Why not use a newer forum style.
by uberfoop 
, Seattle-ish, Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 20:51 (4109 days ago) @ asklon
Threads can branch naturally without people trying to get words in edgewise across multiple lines of discussion shoved into a single chain.
I've seen forums that use a "newer style" but want bungie.org-like levels of branchability, and they wind up with these weird discussions about whether it's appropriate to push certain groups of posts to certain new threads and places. It works, but it's a bit of a mess and takes more mod effort. Better to just cut out the middleman and use this format.
Complete thread:
- Why not use a newer forum style. -
asklon,
2013-02-12, 20:28
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Why not use a newer forum style. -
katancik,
2013-02-12, 20:30
- Why not use a newer forum style. -
Ragashingo,
2013-02-12, 20:33
- Why not use a newer forum style. - bluerunner, 2013-02-12, 20:41
- Why not use a newer forum style. -
Ragashingo,
2013-02-12, 20:33
- Why not use a newer forum style. - JDQuackers, 2013-02-12, 20:39
- Why not use a newer forum style. - JDQuackers, 2013-02-12, 20:45
- Why not use a newer forum style. -
uberfoop,
2013-02-12, 20:51
- Why not use a newer forum style. - Ragashingo, 2013-02-12, 20:59
- Thank God we're not. -
Kermit,
2013-02-13, 04:27
- Thank God we're not. -
Revenant1988,
2013-02-13, 06:14
- Thank God we're not. -
bluerunner,
2013-02-13, 07:09
- Thank God we're not. -
Revenant1988,
2013-02-13, 07:37
- Thank God we're not. -
NsU Soldier,
2013-02-13, 09:40
- Thank God we're not. -
SonofMacPhisto,
2013-02-13, 16:27
- Thank God we're not. -
bluerunner,
2013-02-13, 18:17
- Thank God we're not. - NsU Soldier, 2013-02-13, 19:49
- Thank God we're not. -
bluerunner,
2013-02-13, 18:17
- Thank God we're not. -
SonofMacPhisto,
2013-02-13, 16:27
- Thank God we're not. -
NsU Soldier,
2013-02-13, 09:40
- Thank God we're not. - thebruce, 2013-02-14, 06:52
- Thank God we're not. -
Revenant1988,
2013-02-13, 07:37
- Thank God we're not. -
bluerunner,
2013-02-13, 07:09
- Thank God we're not. -
Revenant1988,
2013-02-13, 06:14
- Think of the NMs! Think of the NMs! *NM* -
ZackDark,
2013-02-13, 14:04
- no need. empty msg: no preview speech bubble. look left -> -
scarab,
2013-02-13, 15:20
- well there wasn't until I edited my post - scarab, 2013-02-13, 15:24
- Hmmm... -
ZackDark,
2013-02-13, 19:43
- You want advice from someone who is demented? - scarab, 2013-02-13, 23:16
- no need. empty msg: no preview speech bubble. look left -> - thebruce, 2013-02-14, 06:54
- no need. empty msg: no preview speech bubble. look left -> -
scarab,
2013-02-13, 15:20
- Why not use a newer forum style. -
thebruce,
2013-02-14, 10:51
- Ooh, you're a CSS ninja? -
Arithmomaniac,
2013-02-14, 12:21
- Ooh, you're a CSS ninja? - thebruce, 2013-02-15, 06:28
- Ooh, you're a CSS ninja? -
Arithmomaniac,
2013-02-14, 12:21
- Touch/Mobile devices? -
GeekInABox,
2013-02-14, 12:30
- Touch/Mobile devices? -
bluerunner,
2013-02-14, 13:00
- Touch/Mobile devices? -
stabbim,
2013-02-14, 14:14
- Chrome for Android: here to save the day! -
JDQuackers,
2013-02-15, 09:43
- Chrome for Android: here to save the day! -
stabbim,
2013-02-15, 10:03
- Chrome for Android: here to save the day! -
JDQuackers,
2013-02-15, 11:09
- Chrome for Android: here to save the day! -
bluerunner,
2013-02-15, 11:30
- Chrome for Android: here to save the day! - JDQuackers, 2013-02-15, 12:56
- Chrome for Android: here to save the day! -
bluerunner,
2013-02-15, 11:30
- Chrome for Android: here to save the day! -
JDQuackers,
2013-02-15, 11:09
- Chrome for iOS - Xenos, 2013-02-15, 12:53
- Chrome for Android: here to save the day! -
stabbim,
2013-02-15, 10:03
- Chrome for Android: here to save the day! -
JDQuackers,
2013-02-15, 09:43
- Touch/Mobile devices? -
stabbim,
2013-02-14, 14:14
- Touch/Mobile devices? - kapowaz, 2013-02-15, 06:39
- Touch/Mobile devices? -
bluerunner,
2013-02-14, 13:00
- Why not use a newer forum style. - kittens, 2013-02-16, 00:55
- Why not use a newer forum style. -
katancik,
2013-02-12, 20:30