Semantics (Destiny)

by someotherguy, Hertfordshire, England, Tuesday, July 07, 2015, 18:27 (3663 days ago) @ Cody Miller
edited by someotherguy, Tuesday, July 07, 2015, 18:31

Obviously Destiny is still competitive. No one is saying can't compete without those things. That Destiny is somehow inherently uncompetitive and this is more so. You can compete in anything for anything. But we both know that that's not what these people are talking about.

You can argue about what "competitive" is, but these folks are asking for a specific form of competition, and arguing semantics over the choice of wording doesn't make that specific thing any less the thing they want. I can tell you all about how I think tennis would be more "competitive" with a more or less strict ruleset, and I might or might not be right, but people who want to play traditional tennis would still want to play traditional tennis a vice versa.

EDIT: I do think it's silly to say this more "competitive" mode is inherently better though too. I like Destiny as it is, but I'd also like to try this new form too. They both sound like fun to me, and they obviously both serve different purposes.

Something something Sith something absolutes.