough*forerunners*cough
Also
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, December 21, 2015, 14:56 (3263 days ago) @ Korny
Holiday Special
Attack of the Clones
Revenge of the Sith
Ouch.
No KotOR?
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 05:01 (3262 days ago) @ Korny
Perhaps I can no longer feel joy.
by Bones , The Last City, Earth, Sol System, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 01:34 (3263 days ago) @ Avateur
I found 'The Force Awakens' to be, at best, an incoherent mess populated by one-dimensional caricatures, nonsensical plot developments, terrible dialogue, and a schizophrenic tone, and ultimately the perfect example of style over substance.
But what do I know? I'm a cranky old man who doesn't understand this generation.
Perhaps I can no longer feel joy.
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 02:41 (3263 days ago) @ Bones
I found 'The Force Awakens' to be, at best, an incoherent mess populated by one-dimensional caricatures, nonsensical plot developments, terrible dialogue, and a schizophrenic tone, and ultimately the perfect example of style over substance.
But what do I know? I'm a cranky old man who doesn't understand this generation.
It helps to remember that most people believe that the previous three movies had characters with no dimensions, no plot worth speaking of, dialogue that was the worst in movie history, a tone that was about as lively as a dead frog, and a high effects budget that was mainly spent having world class actors give some of the worst takes of their careers because the only thing they had to act against was a green screen. It was, in most people's opinions, a far and away better movie than that.
Now, was The Force Awakens a perfect movie? A textbook great movie? A movie with ironclad plot or super complex characters? No. But neither was Star Wars, or The Empire Strikes Back, or Return of the Jedi.
What The Force Awakens was... was fun. It had awesome dogfights between space fighters. It had laser swords. It had planet killing weapons of doom. And it had enough talent and polish emotion and budget to hold together at least a fair bit more than the minimum of all of those.
I get not liking the type of movies the Star Wars movies are. Personally I enjoyed the fun but am pretty turned off by the terrible explanation of the state of the galaxy, or the way faster than light travel seems to take absolutely zero time to skip across the galaxy in time to send a fighter squadron to stop a doomsday weapon that will fire in a few minutes or any number of things. Star Wars movies always have a whole lot of things wrong with them.
But a generational thing isn't one of them... I don't think.
Perhaps I can no longer feel joy.
by Avateur , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 03:01 (3263 days ago) @ Bones
I found 'The Force Awakens' to be, at best, an incoherent mess populated by one-dimensional caricatures, nonsensical plot developments, terrible dialogue, and a schizophrenic tone, and ultimately the perfect example of style over substance.
I disagree with you on some points, but you're definitely not wrong on others. This is a pretty fun gathering of details, and most of them are pretty spot on. Oh, and spoilers if you click this link:
40 Unforgivable Plot Holes in Star Wars The Force Awakens
But what do I know? I'm a cranky old man who doesn't understand this generation.
I don't think this generation has anything to do with it. It was a pretty purposeful choice by Abrams, who has a really bad habit of doing things like this when playing with other franchises (not to mention what he did with Lost and then left the clean up to other people). He revitalized the franchise, is gone from Episode VIII and IX as director, and now maybe this can open up the future for something fairly original (as far as Star Wars plot goes) with a much better emphasis on writing and story.
Perhaps I can no longer feel joy.
by cheapLEY , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 12:03 (3262 days ago) @ Avateur
I disagree with you on some points, but you're definitely not wrong on others. This is a pretty fun gathering of details, and most of them are pretty spot on. Oh, and spoilers if you click this link:
That article is garbage. Most of those points are very nitpicky (and only a few are actual plotholes), and some of them are answered in the movie. It's like the author went in trying to find things that were "wrong" rather than paying attention to what was going on.
I saw it on reddit last night and was going to reply to some of them point by point, but was too lazy.
Actually: *SPOILERS*
by cheapLEY , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 12:37 (3262 days ago) @ cheapLEY
So, not a refutation of every point, just most of them.
3. Kylo Ren, a powerful Force-user, fights a light saber duel with an ex-janitor who has never held a light saber and yet (a) never uses the Force on his opponent, though doing so would have ended the duel immediately, and (b) barely wins the fight, suggesting that he is simultaneously one of the least strategic wielders of the Force the Dark Side has ever seen and, despite his training, absolutely terrible with a light saber. None of this stops Kylo Ren from designing and building his own, completely impractical cross-barred lightsaber.
I see this complaint all the time, and it's stupid. He handily wins the fight against Finn; it's not even close. Keep in mind that he's wounded. But how do we know what Finn's training is? Finn fights another Stormtrooper with that electrified club thing; maybe Finn has trained with that thing? He handled himself alright in that fight, so it's a possibility.
Also, Kylo Ren is powerful. He doesn't need to use the Force to dispatch a Stormtrooper. We also don't know how much training he's actually had with a lightsaber. He's not anywhere close to as proficient as Vader was, but everyone seems to think he's already this super bad ass villian when the movie pretty clearly shows us he's not.
4. Rey becomes nearly as effective a Force-user in a few hours as Luke Skywalker did in a few years.
I think that's intentional, and it's supposed to show us both that Rey is very powerful with the Force and that Kylo Ren isn't as well-trained and badass as he thinks he is.
6. The reason Ren was slowly bleeding to death -- instead of being dead by Rey's hand -- is that a massive a chasm had just miraculously opened up in the several feet between the two of them. Such bad timing for Rey! (Damn you, deus-ex-geology!)
Well there was a massive earthquake happening from the explosion and destabilization. Sure, lucky that it separated them. Not worth being upset about.
7. Rey, who has never left her home planet since she was a child, can speak Wookie. Nobody can speak Wookie -- it's a running joke in the Star Wars universe. But Rey being able to speak Wookie surprises neither her, Han Solo, nor Chewbacca himself.
Can she? I honestly don't remember her answering Chewie, but I've only seen it once so I might have just missed it.
8. It's okay that Poe survived a Tie Fighter crash; after all, so did Finn. But has any film ever cared less about (a) giving the false impression a character has died, and then (b) having that character show up later with no one being surprised by it? Even Finn doesn't seem to care very much what the explanation is.
Did anyone actually believe Poe was dead? I would call that person naive.
11. Kylo Ren is the head of the Knights of Ren, but there are no other Knights of Ren in the movie.
Plot hole doesn't mean what he thinks it means, I don't think. Just because they're not in the movie doesn't mean they don't exist. Also he's wrong, as they're in Rey's vision.
12. Captain Phasma is supposed to be a big-deal character in The Force Awakens, if the merchandising and casting are any indication, and yet (a) how bad of a commanding officer do you have to be, how thoroughly inept in military tactics and strategy, to command the worst-trained fighting force in the Galaxy (the Stormtroopers hit even less with their blasters in The Force Awakens than in any preceding Star Wars film); (b) she's only in three scenes, in one of which she relays an order from Kylo Ren to initiate a massacre of innocents (hardcore!) and in another of which she immediately surrenders to Han, Rey, and Finn as soon as they encounter her and then does exactly everything they ask of her (pathetic!), making her character incomprehensible; and (c) in her third scene she effectively reveals that Finn's character is incomprehensible, as she notes that he has in fact been trained since birth to obey all orders, and has never in his life disobeyed even a single order until the day he decides to act like he's never been trained, indoctrinated, or dehumanized at all.
Okay, agreed, Phasma was underused and kindof stupid.
13. Really? Was there no previous order Finn had ever refused to execute? Was the slaughter on Jakku actually the first naughty thing the First Order had ever required of him?
Well, he's a space garbage man, so maybe?
14. Finn is an ex-janitor who goes AWOL from a Stormtrooper force numbering in the tens of thousands. Yet he is absolutely convinced, despite being someone of no importance whatsoever to the First Order, that he will be chased across the galaxy for having defected. Apparently, there's a premium on janitors in this quadrant of the Galaxy. Sure, Finn killed some people during his escape, but doesn't the First Order emphasize with every tactical decision it makes that it considers its soldiers thoroughly expendable, and don't they quite obviously have much bigger fish to fry during the events of The Force Awakens than to worry about Finn? Why wouldn't this be obvious to him?
Okay, he's a janitor. I don't think he's privy to all the First Order's grand plans. He's probably been indoctrinated to think that abandoning the First Order will lead to a manhunt and is the worst thing he could ever do. That's how ruling by fear works.
16. By the end of the movie, the impression is left that every single First Order soldier is dead besides Supreme Leader Snoke, General Hux, and Kylo Ren.
Are we given that impression? Was every single Imperial soldier killed aboard the first Death Star? I certainly wasn't given that impression.
17. Why does General Hux need to gather all of his troops just to tell them he's about to press a button and destroy the entire Republic? Can't he do that without a cattle-call of his entire army? Because it really ends badly for him, putting his entire army on the very planet he's about to make Resistance Target #1. No chance anybody saw that coming?
It's a dramatic show of force and probably some sort of morale booster for his troops. It's what they've been working for. Making a sort of ceremony around it isn't that peculiar.
19. Why wasn't the Resistance able to access R2D2's data archives at any point over the course of the many years Luke was gone? Why did they, instead, simply prop him up in a corner, when they had to know that he knew Luke's whereabouts -- as he always has in the past?
It seemed pretty clear to me that Luke did something to him to make it impossible to retrieve that information until the time was right.
21. Kylo Ren has such a Force-enabled sense of where his father is in the Galaxy that when his father lands on Starkiller Base, Ren immediately exclaims to himself, "Solo!" Yet a few minutes later, when Ren is just twenty feet from Solo, he can't detect him -- and actually starts searching for him in the wrong direction.
The exact same thing happens in A New Hope. Vader senses Obi-Wan's presence, but doesn't know exactly where he is.
24. Rey says that the Millennium Falcon is "garbage" and hasn't been flown in many, many years. Indeed, it's such junk, in her view, that she won't even board it when she's about to be ripped to pieces by twenty Tie Fighters. Then she gets on board and it basically flies perfectly. So much so that it's not at all clear why no one has been flying it, let alone why its owner (Unkar Plutt) hasn't tried to sell it at any point over the past dozen years -- despite the fact that Plutt appears to live in a hovel.
It's the Millennium Falcon, that's sort of the running joke. Yeah, everyone thinks it's garbage, but it's not, and it's basically indestructible and just keeps on running. Also, maybe he hasn't sold it because to him it's like that rusted out, beat up '67 Mustang that he'll fix up "someday".
25. Why does Plutt offer Rey 250 times her usual pay for BB-8 and then, when she says "no," simply tell some of his heavies to just steal it? If Plutt is enough of a baddie to order it stolen at all, why not just steal it from the outset instead of first offering some random urchin the biggest financial windfall she's ever seen?
Because it's often much, much easier to buy something than it is to take it by force. And more importantly, because that moment informs us on Rey's character more than her simply fighting a few dudes to protect him would.
26. Maz Kanata is a friend to the Resistance. So why is she hiding Luke's light saber from them? Wouldn't she give them anything she could to help them find Luke, and doesn't it in fact turn out (as anyone could have supposed) that Luke's light saber is indeed helpful in tracking the last Jedi down?
Where was is said Maz Kanata is a friend to the Resistance? She's a friend of Han Solo, the smuggler, who doesn't have anything to do with the Resistance.
29. Who trained Rey to fight with a staff as effectively as she does, given that (a) she is an orphan with no friends or family, and (b) she has never been in a battle, but is, rather, merely a scrap-metal scavenger?
That's an awful lot of assumption about someone we've know for all of five minutes of her 20-something year life. How do we know she's never been in a battle? In fact, I'd bet you're wrong and that she's had to fight plenty to survive on Jakku.
30. If Finn is such a good guy that he would try to save Rey the moment he saw she was in distress, doesn't it further call into question just how in the world the order to kill civilians on Jakku was the first time he'd ever had qualms about doing something the First Order had asked him to do?
Again, he was a garbage-man. It seemed pretty clear that was the first time he'd seen combat.
31. Given that all Poe knows about Finn is that he's a First Order defector, why does he seem happy to see Finn just seconds after (and perhaps as) BB-8 tells him Finn is alive? There's no real reason for Poe to trust Finn -- or care about his well-being -- at all. Rather, he would assume, as anyone would, that whatever Finn did or did not do on Jakku, he surely had committed other atrocities for the First Order (and killed many a Resistance fighter) before then.
You wouldn't be happy to see the person that saved your life?
33. Why does Kylo Ren assign just a single Stormtrooper to guard Rey, the most valuable prisoner in the history of the First Order?
Why wouldn't he? She's locked up pretty securely.
34. How do the Rathtars on Han's freighter get loose? If he's just keeping them loose in the hanger, why don't they kill him when he's walking through the freighter toward the Millennium Falcon, or at any other time? And if he's got them chained up, how do they escape?
That's literally explained in the movie. Pay attention instead of trying to find things to point out on the internet.
36. Why are all Stormtroopers human (or humanoid)? If by the time of the First Order any clones being raised to be Stormtroopers are no longer clones of Jango Fett, why aren't there now Stormtroopers of every species as well as every (human) race? Why aren't there flying Stormtroopers from the same species as, say, Watto (from The Phantom Menace)?
I guess maybe it's not canon anymore, but the Empire used to be basically a bunch of racists and didn't want anything to do with anyone that wasn't human.
37. If basically everyone in the Galaxy knows the Force is not a myth -- for instance, every single Stormtrooper in the First Order, who has seen Kylo Ren use it or heard tell of him using it; every single person in the Resistance, who knows the Resistance is looking for Luke Skywalker; every single person in the Republic, which was first established in part by the heroism of the Jedis -- how is the existence of the Force a total shock to Rey? Jakku is sheltered, but as we know from the film (cf. Lor San Tekka) there are many people on Jakku who either have seen the Force first-hand or heard first-hand accounts of it from visitors to the planet.
I've seen this point a lot, too. What it boils down to, I think, is that not many knew about the Force to begin with, and the Empire spent the better part of 40 years erasing the Jedi and the Force from history books everywhere. In A New Hope, people that worked directly with Vader didn't believe in the Force.
I also get the impression that not many people know the full legacy of Luke Skywalker. The only one that knows what happened in the second Death Star is Luke anyone that Luke happened to tell, which probably only amounts to Leia and Han.
TL:DR; the author of this piece is bad and he should feel bad (and pay more attention the movies he's trying to bash online).
Actually: *SPOILERS*
by stabbim , Des Moines, IA, USA, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 14:48 (3262 days ago) @ cheapLEY
Allow me to pile on...
3. Kylo Ren, a powerful Force-user, fights a light saber duel with an ex-janitor who has never held a light saber and yet (a) never uses the Force on his opponent, though doing so would have ended the duel immediately, and (b) barely wins the fight, suggesting that he is simultaneously one of the least strategic wielders of the Force the Dark Side has ever seen and, despite his training, absolutely terrible with a light saber. None of this stops Kylo Ren from designing and building his own, completely impractical cross-barred lightsaber.
I see this complaint all the time, and it's stupid. He handily wins the fight against Finn; it's not even close. Keep in mind that he's wounded. But how do we know what Finn's training is? Finn fights another Stormtrooper with that electrified club thing; maybe Finn has trained with that thing? He handled himself alright in that fight, so it's a possibility.
People also forget that The Force is not just some resource that obeys commands. It controls the user as much as the user controls it, maybe even more. Those who wield it are sometimes just instruments, used to whatever end The Force is working toward. Being a Force sensitive person doesn't necessarily mean you win everything. It does mean that you sometimes progress toward your destiny in unusual ways, but that destiny still might be your own doom.
Basically, this person needs to play KotOR II. Kreia droppin' some knowledge on fools.
4. Rey becomes nearly as effective a Force-user in a few hours as Luke Skywalker did in a few years.
I think that's intentional, and it's supposed to show us both that Rey is very powerful with the Force and that Kylo Ren isn't as well-trained and badass as he thinks he is.
Yep. There's plenty of precedent in the Star Wars universe for exceptional force-users who gain ability faster than normal, or with not much training. Darth Bane developed pre-cognition abilities years before he even knew The Force existed. Also, see above about the nature of The Force. If it needs Rey to win the mental battle against Kylo in the chair, then she will.
Also, I think it's pretty clear that aside from lacking proper training, Kylo is unfocused and may not even be a "true" follower of the dark side. He mostly just seems to be lost and trying to emulate Vader. He surely must have some innate ability given his lineage, but he's not necessarily reaching that potential in his current role. My guess is he'll end up having a Vader-like change of heart further down the road. Which makes me wonder who his dark adversary will be at that point.
6. The reason Ren was slowly bleeding to death -- instead of being dead by Rey's hand -- is that a massive a chasm had just miraculously opened up in the several feet between the two of them. Such bad timing for Rey! (Damn you, deus-ex-geology!)
Well there was a massive earthquake happening from the explosion and destabilization. Sure, lucky that it separated them. Not worth being upset about.
Yeah, that's not really a plot hole. It is, however, a literal hole. ;)
7. Rey, who has never left her home planet since she was a child, can speak Wookie. Nobody can speak Wookie -- it's a running joke in the Star Wars universe. But Rey being able to speak Wookie surprises neither her, Han Solo, nor Chewbacca himself.
Can she? I honestly don't remember her answering Chewie, but I've only seen it once so I might have just missed it.
No, she doesn't answer, she merely understands what he said. Lots of people have that ability, including Han himself. This could mean she's well-read, but it could also just be a manifestation of The Force.
8. It's okay that Poe survived a Tie Fighter crash; after all, so did Finn. But has any film ever cared less about (a) giving the false impression a character has died, and then (b) having that character show up later with no one being surprised by it? Even Finn doesn't seem to care very much what the explanation is.
Did anyone actually believe Poe was dead? I would call that person naive.
Again, this is not actually a plot hole. Why would there need to be an explanation? There was no special way Finn survived, he simply woke up and walked away. Why would Poe not have been able to do the same thing? Apparently Star Wars universe airbags and chassis crumple zones are just hella good. The only thing Finn might reasonably wonder about is how Poe got away from the wreck and off of Jakku. Which, though I'm sure Finn might wonder about it in his head, isn't really necessary to go into for the purpose of advancing the film's plot.
11. Kylo Ren is the head of the Knights of Ren, but there are no other Knights of Ren in the movie.
Plot hole doesn't mean what he thinks it means, I don't think. Just because they're not in the movie doesn't mean they don't exist. Also he's wrong, as they're in Rey's vision.
So what? Why do they need to be in this movie? It's the first part of a trilogy, it NEEDS to set up mysteries precisely like this. Good grief, is this guy for real?
Also, who says Kylo's the head of the Knights? Maybe he's just a disciple. I think this person's assuming the Knights of Ren are named after Kylo, but remember that Kylo Ren is not his given name. It might be that he took the name AFTER joining this organization, to denote his membership.
12. Captain Phasma is supposed to be a big-deal character in The Force Awakens, if the merchandising and casting are any indication, and yet (a) how bad of a commanding officer do you have to be, how thoroughly inept in military tactics and strategy, to command the worst-trained fighting force in the Galaxy (the Stormtroopers hit even less with their blasters in The Force Awakens than in any preceding Star Wars film); (b) she's only in three scenes, in one of which she relays an order from Kylo Ren to initiate a massacre of innocents (hardcore!) and in another of which she immediately surrenders to Han, Rey, and Finn as soon as they encounter her and then does exactly everything they ask of her (pathetic!), making her character incomprehensible; and (c) in her third scene she effectively reveals that Finn's character is incomprehensible, as she notes that he has in fact been trained since birth to obey all orders, and has never in his life disobeyed even a single order until the day he decides to act like he's never been trained, indoctrinated, or dehumanized at all.
Okay, agreed, Phasma was underused and kindof stupid.
Yeah, she did seem pretty under-utilized TBH. Still, this is hardly a plot hole. Just something that maybe could have been fleshed out better, and it might be later. Maybe not in the films, but a character like that (who stands out but isn't delved into) is a perfect opportunity for some EU material.
14. Finn is an ex-janitor who goes AWOL from a Stormtrooper force numbering in the tens of thousands. Yet he is absolutely convinced, despite being someone of no importance whatsoever to the First Order, that he will be chased across the galaxy for having defected. Apparently, there's a premium on janitors in this quadrant of the Galaxy. Sure, Finn killed some people during his escape, but doesn't the First Order emphasize with every tactical decision it makes that it considers its soldiers thoroughly expendable, and don't they quite obviously have much bigger fish to fry during the events of The Force Awakens than to worry about Finn? Why wouldn't this be obvious to him?
Okay, he's a janitor. I don't think he's privy to all the First Order's grand plans. He's probably been indoctrinated to think that abandoning the First Order will lead to a manhunt and is the worst thing he could ever do. That's how ruling by fear works.
You nailed it. His initial characterization revolves around his fear of the First Order and desire to get away. That fear doesn't have to be entirely rational, in fact part of the schtick, I think, is that he is overly fearful.
On the other hand, maybe they do relentlessly hunt down the disobedient. We have no evidence to suggest otherwise. It's true that stormtroopers are considered disposable, but that only means their bosses don't care or feel remorse if they die. It does NOT mean that said bosses are content to let them go free, which might encourage others to do the same and lead to more disobedience. That's a pretty fantastic leap in logic, and indicative of someone who's just TRYING to make up faults IMO.
16. By the end of the movie, the impression is left that every single First Order soldier is dead besides Supreme Leader Snoke, General Hux, and Kylo Ren.
Are we given that impression? Was every single Imperial soldier killed aboard the first Death Star? I certainly wasn't given that impression.
I didn't think so. By "the impression is left," I think they mean "I assumed, based on no evidence other than having seen SOME of them die." ONCE AGAIN, how is this a plot hole? This is just devolving into a list of questions now, many of which are OK questions to have hanging in the air after the first film of a trilogy. Why do we need to know the exact number of troops left on each side? Even if this was a universe where number of troops mattered, that would be an OK question to leave for the next movie. But this is Star Wars, where only the major characters really matter. It always comes down to Jedi vs. Sith in the end.
17. Why does General Hux need to gather all of his troops just to tell them he's about to press a button and destroy the entire Republic? Can't he do that without a cattle-call of his entire army? Because it really ends badly for him, putting his entire army on the very planet he's about to make Resistance Target #1. No chance anybody saw that coming?
It's a dramatic show of force and probably some sort of morale booster for his troops. It's what they've been working for. Making a sort of ceremony around it isn't that peculiar.
Right. This seems pretty obvious. I agree that having everyone (though again, no evidence that it is actually "everyone") in one place is a tactical mistake, but how does that matter? What, movie characters don't make mistakes? This is just silly.
19. Why wasn't the Resistance able to access R2D2's data archives at any point over the course of the many years Luke was gone? Why did they, instead, simply prop him up in a corner, when they had to know that he knew Luke's whereabouts -- as he always has in the past?
It seemed pretty clear to me that Luke did something to him to make it impossible to retrieve that information until the time was right.
Yup. Duh. C-3PO specifically mentions that R2-D2 conveniently powered down around the time Luke disappeared. Seems pretty obvious that he was just waiting for the right time. And anyone who thinks that trying to hack R2-D2 would be a worthwhile endeavor is out of their mind. :P
21. Kylo Ren has such a Force-enabled sense of where his father is in the Galaxy that when his father lands on Starkiller Base, Ren immediately exclaims to himself, "Solo!" Yet a few minutes later, when Ren is just twenty feet from Solo, he can't detect him -- and actually starts searching for him in the wrong direction.
The exact same thing happens in A New Hope. Vader senses Obi-Wan's presence, but doesn't know exactly where he is
It's not a damn radar. Sheesh.
24. Rey says that the Millennium Falcon is "garbage" and hasn't been flown in many, many years. Indeed, it's such junk, in her view, that she won't even board it when she's about to be ripped to pieces by twenty Tie Fighters. Then she gets on board and it basically flies perfectly. So much so that it's not at all clear why no one has been flying it, let alone why its owner (Unkar Plutt) hasn't tried to sell it at any point over the past dozen years -- despite the fact that Plutt appears to live in a hovel.
It's the Millennium Falcon, that's sort of the running joke. Yeah, everyone thinks it's garbage, but it's not, and it's basically indestructible and just keeps on running. Also, maybe he hasn't sold it because to him it's like that rusted out, beat up '67 Mustang that he'll fix up "someday".
Oh FFS, now they're harping on the idea that the Millenium Falcon is more than it appears? Has this person ever seen a single Star Wars film? I don't even know how to respond to this.
25. Why does Plutt offer Rey 250 times her usual pay for BB-8 and then, when she says "no," simply tell some of his heavies to just steal it? If Plutt is enough of a baddie to order it stolen at all, why not just steal it from the outset instead of first offering some random urchin the biggest financial windfall she's ever seen?
Because it's often much, much easier to buy something than it is to take it by force. And more importantly, because that moment informs us on Rey's character more than her simply fighting a few dudes to protect him would.
Her normal pay is crap. 250 times that is still a piddly amount to him. It's pretty clear that he's the rich one here and everyone else is working for such small scraps that they're almost slaves. Also, he probably has to pay his goons, and I bet they're more expensive than the meager sustenance he gives the scavengers. So really, his initial offer not only represented less potential trouble, it likely would have been cheaper for him.
26. Maz Kanata is a friend to the Resistance. So why is she hiding Luke's light saber from them? Wouldn't she give them anything she could to help them find Luke, and doesn't it in fact turn out (as anyone could have supposed) that Luke's light saber is indeed helpful in tracking the last Jedi down?
Where was is said Maz Kanata is a friend to the Resistance? She's a friend of Han Solo, the smuggler, who doesn't have anything to do with the Resistance.
And anyway, you don't just give a lightsaber to any old goon. You wait for the right person.
29. Who trained Rey to fight with a staff as effectively as she does, given that (a) she is an orphan with no friends or family, and (b) she has never been in a battle, but is, rather, merely a scrap-metal scavenger?
That's an awful lot of assumption about someone we've know for all of five minutes of her 20-something year life. How do we know she's never been in a battle? In fact, I'd bet you're wrong and that she's had to fight plenty to survive on Jakku.
No one trained her. She's been surviving on her own in a lawless wasteland since she was a toddler, and we're surprised that she might have had to bash a few skulls?
30. If Finn is such a good guy that he would try to save Rey the moment he saw she was in distress, doesn't it further call into question just how in the world the order to kill civilians on Jakku was the first time he'd ever had qualms about doing something the First Order had asked him to do?
Again, he was a garbage-man. It seemed pretty clear that was the first time he'd seen combat.
Also, can I just say that bit where Finn starts going to help her, and then she just beats the guys down on her own, was great? Aside from being funny, it established early on who Rey is.
31. Given that all Poe knows about Finn is that he's a First Order defector, why does he seem happy to see Finn just seconds after (and perhaps as) BB-8 tells him Finn is alive? There's no real reason for Poe to trust Finn -- or care about his well-being -- at all. Rather, he would assume, as anyone would, that whatever Finn did or did not do on Jakku, he surely had committed other atrocities for the First Order (and killed many a Resistance fighter) before then.
You wouldn't be happy to see the person that saved your life?
33. Why does Kylo Ren assign just a single Stormtrooper to guard Rey, the most valuable prisoner in the history of the First Order?
Why wouldn't he? She's locked up pretty securely.
He felt it was the correct course of action. Sometimes The Force works towards its own ends, and just uses people.
34. How do the Rathtars on Han's freighter get loose? If he's just keeping them loose in the hanger, why don't they kill him when he's walking through the freighter toward the Millennium Falcon, or at any other time? And if he's got them chained up, how do they escape?
That's literally explained in the movie. Pay attention instead of trying to find things to point out on the internet.
Seriously, there's a whole bit of dialogue whose only purpose is to lead up to them being released. Did they even see the movie?
36. Why are all Stormtroopers human (or humanoid)? If by the time of the First Order any clones being raised to be Stormtroopers are no longer clones of Jango Fett, why aren't there now Stormtroopers of every species as well as every (human) race? Why aren't there flying Stormtroopers from the same species as, say, Watto (from The Phantom Menace)?
I guess maybe it's not canon anymore, but the Empire used to be basically a bunch of racists and didn't want anything to do with anyone that wasn't human.
The same reason that Nazis were all white Germans. Sheltered childhood much?
37. If basically everyone in the Galaxy knows the Force is not a myth -- for instance, every single Stormtrooper in the First Order, who has seen Kylo Ren use it or heard tell of him using it; every single person in the Resistance, who knows the Resistance is looking for Luke Skywalker; every single person in the Republic, which was first established in part by the heroism of the Jedis -- how is the existence of the Force a total shock to Rey? Jakku is sheltered, but as we know from the film (cf. Lor San Tekka) there are many people on Jakku who either have seen the Force first-hand or heard first-hand accounts of it from visitors to the planet.
I've seen this point a lot, too. What it boils down to, I think, is that not many knew about the Force to begin with, and the Empire spent the better part of 40 years erasing the Jedi and the Force from history books everywhere. In A New Hope, people that worked directly with Vader didn't believe in the Force.I also get the impression that not many people know the full legacy of Luke Skywalker. The only one that knows what happened in the second Death Star is Luke anyone that Luke happened to tell, which probably only amounts to Leia and Han.
It's pretty much a Star Wars trope at this point that the Sith always set about trying to erase the legacy of the Jedi. And they're not the only ones. The Jedi ban certain Sith knowledge and artifacts.
TL:DR; the author of this piece is bad and he should feel bad (and pay more attention the movies he's trying to bash online).
TBH I think he should pay LESS attention and just try to enjoy the friggin' story.
Actually: *SPOILERS*
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 15:46 (3262 days ago) @ cheapLEY
Did anyone actually believe Poe was dead? I would call that person naive.
Um.... *Raises hand*
Actually: *SPOILERS*
by Cody Miller , Music of the Spheres - Never Forgot, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 16:06 (3262 days ago) @ Ragashingo
Did anyone actually believe Poe was dead? I would call that person naive.
Um.... *Raises hand*
If you don't see the body, they are still alive. My years of watching General Hospital have taught me that.
Actually: *SPOILERS*
by Korny , Dalton, Ga. US. Earth, Sol System, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 17:25 (3262 days ago) @ Cody Miller
Did anyone actually believe Poe was dead? I would call that person naive.
Um.... *Raises hand*
If you don't see the body, they are still alive. My years of watching General Hospital have taught me that.
Also, he found Poe's jacket outside of the fighter. It was pretty obvious to the viewer that he wasn't inside, but Finn wouldn't have thought about this with everything going on.
Actually: *SPOILERS*
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 22:33 (3262 days ago) @ Korny
I'm pretty sure it was inside, Korny. Still doesn't invalidate Cody's "absolute" in any way.
Actually: *SPOILERS*
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 22:37 (3262 days ago) @ Cody Miller
I know, I know. And he seemed to major of a character to kill off but after a while I was like, "Eh... I guess he's dead..." only to realize who it was during that great looping Tie Fighter shoot down scene. (Yeah... I couldn't tell it was him in the shot before that of him in the X-Wing cockpit... I suck at identifying actors... especially in flight helmets...)
Actually: *SPOILERS*
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 17:35 (3262 days ago) @ cheapLEY
So, not a refutation of every point, just most of them.
3. Kylo Ren, a powerful Force-user, fights a light saber duel with an ex-janitor who has never held a light saber and yet (a) never uses the Force on his opponent, though doing so would have ended the duel immediately, and (b) barely wins the fight, suggesting that he is simultaneously one of the least strategic wielders of the Force the Dark Side has ever seen and, despite his training, absolutely terrible with a light saber. None of this stops Kylo Ren from designing and building his own, completely impractical cross-barred lightsaber.
I see this complaint all the time, and it's stupid. He handily wins the fight against Finn; it's not even close. Keep in mind that he's wounded. But how do we know what Finn's training is? Finn fights another Stormtrooper with that electrified club thing; maybe Finn has trained with that thing? He handled himself alright in that fight, so it's a possibility.Also, Kylo Ren is powerful. He doesn't need to use the Force to dispatch a Stormtrooper. We also don't know how much training he's actually had with a lightsaber. He's not anywhere close to as proficient as Vader was, but everyone seems to think he's already this super bad ass villian when the movie pretty clearly shows us he's not.
Yeah I actually think Kylo was toying with him up until the point that Finn grazes his shoulder. After that Kylo destroys Finn.
Actually: *SPOILERS*
by Korny , Dalton, Ga. US. Earth, Sol System, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 17:56 (3262 days ago) @ cheapLEY
So, not a refutation of every point, just most of them.
3. Kylo Ren, a powerful Force-user, fights a light saber duel with an ex-janitor who has never held a light saber and yet (a) never uses the Force on his opponent, though doing so would have ended the duel immediately, and (b) barely wins the fight, suggesting that he is simultaneously one of the least strategic wielders of the Force the Dark Side has ever seen and, despite his training, absolutely terrible with a light saber. None of this stops Kylo Ren from designing and building his own, completely impractical cross-barred lightsaber.
I see this complaint all the time, and it's stupid. He handily wins the fight against Finn; it's not even close. Keep in mind that he's wounded. But how do we know what Finn's training is? Finn fights another Stormtrooper with that electrified club thing; maybe Finn has trained with that thing? He handled himself alright in that fight, so it's a possibility.
Even if you end up scrubbing toilets in the Marines, you still have to go to boot camp... These stormtroopers are shown to be proficient in hand-to hand combat with their zappy clubs, and it's even more clear since Finn's lightsaber technique involves mostly hacking at the opponent (as one would do with a club).
Also, Kylo Ren is powerful. He doesn't need to use the Force to dispatch a Stormtrooper. We also don't know how much training he's actually had with a lightsaber. He's not anywhere close to as proficient as Vader was, but everyone seems to think he's already this super bad ass villian when the movie pretty clearly shows us he's not.
They cast a frail-looking dude to play a troubled kid who likely felt weak and underwhelming all his life, but found power and strength in the dark side. He's very proficient at using the Force, but is mediocre at actual combat. That's a neat bit of characterization, I thought... And he's still in training, since he's not yet a Sith.
4. Rey becomes nearly as effective a Force-user in a few hours as Luke Skywalker did in a few years.
I think that's intentional, and it's supposed to show us both that Rey is very powerful with the Force and that Kylo Ren isn't as well-trained and badass as he thinks he is.
Also, she grew up around fighting and dealing with lowlifes. She knows that people aren't as powerful or as intimidating as they act. Plus, she is imitative when it comes to using the force. She learns from what Kylo does.
7. Rey, who has never left her home planet since she was a child, can speak Wookie. Nobody can speak Wookie -- it's a running joke in the Star Wars universe. But Rey being able to speak Wookie surprises neither her, Han Solo, nor Chewbacca himself.
Can she? I honestly don't remember her answering Chewie, but I've only seen it once so I might have just missed it.
She understood him, but never spoke Wookie. And it's not a "running joke", if each film showed that multiple people understood him (Lando, the medic, Yoda, C3PO, Han). In fact, I can't think of any instance where the joke was that a person couldn't understand him...
Either way, she grew up in an outpost full of weird low-class aliens. Odds are she would meet a Wookie or two in her life.
8. It's okay that Poe survived a Tie Fighter crash; after all, so did Finn. But has any film ever cared less about (a) giving the false impression a character has died, and then (b) having that character show up later with no one being surprised by it? Even Finn doesn't seem to care very much what the explanation is.
Did anyone actually believe Poe was dead? I would call that person naive.
Answered below, but yeah, folks should learn movie rules...
11. Kylo Ren is the head of the Knights of Ren, but there are no other Knights of Ren in the movie.
Plot hole doesn't mean what he thinks it means, I don't think. Just because they're not in the movie doesn't mean they don't exist. Also he's wrong, as they're in Rey's vision.
12. Captain Phasma is supposed to be a big-deal character in The Force Awakens, if the merchandising and casting are any indication, and yet (a) how bad of a commanding officer do you have to be, how thoroughly inept in military tactics and strategy, to command the worst-trained fighting force in the Galaxy (the Stormtroopers hit even less with their blasters in The Force Awakens than in any preceding Star Wars film); (b) she's only in three scenes, in one of which she relays an order from Kylo Ren to initiate a massacre of innocents (hardcore!) and in another of which she immediately surrenders to Han, Rey, and Finn as soon as they encounter her and then does exactly everything they ask of her (pathetic!), making her character incomprehensible; and (c) in her third scene she effectively reveals that Finn's character is incomprehensible, as she notes that he has in fact been trained since birth to obey all orders, and has never in his life disobeyed even a single order until the day he decides to act like he's never been trained, indoctrinated, or dehumanized at all.
Okay, agreed, Phasma was underused and kindof stupid.
I feel like she maybe had more scenes explaining her and her actions (Finn seems to really hate her in particular), but that may be for later...
13. Really? Was there no previous order Finn had ever refused to execute? Was the slaughter on Jakku actually the first naughty thing the First Order had ever required of him?
Well, he's a space garbage man, so maybe?
14. Finn is an ex-janitor who goes AWOL from a Stormtrooper force numbering in the tens of thousands. Yet he is absolutely convinced, despite being someone of no importance whatsoever to the First Order, that he will be chased across the galaxy for having defected. Apparently, there's a premium on janitors in this quadrant of the Galaxy. Sure, Finn killed some people during his escape, but doesn't the First Order emphasize with every tactical decision it makes that it considers its soldiers thoroughly expendable, and don't they quite obviously have much bigger fish to fry during the events of The Force Awakens than to worry about Finn? Why wouldn't this be obvious to him?
Okay, he's a janitor. I don't think he's privy to all the First Order's grand plans. He's probably been indoctrinated to think that abandoning the First Order will lead to a manhunt and is the worst thing he could ever do. That's how ruling by fear works.
I thought that they'd come after him for freeing the most valuable prisoner that they had gotten their hands on, and escaping with him after killing multiple stormtroopers and doing thousands (if not millions) of credits worth of damage to their ships and equipment, then stealing another ship with the Droid that was vital to their plans... I dunno, I'd think that would be enough to put a bit of a target on my back...
16. By the end of the movie, the impression is left that every single First Order soldier is dead besides Supreme Leader Snoke, General Hux, and Kylo Ren.
Are we given that impression? Was every single Imperial soldier killed aboard the first Death Star? I certainly wasn't given that impression.
The specifically started to evacuate a number of their folks. Stands to reason that many of their soldiers had just been in orbit, or off system. Each imperial starship holds thousands and thousands of crewmembers. Why would all of them unload onto the habitable outposts on the giant ice planet?
29. Who trained Rey to fight with a staff as effectively as she does, given that (a) she is an orphan with no friends or family, and (b) she has never been in a battle, but is, rather, merely a scrap-metal scavenger?
That's an awful lot of assumption about someone we've know for all of five minutes of her 20-something year life. How do we know she's never been in a battle? In fact, I'd bet you're wrong and that she's had to fight plenty to survive on Jakku.
She is very proficient with her zappy spear/staff that she's clearly had for years. I like that it carried over to her fighting with a lightsaber, as she focused on wide swings and jabs, as one would with a staff.
31. Given that all Poe knows about Finn is that he's a First Order defector, why does he seem happy to see Finn just seconds after (and perhaps as) BB-8 tells him Finn is alive? There's no real reason for Poe to trust Finn -- or care about his well-being -- at all. Rather, he would assume, as anyone would, that whatever Finn did or did not do on Jakku, he surely had committed other atrocities for the First Order (and killed many a Resistance fighter) before then.
You wouldn't be happy to see the person that saved your life?
Not only that, but he honored your absence by completing your super-important mission. I'd be pretty stoked.
33. Why does Kylo Ren assign just a single Stormtrooper to guard Rey, the most valuable prisoner in the history of the First Order?
Why wouldn't he? She's locked up pretty securely.
And he had no idea that she would be able to use the force to control minds. She failed at it the first couple of times...
34. How do the Rathtars on Han's freighter get loose? If he's just keeping them loose in the hanger, why don't they kill him when he's walking through the freighter toward the Millennium Falcon, or at any other time? And if he's got them chained up, how do they escape?
That's literally explained in the movie. Pay attention instead of trying to find things to point out on the internet.
Deer Lorde...
36. Why are all Stormtroopers human (or humanoid)? If by the time of the First Order any clones being raised to be Stormtroopers are no longer clones of Jango Fett, why aren't there now Stormtroopers of every species as well as every (human) race? Why aren't there flying Stormtroopers from the same species as, say, Watto (from The Phantom Menace)?
I guess maybe it's not canon anymore, but the Empire used to be basically a bunch of racists and didn't want anything to do with anyone that wasn't human.
The First Order is Cerberus... I can get that...
37. If basically everyone in the Galaxy knows the Force is not a myth -- for instance, every single Stormtrooper in the First Order, who has seen Kylo Ren use it or heard tell of him using it; every single person in the Resistance, who knows the Resistance is looking for Luke Skywalker; every single person in the Republic, which was first established in part by the heroism of the Jedis -- how is the existence of the Force a total shock to Rey? Jakku is sheltered, but as we know from the film (cf. Lor San Tekka) there are many people on Jakku who either have seen the Force first-hand or heard first-hand accounts of it from visitors to the planet.
I've seen this point a lot, too. What it boils down to, I think, is that not many knew about the Force to begin with, and the Empire spent the better part of 40 years erasing the Jedi and the Force from history books everywhere. In A New Hope, people that worked directly with Vader didn't believe in the Force.
Would you be aware if an actual psychic lived in a small town near you? Or would stories of psychics seem like fairy tales and lies?
There were hundreds (if not thousands) of planets, people's, and cultures that likely had never seen a Force user, much less one of our heroes...
I also get the impression that not many people know the full legacy of Luke Skywalker. The only one that knows what happened in the second Death Star is Luke anyone that Luke happened to tell, which probably only amounts to Leia and Han.TL:DR; the author of this piece is bad and he should feel bad (and pay more attention the movies he's trying to bash online).
Yeah, it's a nitpicky click bait article written by some disgruntled moron. I wouldn't put too much stock into it.
Perhaps I can no longer feel joy.
by SonofMacPhisto , Thursday, December 24, 2015, 05:07 (3260 days ago) @ Avateur
*eye roll*
Articles like this are like money changers in the temple. Flip the tables and be done with them. :P
Heh :)
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Thursday, December 24, 2015, 06:02 (3260 days ago) @ SonofMacPhisto
- No text -
Perhaps I can no longer feel joy.
by Avateur , Friday, December 25, 2015, 04:40 (3259 days ago) @ SonofMacPhisto
It was a pretty fun article! It's good to see this stuff, you know? It can be refuted, laughed at, and/or agreed with. I've now seen this movie twice, taking this article and other things in mind, and still thoroughly loved this movie. It's a great time. :D
Welcome to Star Wars.
by Funkmon , Thursday, December 24, 2015, 15:49 (3260 days ago) @ Bones
- No text -
It was alright.
by Quirel, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 05:05 (3262 days ago) @ Avateur
edited by Quirel, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 05:27
There were some great parts in there, and a bit where style won out over substance. There were a number of extraneous factors that prevented me from enjoying the movie this time around, and I hope to see it again soon with my brother.
My opinion of JJ Abrams has not changed, and I am thankful that he will not be returning for the sequel.
I'll post my full thoughts tomorrow, after work.
I just wish that adult-me enjoyed it as much as my inner child did.
Finally saw it last night.
by Claude Errera , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 17:39 (3262 days ago) @ Avateur
I can finally read this thread. :)
Gotta say - wasn't really impressed. It was a fun couple of hours, don't get me wrong; I don't feel like I wasted my money. Good company, good food, comfortable seats, lots of funny in-jokes.
The movie, as a whole, though... left me pretty cold.
It almost seemed like a reboot of A New Hope - almost every scene was a reimagination of a scene from that movie. (Well, okay, there were bits pulled in from Empire Strikes Back, too.) It was well filmed, it flowed nicely, I laughed - but I never became invested in any characters. It was throwaway fluff, for the most part.
And as much as folks have been poo-poohing that '40 terrible plot holes' article, there WERE a ton of plot holes, some of which weren't even on that list.
Eh. Whatever. If you loved it, great. If you were entertained but don't really care much about it at this point... I'm in your boat.
Finally saw it last night. *SP*
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 19:45 (3262 days ago) @ Claude Errera
I can finally read this thread. :)
Gotta say - wasn't really impressed. It was a fun couple of hours, don't get me wrong; I don't feel like I wasted my money. Good company, good food, comfortable seats, lots of funny in-jokes.
The movie, as a whole, though... left me pretty cold.
It almost seemed like a reboot of A New Hope - almost every scene was a reimagination of a scene from that movie. (Well, okay, there were bits pulled in from Empire Strikes Back, too.) It was well filmed, it flowed nicely, I laughed - but I never became invested in any characters. It was throwaway fluff, for the most part.
And as much as folks have been poo-poohing that '40 terrible plot holes' article, there WERE a ton of plot holes, some of which weren't even on that list.
Eh. Whatever. If you loved it, great. If you were entertained but don't really care much about it at this point... I'm in your boat.
Judged against the prequels, I thought it was amazing. (I realize how bad it could be and that statement still be true.) Otherwise, yeah, I found myself detached, too. Something got in my eye (literally) around the time Han bought it, and my friend gripped my shoulder thinking I was upset, but I was more like, well, here is when the old mentor is killed by the evil guy in black and the new hero witnesses this from a distance. (It truly followed A New Hope beat by beat.) Chewie's reaction affected me a little more, but it wasn't until the final scene that I was verklempt. I don't know why exactly. One thing I really like about The Force Awakens is what it doesn't tell you. Excellent use of Hamill. Good use of Harrison Ford. Mediocre use of Carrie Fisher. She might as well have been knitting. I wanted some of that old sass.
My opinion isn't settled. Going to see in 2D so I can actually focus, and I'll see how I feel after that.
Biggest plot-hole in the movie that irked me beyond reason
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 22:41 (3262 days ago) @ Claude Errera
If she's getting quarter-rations a day, why the fuck did she spill it off the damn bowl?!
Biggest plot-hole in the movie that irked me beyond reason
by cheapLEY , Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 22:47 (3262 days ago) @ ZackDark
If she's getting quarter-rations a day, why the fuck did she spill it off the damn bowl?!
Heh, that bugged me too.
And when that scene where she's drinking water and half of it ends up on her face.
Finally saw it last night.
by CYBRFRK , Phoenix, AZ, Thursday, January 07, 2016, 18:12 (3246 days ago) @ Claude Errera
My thoughts exactly.
And when I posted it on FB (https://www.facebook.com/jesimpson/posts/10153852767450477) it wasn't well received.
Don't worry. History will be on your side, CYBR.
by Funkmon , Thursday, January 07, 2016, 18:13 (3246 days ago) @ CYBRFRK
- No text -
Only if Episode VIII does nothing special
by Avateur , Friday, January 08, 2016, 15:30 (3245 days ago) @ Funkmon
Otherwise, in context, VII might be viewed quite well by history.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Thursday, December 24, 2015, 16:18 (3260 days ago) @ Avateur
edited by CruelLEGACEY, Thursday, December 24, 2015, 16:21
So I've now seen about half of the movie (yes, I'm one of those horrible people who downloaded it but only because I've been trying to see it in the theater since opening day and things keep going wrong and I finally do have tickets to watch it next week but I just can't wait that long to see it so please don't hate me).
A lot has been said about how derivative it is, and I have to agree. I literally guessed every major plot point over a month ago, after the trailers first launched. I don't say that to brag, but rather to point out how thoroughly predictable the movie is. But I'm ok with that. I have no problem with lack of surprises in a movie, as long as the movie isn't relying on the element of surprise as part of its entertainment value.
As for the movie itself, I think there is a lot to like or even love about it. I find Rey totally captivating, the scenery is gorgeous, the overall feel and tone is almost perfect... well, not exactly. There is something about this movie that feels very off to me. Took me a while to figure out what was bothering me, but I've come to realize that I have the same feeling while watching The Force Awakens as I did while watching Star Trek Into Darkness: the movie doesn't "breath". Characters race from plot point to plot point, location to location, without ever pausing for a moment to reflect on what has happened or what is going to happen. Because of this, the audience doesn't have time either. It's as is Abrams is so terrified of including a single dull moment in the film that he just crams it full of "events" and cuts out absolutely everything in between.
Without a sense of time passing between the major events, it feels like the most insanely unlikely train of coincidences known to man. This person just happens to arrive at the exact same time as these other people, who manage to barely escape thanks to running into this other person, who stumbles across that thing that these other people have been searching for and then they actually find it the moment those other people escape from the bad people... It's just too much to believe (and I have a very flexible suspension of disbelief).
So far, The Force Awakens, much like Into Darkness, feels like fan fiction to me. It's a movie made by huge Star Wars fans who have come up with a bunch of cool "Star Wars-y" moments and strung them together using the exact same plot as the original. Unlike Into Darkness, I think The Force Awakens does a good job of recapturing or recreating much of the original magic. I'm just having a tough time seeing it as a true "sequel" to the Star Wars franchise. It really does feel more like a remake/reboot to me. But enjoyable none the less.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by cheapLEY , Thursday, December 24, 2015, 17:05 (3260 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
I'll respond to this more fully later when I have more time to compose a post, but I do agree that the film doesn't have enough downtime. I think the film could be drastically improved with an extra thirty minutes to work with, and that's not something I often find myself saying about films that are already over two hours.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Thursday, December 24, 2015, 18:21 (3260 days ago) @ cheapLEY
I'll respond to this more fully later when I have more time to compose a post, but I do agree that the film doesn't have enough downtime. I think the film could be drastically improved with an extra thirty minutes to work with, and that's not something I often find myself saying about films that are already over two hours.
I haven't finished it yet, but so far that's the feel I'm getting from it as well. So many of my favorite moments in Star Wars are when the camera just follows a character for a moment as they stare off at the sunset and the music has time to do its thing. Not much of that in The Force Awakens so far.
A more in depth reply, once you've seen it *SPOILERS*
by cheapLEY , Thursday, December 24, 2015, 23:56 (3260 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
I'm going to see it on Saturday for the second time; I'm looking forward to seeing how it plays out on a repeat viewing.
I've seen a lot of folks complaining about it being a "remake" and reusing story elements from previous films. Initially, I was struck by the same thing, and a bit disappointed. The one element I still don't really like so much is Starkiller base amounting to another Death Star. I just don't feel like it makes all that much sense.
The rest of the reused story elements I have actually come to like, because I think they work well, and it speaks to the general themes of Star Wars. Episode 1 reused a lot of the themes of A New Hope (the young kid wanting to get away, the death of a mentor, the typical Hero's journey stuff). The Force Awakens obviously reuses the same elements, and I don't think that's a problem. It's a cycle that will continue.
Then you obviously have the ancient, wise being in Maz Kanata, mirroring Yoda from Empire, setting Rey on her quest by giving her the lightsaber.
My absolute favorite thing, though, is the encounter between Han and Kylo Ren. It is the exact same as the encounter between Vader and Luke in Empire Strikes back; a father tries to get his son to join him. Initially, I didn't really like the scene very much, but I've come to really appreciate and love the way it was done, making it echo almost exactly the scene from Empire. And it's a two for one, as it also echos the scene from A New Hope, where the hero witnesses the death of her mentor at the hands of the antagonist.
At the end of the day, I understand the issues some have with retreading old story elements, but they worked so well for me that I don't mind (in fact I've come to love the way it was done). It seems more respectful than just outright copying to me.
As a side note, I saw a post on reddit the other day that I loved. I doubt it'll end up being true, but I liked the thought:
Basically, it theorized that after Return of the Jedi, Luke swore off combat and vowed to never again wield a lightsaber. He built his Jedi academy on the basis of becoming one with the Force and achieving peace, not teaching combat skills, but instead focusing on meditation and the sorts of things that Qui-Gon taught Yoda and Obi-Wan after his death. This would perhaps go towards explaining why Kylo Ren's lightsaber is so unstable. He was never taught how to build one, and was only able to piece one together perhaps from some old holocrons or other Jedi/Sith records he was able to discover.
So when Rey holds out Anakin's lightsaber to Luke, she isn't only asking for training, she is asking him to break a vow he made, and to perhaps even take up arms against yet another family member, which is the reason he made a vow in the first place.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by Avateur , Friday, December 25, 2015, 05:36 (3259 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
I'd like to begin by saying that I think it's unfortunate that you're rushing to judgment without having seen the whole thing yet. I'm not invalidating what you've said, though. It's just that the complete movie and experience could absolutely change your overall impressions, including those of the first half that you've seen.
Having said that, probably my biggest complaint about the movie is in regards to how much "smaller" the universe feels based on the pacing you mentioned. There isn't a lot of time for people to breathe, so it definitely seems like a ton of really jacked up coincidences and plot holes. Things just seem to be places in an instant, and that is absolutely a problem with Into Darkness, too. I'd love to go into more detail on this point, but you haven't seen certain parts yet that really nail this critique on the head.
Now, having said all of that, the pace of the movie is also one of its greatest assets, especially now that I've seen it a second time. The pace was one thing I was saying was of great benefit after my first viewing, and now that I've come to terms with the fact that Abrams just poorly directed how much time/distance things go down in, I can further suspend my disbelief and allow myself to realize that there really is a lot more time taking place and a lot less coincidence than seems implied. The second viewing was definitely as much if not more so enjoyable. I'm also glad that Abrams will be off of VIII so that the pacing issues, among other problems, can be fixed (hopefully).
As for a remake/reboot, I like calling this a soft reboot of IV. And I think it works very well. It's just a really good time. Beyond your just finishing the movie, I can't wait for you to go see it in theater and see how you feel about it then. If you feel the same, hey, more power to you. There are plenty of valid criticisms, and this is not a perfect movie. It still somehow works. I'm ranking it just below or right with Jedi.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Friday, December 25, 2015, 12:06 (3259 days ago) @ Avateur
edited by CruelLEGACEY, Friday, December 25, 2015, 12:11
I'd like to begin by saying that I think it's unfortunate that you're rushing to judgment without having seen the whole thing yet. I'm not invalidating what you've said, though. It's just that the complete movie and experience could absolutely change your overall impressions, including those of the first half that you've seen.
Not rushing to judgment, just commenting on what I've seen so far. In most cases, the first half of a movie is more than enough to get a feel for how the director is handling pacing and flow :)
Having said that, probably my biggest complaint about the movie is in regards to how much "smaller" the universe feels based on the pacing you mentioned. There isn't a lot of time for people to breathe, so it definitely seems like a ton of really jacked up coincidences and plot holes. Things just seem to be places in an instant, and that is absolutely a problem with Into Darkness, too. I'd love to go into more detail on this point, but you haven't seen certain parts yet that really nail this critique on the head.
I've now seen the whole movie, and I think I know exactly which parts you're talking about. But maybe not. There are so many crazy coincidences in this movie, I might get hung up on different moments than the next person. I did catch myself rolling my eyes when Han finds the Falcon immediately after it leaves Jakku. But then also when the resistance just happened to show up as the first order attacked. Just about everything about the Starkiller base seemed pretty ridiculous to me, too.
Now, having said all of that, the pace of the movie is also one of its greatest assets, especially now that I've seen it a second time. The pace was one thing I was saying was of great benefit after my first viewing, and now that I've come to terms with the fact that Abrams just poorly directed how much time/distance things go down in, I can further suspend my disbelief and allow myself to realize that there really is a lot more time taking place and a lot less coincidence than seems implied. The second viewing was definitely as much if not more so enjoyable. I'm also glad that Abrams will be off of VIII so that the pacing issues, among other problems, can be fixed (hopefully).
Yeah I can totally see that being the case. Any time I see a movie with elements I love and other elements that really bother me, I'm usually able to have more fun with it the 2nd or 3rd time through. And I do think Abrams got a lot right with this one, it's just mostly stuff that doesn't have much payoff in this film. If nothing else, I think we've got a great group of characters set to take the series forward.
As for a remake/reboot, I like calling this a soft reboot of IV. And I think it works very well. It's just a really good time. Beyond your just finishing the movie, I can't wait for you to go see it in theater and see how you feel about it then. If you feel the same, hey, more power to you. There are plenty of valid criticisms, and this is not a perfect movie. It still somehow works. I'm ranking it just below or right with Jedi.
I can't wait to see it in theatres, mostly for the audio/visual presentation. JJ's movies always look spectacular, and TFA is no exception :)
It's too soon for me to really know how I'd rank this one compared to the other 6. It's certainly below Jedi and Empire for me, possibly below RotS as well. I might put it just above or just below A New Hope. I think it's better than ANH in many ways, but it's also so derivative that I can't really give it full credit. But really I'll need to see how I feel about it after a few months, when it's had time to fully sink in.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Friday, December 25, 2015, 16:11 (3259 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
I did catch myself rolling my eyes when Han finds the Falcon immediately after it leaves Jakku.
Same. Hell, I found myself rolling my eyes when it wasn't the Star Destroyer in the first place, nevermind Solo.
But then also when the resistance just happened to show up as the first order attacked.
To be fair, the Resistance was informed of BB-8 at right about the same second the First Order was.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by Avateur , Friday, December 25, 2015, 16:40 (3259 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
I've now seen the whole movie, and I think I know exactly which parts you're talking about. But maybe not. There are so many crazy coincidences in this movie, I might get hung up on different moments than the next person. I did catch myself rolling my eyes when Han finds the Falcon immediately after it leaves Jakku. But then also when the resistance just happened to show up as the first order attacked. Just about everything about the Starkiller base seemed pretty ridiculous to me, too.
It's assumed that the Falcon just blew straight out of Jakku and escaped the Empire, but the way Han just shows up makes it seem like they exited atmosphere and immediately got picked up. It's ridiculous timing as far as the filming goes.
Or take the point where Starkiller Base fires and takes out five planets all within view of each other apparently. It's okay if they didn't show us the Starkiller Base charging up elsewhere, but just a scene or two ago, they were saying how the Republic was in some system somewhere needing to be dealt with, and then bam, it's right there in that system. How much time has passed between this thing traveling places? It also was conveniently in the system of the resistance base when it started sucking up that final star in the movie. When did it go there? A lot of whack time jumps that are not conveyed very well at all.
I can't wait to see it in theatres, mostly for the audio/visual presentation. JJ's movies always look spectacular, and TFA is no exception :)
No joke. It does really well in theater!
Here's a question for you *The Force Awakens Spoilers*
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Friday, December 25, 2015, 22:38 (3259 days ago) @ Avateur
Or take the point where Starkiller Base fires and takes out five planets all within view of each other apparently.
So about that... Did they just blow up Curosant? The skyline looked similar, and Curosant has always been the galactic capital. It's not a stretch to assume the new Republic would be based there. Either way, the Starkiller Base destroys 5 worlds, killing who knows how many billions, and the movie moves right along to the next plot point. We get virtually no reaction from any of the characters, no outrage or sorrow... it's just on to the next thing. I found that whole section of the movie a bit confusing, to be honest (for many of the reasons you mentioned in your post).
Here's a question for you *The Force Awakens Spoilers*
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Friday, December 25, 2015, 23:26 (3259 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
Several of us think no. Some other star system / planet was named.
Here's a question for you *The Force Awakens Spoilers*
by cheapLEY , Saturday, December 26, 2015, 17:40 (3258 days ago) @ Ragashingo
It was confirmed that it was not Coruscant. The Republic relocated to the Hosnian system. I can't recall if they say that at any point in the film, or if it comes from the novelization or what. I'll see if I can find a source when I get home.
I do agree that that part of the movie is confusing and devoid of any impact. It's nowhere near as powerful as the destruction of Alderaan.
Here's a question for you *The Force Awakens Spoilers*
by breitzen , Kansas, Friday, December 25, 2015, 23:38 (3259 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
I've heard that after the fall of the Empire, the senate was recreated elsewhere in the system. Can't remember where I heard that tho.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Saturday, December 26, 2015, 17:46 (3258 days ago) @ Avateur
Or take the point where Starkiller Base fires and takes out five planets all within view of each other apparently. It's okay if they didn't show us the Starkiller Base charging up elsewhere, but just a scene or two ago, they were saying how the Republic was in some system somewhere needing to be dealt with, and then bam, it's right there in that system. How much time has passed between this thing traveling places? It also was conveniently in the system of the resistance base when it started sucking up that final star in the movie. When did it go there? A lot of whack time jumps that are not conveyed very well at all.
Part of the upping the ante in this movies is that the Starkiller doesn't need to be in the system to kill a planet. It's weapon fires through hyperspace (they mention it briefly), so the Starkiller base only needs to get near a new star to suck up.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Saturday, December 26, 2015, 17:58 (3258 days ago) @ Xenos
So the Starkiller was mobile? If I were the bad guys I'd park by the star of one enemy, vacuum it up (Megamaid?!), then use it to blast a second enemy.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Saturday, December 26, 2015, 18:05 (3258 days ago) @ Ragashingo
So the Starkiller was mobile? If I were the bad guys I'd park by the star of one enemy, vacuum it up (Megamaid?!), then use it to blast a second enemy.
Honestly that part I'm not clear on. Maybe it can suck up a star from a pretty large distance, I just assumed it must move to get in place to suck one up. Otherwise it would have a pretty limited number of fires.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by marmot 1333 , Saturday, December 26, 2015, 21:53 (3258 days ago) @ Xenos
So, is it a planet? I thought it was made out of a planet. Do they drive a planet through space?
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by cheapLEY , Saturday, December 26, 2015, 22:42 (3258 days ago) @ marmot 1333
So, is it a planet? I thought it was made out of a planet. Do they drive a planet through space?
Yes, I guess so. I mean, it's never really stated, but it has to be mobile, or able to someone suck up stars from other systems for fuel.
I mean, it's a giant weapon that sucks up stars and shoots them out to blow up planets. Making it also be mobile doesn't really make it any less believable than it already is. :P
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by Avateur , Saturday, December 26, 2015, 22:56 (3258 days ago) @ Xenos
Holy cow, are you for real? No one I know has been able to take that base's movements seriously. But it fires through hyperspace? Do you know around where they mention that? Definitely gotta see the movie again now... :D
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Saturday, December 26, 2015, 23:52 (3258 days ago) @ Avateur
They talk about it during the planning meeting on how to take it down. You can confirm it on Wookiepedia or in the novelization as well I'm sure.
Confirmed. In novelization. Can go FTL.
by Funkmon , Sunday, December 27, 2015, 00:19 (3258 days ago) @ Xenos
- No text -
Confirmed. In novelization. Can go FTL.
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Sunday, December 27, 2015, 01:34 (3258 days ago) @ Funkmon
Rationally, I knew that's what was going on, but the visualization made it a bit confusing. We saw the blast leaving the Starkiller and s-l-o-w-l-y pass across the viewport of Ren's Star Destroyer.
Confirmed. In novelization. Can go FTL.
by cheapLEY , Sunday, December 27, 2015, 01:43 (3258 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
Yep, my biggest issue with movie is that scene in particular. It's just confusing and doesn't really have any emotional payoff. It's got a few cool shots (seeing it fire from the close-up on the ground level, and watching the beam shoot through the sky and hit the planets), but I'll be damned if I really understood what was happening.
Confirmed. In novelization. Can go FTL.
by Avateur , Sunday, December 27, 2015, 04:52 (3257 days ago) @ cheapLEY
I thought I did, but clearly not. I just thought the thing arrived in-system, fired, Kylo watched it, and then it hit all of its targets. Definitely not conveyed well visually at all. That could have been handled way better. The thought of that blast traveling FTL is freaking awesome, but what horrible execution on screen!
Also confirmed in the movie
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Sunday, December 27, 2015, 13:59 (3257 days ago) @ Funkmon
It's REALLY played down, but they do say multiple times it's "superluminal" or something.
The Hell it can.
by Quirel, Saturday, January 09, 2016, 04:27 (3244 days ago) @ Funkmon
I'm sorry. I know that Star Wars takes place in a fictional fantasy universe where the laws of physics don't apply. But the visuals of the film do not support an FTL laser or beam weapon.
Here's the thing: if you observed an FTL laser going by, you wouldn't see it traveling from the gun to the destination. You would observe the laser spearing out in two directions from the point nearest to you. One would travel to the gun, the other would travel to the target, because the light from the nearest point of the laser/beam's (I'm simplifying here.) would reach you before the light from anywhere else on the laser's path.
Doesn't really matter, but the whole sequence in the film would have been better if it was a huge cannon that fired through hyperspace, like the Galaxy Gun.
Ah well. Enjoyed the movie tremendously on the second watch. Went to a theater where the sound equipment worked perfectly, and went with my family instead of a bunch of friends who either didn't show up or MST'd the movie.
The Hell it can.
by Funkmon , Saturday, January 09, 2016, 04:34 (3244 days ago) @ Quirel
And the black hole in interstellar doesn't look like a black hole would either. We can't say it isn't a black hole because it doesn't look lopsided. There's also no sound in space. Are we to assume that because we can hear the ships and stuff in Star Wars it isn't space? No. Unfortunately, despite the visuals being wrong, they said it's FTL. It's FTL.
On Star Wars and JJ Abrams... *no spoilers*
by tadboz, Fort Collins, CO, Thursday, December 31, 2015, 21:37 (3253 days ago) @ Avateur
It's explained briefly, though I get how its mobility is a little hard to believe.
But, by the same token... the original Death Star had a hyperdrive. It HAD to, to get from the Alderaan system to the Yavin system. It's just never shown. That something that big could go FTL defies common sense for most people, I imagine--hence why neither IV nor VII dwell on it on-screen.
Rian Johnson!
by cheapLEY , Friday, December 25, 2015, 14:14 (3259 days ago) @ Avateur
I'm really excited for Episode VIII with Rian Johnson at the helm. The Brothers Bloom is one of my favorite movies in terms of tone, humor, and dialogue. Is it too much to hope for a Bloom-esque buddy movie with Poe and Finn?!
Rian Johnson!
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Saturday, December 26, 2015, 17:42 (3258 days ago) @ cheapLEY
I'm really excited for Episode VIII with Rian Johnson at the helm. The Brothers Bloom is one of my favorite movies in terms of tone, humor, and dialogue. Is it too much to hope for a Bloom-esque buddy movie with Poe and Finn?!
Me too, and Brick and Looper are great as well!
Watched movie. Meh.
by ProbablyLast, Friday, December 25, 2015, 21:18 (3259 days ago) @ Avateur
- No text -
Just saw Star Wars a 2nd time - no spoilers
by CruelLEGACEY , Toronto, Thursday, December 31, 2015, 14:05 (3253 days ago) @ Avateur
I had some mixed feelings after watching the movie for the first time. Enjoyed it overall, but all the reused plot points and the hyper pacing dragged it down for me a bit.
2nd time through, I absolutely loved it. My thoughts on the plot and pacing still stand, but I was able to look past them more easily and focus on the characters more. To me, that is where this movie really shines, specifically Rey and Kylo Ren. I think Daisy Ridley and Adam Driver are both phenomenal in this movie. Easily my 2 favorite Star Wars characters. I'm seriously bummed that I need to wait so long to see their story continue. I guess I'll have to settle with re-watching The Force Awakens a bajillion times to hold me over :)
Just saw Star Wars a 2nd time - no spoilers
by TheeChaos , Thursday, December 31, 2015, 14:08 (3253 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
I just watched it the second time Tuesday, i agree. Definitely better than the first for me. the first time I saw Adam Driver, it was really offsetting (after mask removal) but the second time it seemed alot more natural. I totally see what they were going for and he totally hit it spot on.
I will probably go see it a third time, probably in Imax 3D for the first time (I hate 3D).
New favorite character, BB-8. Poe as a second.
Just saw Star Wars a 2nd time - no spoilers
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Thursday, December 31, 2015, 15:41 (3253 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
I'm seriously bummed that I need to wait so long to see their story continue. I guess I'll have to settle with re-watching The Force Awakens a bajillion times to hold me over :)
Hey at least it's only a year and a half! Plus we get Rogue One next year!
I liked it better the second time, too.
by Kermit , Raleigh, NC, Friday, January 01, 2016, 22:57 (3252 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
- No text -
I didn't
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Saturday, January 02, 2016, 01:11 (3252 days ago) @ Kermit
Dunno what it was, but my second viewing felt insanely more rushed than my first. I guess I was savoring the hell out of every scene on my first viewing, as opposed to expecting my favorites on the second.
Still one hell of a movie, though.
Me either.
by Funkmon , Saturday, January 02, 2016, 03:35 (3251 days ago) @ ZackDark
As the only nerd most of the people I know know, I've been invited to see this movie three times.
To me, it gets worse and worse.
Some of the things I found jarring the first time cinematically, like lighting and camera work I consider out of place in Star Wars have become less noticeable to me, which is good, but the more I watched it, the more samey and contrived it gets. All I can see upon repeated viewings is someone checking off a list of things the fans are perceived to have wanted. It seems meticulously crafted to make Star Wars fans like it, not for any inherent qualities of its own, but simply rehashing old stuff the creator knows they like.
As I expected, at least to me, this movie does not stand up to repeated viewings. All I see is a cash in opportunity. I hope the next one is more original.
I disagree
by Avateur , Saturday, January 02, 2016, 03:50 (3251 days ago) @ Funkmon
All the same, this is probably my favorite critical review of the movie that I bet you'll agree with. Hell, I can hardly disagree with the majority of it. Either way, my second viewing of the movie was definitely as enjoyable if not moreso than my first, incredibly valid criticisms and all. Something about this movie just works in ways that other reboots/remakes/sequels/prequels don't (probably the fact that Abrams is so great at ripping off things that came before that worked well).
I disagree
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Saturday, January 02, 2016, 04:20 (3251 days ago) @ Avateur
That review was... Well, I just feel bad for whoever wrote it. He seems so caught up in the obvious, that movies are made to make money, that he's become blind to having fun. For instance, he says:
You, the consumer, are the mark who keeps paying.
To which I say: Damn right I'll keep paying as long as what is being produced is entertaining. Not every moving is going to be deep and intellectual. Not every movie is going to redefine how we think of cinema. Most aren't and won't, but that's perfectly ok because that's not the point of movies.
Heh, I kinda want to see a list of films this guy did like... if there are any...
I agree. Also a completely inapplicable Bob Seger metaphor.
by Funkmon , Saturday, January 02, 2016, 05:29 (3251 days ago) @ Ragashingo
This guy hates fun. I agree with all his points, but I maintain that this movie is a good movie. The reviewer is doing the very thing he claims others are doing to their detriment, and can't separate the massive box office success from the movie itself. He's wrong about it being a bad movie just because it was the same stuff.
When Bob Seger released his second live album, Nine Tonight, I don't think people thought it was a bad album because it had a lot of his hits virtually unchanged from the studio recordings. In fact, people thought it was great. Bob live is fantastic. However, on the radio, what versions of Night Moves, Hollywood Nights, and Old Time Rock & Roll do you hear? That's right, the studio versions. The original. But if you only have one album, Nine Tonight is a great one to have.
When you look at Live Bullet, his first record, and see how Bob took the studio versions of his old songs and changed Travelin' Man and Beautiful Loser, good songs, to be one of the single greatest pieces of rock and roll ever created, you realize the creativity was gone in Nine Tonight. Live Bullet has a Bob Seger young and desperate for international attention who's been languishing in obscurity (outside of Michigan, where he had been popular for 10 years) reworking his songs to rock as hard as anything coming out of the 1970s. In doing so, he created a masterpiece. When you hear Turn The Page, Travelin' Man, Beautiful Loser, Katmandu, Ramblin' Gamblin' Man or his cover of Nutbush City Limits on the radio, it's the Live Bullet versions. These are wonderful, creative reworkings of his originals.
In Star Wars, I want to see less Nine Tonight, still a good album, and more Live Bullet, a top album of all time.
I disagree
by Korny , Dalton, Ga. US. Earth, Sol System, Saturday, January 02, 2016, 05:39 (3251 days ago) @ Ragashingo
That review was... Well, I just feel bad for whoever wrote it. He seems so caught up in the obvious, that movies are made to make money, that he's become blind to having fun. For instance, he says:
You, the consumer, are the mark who keeps paying.
To which I say: Damn right I'll keep paying as long as what is being produced is entertaining. Not every moving is going to be deep and intellectual. Not every movie is going to redefine how we think of cinema. Most aren't and won't, but that's perfectly ok because that's not the point of movies.
Yeah, the dude clearly went into it without wanting to have fun. He went in looking to "solve a mystery" that would justify his negative view of Disney and franchising. He goes on and on about Hollywood and the success of Disney's acquisition long before he even gets to the movie, and he never distinguishes the film from the franchise and merchandise.
Heh, I kinda want to see a list of films this guy did like... if there are any...
The pretentious tone and scornful views on those who dare enjoy this film makes me think that he's one of those morons who likes something like "Drawing Restraint 9" or "My Dinner With Andre". I wouldn't put too much stock into his views and nitpicks.
Just saw Star Wars a 2nd time - no spoilers
by Avateur , Saturday, January 02, 2016, 00:19 (3252 days ago) @ CruelLEGACEY
Have you seen the stuff that's come out regarding the script? It's made some things clearer, answered some questions, and has me even more excited for what's to come.
Just saw Star Wars a 2nd time - no spoilers
by Quirel, Saturday, January 02, 2016, 04:57 (3251 days ago) @ Avateur
Have you seen the stuff that's come out regarding the script? It's made some things clearer, answered some questions, and has me even more excited for what's to come.
No, I haven't. Links?
Just saw Star Wars a 2nd time - no spoilers
by Avateur , Sunday, January 03, 2016, 00:07 (3251 days ago) @ Quirel
edited by Avateur, Sunday, January 03, 2016, 00:27
Here you go! DEFINITELY spoilers:
http://www.slashfilm.com/star-wars-the-force-awakens-ending/
Yep, definitely going for a new viewing now
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Sunday, January 03, 2016, 06:42 (3250 days ago) @ Avateur
Thanks, Avateur. Great read.
Saw it a second time. A few observations:
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Sunday, January 10, 2016, 23:33 (3243 days ago) @ Avateur
1. I did not notice the first time that Rey and Fin discovered Luke's floating light saber training droid during the scene they have to repair the Falcon. It gets held up just for an instant, but it made me laugh.
2. The Starkiller not only destroyed the New Republic government. It also destroyed the Senate (spoken in dialogue) and the New Republic's "precious fleet" (spoken in Dialogue and shown exploding in orbit of the main Republic planet... something I hadn't noticed before.) This would be why the good guys could only field a flight of X-Wings vs the Starkiller.
3. Of all the people gathered in the Resistance's war room, I couldn't help but notice a young girl standing just behind Leia with vaguely the same hair style as her. She was never really focused on but it seemed a bit odd and interesting to me. Do we know anything about her at all?
4. The star system the New Republic was in was never named. Only the system the Resistance base was in was named.
5. Fin and Han look up into the sky of Maz's planet and sees the Republic planets getting destroyed. Not just the beam that destroyed crossing the galaxy. But the actual planets being hit. So... Han Solo took them to Maz's bar in the same system that the New Republic existed in then to the Resistance base in a different system? Does that mean the Starkiller was parked around the New Republic's star as well? Did it later move to the star system housing the Resistance? Is that why the X-Wings could stop it before its 15 minute charging sequence finished?
Saw it a second time. A few observations:
by Xenos , Shores of Time, Sunday, January 10, 2016, 23:53 (3243 days ago) @ Ragashingo
3. Of all the people gathered in the Resistance's war room, I couldn't help but notice a young girl standing just behind Leia with vaguely the same hair style as her. She was never really focused on but it seemed a bit odd and interesting to me. Do we know anything about her at all?
Yeah I read about that before the movie came out: http://www.people.com/article/billie-lourd-star-wars-force-awakens-carrie-fisher-princess-leia
It's Carrie Fisher's daughter, but the hairstyle seems to just be an homage, she's Commander Connix or something like that in the credits.
Ah. Thanks. :)
by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Monday, January 11, 2016, 02:11 (3243 days ago) @ Xenos
- No text -
Saw it a second time. A few observations:
by ZackDark , Not behind you. NO! Don't look., Monday, January 11, 2016, 02:34 (3243 days ago) @ Ragashingo
4. The star system the New Republic was in was never named. Only the system the Resistance base was in was named.
Actually, Poe directly mentions it as Hosnian system when he introduces Finn to Leia. The name is further confirmed in both the EU and the novelization of the movie.
5. Fin and Han look up into the sky of Maz's planet and sees the Republic planets getting destroyed. Not just the beam that destroyed crossing the galaxy. But the actual planets being hit. So... Han Solo took them to Maz's bar in the same system that the New Republic existed in then to the Resistance base in a different system? Does that mean the Starkiller was parked around the New Republic's star as well? Did it later move to the star system housing the Resistance? Is that why the X-Wings could stop it before its 15 minute charging sequence finished?
Well, seeing the planets explode makes very little sense, but the beam was supposed to be FTL, so theoretically, Starkiller isn't necessarily anywhere near any of its targets. The proximity to a star might be a different matter, though. About the 15 minutes window, though, I think I need another viewing to try and come up with an excuse for it. :p