Speaking for itself (Gaming)
There has been a lot of talk recently about the decay of method acting in Hollywood. It is now about ego, about visibly showing the dedication to acting, and such displays garner awards. But I think it extends to the audience too. Does knowing Leo went through hellish conditions color your view of his performance?
Let me ask you this. Imagine that you know nothing about No Man's Sky. You are completely unaware of the procedural generation. You have no clue there are 16 quintillion planets. You have no idea it was made by 4 people. All you know about the game is what's presented as you play… as far as you are concerned this planet you start on was created like any other space in video games.
Would you still be impressed?
I would be fucking FLOORED. Seriously, you can just point yourself in a direction and walk. For hours. And there will constantly be new things popping up all around you to explore. Designing a single world of that size in the traditional way would have taken someone years upon years to complete. And then you go into space and there aren't just more worlds in your system to visit, but billions of other systems!?!! Holy fuck. Ho-leee fuuuuuuck.
This game is a watershed moment in video game design. It's a landmark. A triumph. An incredible achievement.
And - contrary to the very loud hype monsters - it's really, really fun.
Complete thread:
- Speaking for itself -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 02:14
- Who is this Leo? -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-13, 03:04
- Bingo. - cheapLEY, 2016-08-13, 03:18
- Of course not. -
Funkmon,
2016-08-13, 04:44
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 11:06
- Of course not. -
Korny,
2016-08-13, 11:25
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 11:27
- Of course not. - Korny, 2016-08-13, 11:55
- Hmm. - slycrel, 2016-08-13, 13:20
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 11:27
- Of course not. -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-13, 13:19
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 13:58
- Of course not. - Ragashingo, 2016-08-13, 15:47
- Of course not. -
Claude Errera,
2016-08-13, 17:54
- Of course not. - Cody Miller, 2016-08-13, 18:28
- Of course not. -
Robot Chickens,
2016-08-13, 20:10
- ^Definitely the best post in this thread^ -
stabbim,
2016-08-15, 04:18
- Whoa, whoa, whoa. -
Funkmon,
2016-08-15, 04:26
- +2 - Robot Chickens, 2016-08-15, 13:59
- Whoa, whoa, whoa. -
Funkmon,
2016-08-15, 04:26
- ^Definitely the best post in this thread^ -
stabbim,
2016-08-15, 04:18
- Of course not. - EffortlessFury, 2016-08-13, 22:23
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 13:58
- Of course not. -
Korny,
2016-08-13, 11:25
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 11:06
- Speaking for itself - Chewbaccawakka, 2016-08-13, 05:45
- Problems with perception -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-08-13, 14:20
- Problems with perception - Cody Miller, 2016-08-13, 14:28
- At the end of the day, who cares? -
cheapLEY,
2016-08-13, 16:11
- +1 - Korny, 2016-08-13, 17:37
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
electricpirate,
2016-08-14, 02:11
- I've been waiting for this day...for a looooong time... -
Pyromancy,
2016-08-14, 03:10
- Well played, sir. Well played indeed. :) - Ragashingo, 2016-08-14, 03:22
- I've been waiting for this day...for a looooong time... - stabbim, 2016-08-15, 04:16
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
stabbim,
2016-08-15, 04:17
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
electricpirate,
2016-08-16, 02:33
- No art speaks entirely for itself - INSANEdrive, 2016-08-17, 03:07
- No art speaks entirely for itself - stabbim, 2016-08-17, 17:33
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
electricpirate,
2016-08-16, 02:33
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-16, 12:46
- No art speaks entirely for itself - Kermit, 2016-08-16, 15:16
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
electricpirate,
2016-08-16, 16:26
- He did say "enjoy" :p - ZackDark, 2016-08-16, 16:28
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-16, 23:09
- Wait... -
ZackDark,
2016-08-17, 01:58
- Woah man, thats like so deep, its like a metaphor for people - Pyromancy, 2016-08-17, 02:24
- Wait... -
ZackDark,
2016-08-17, 01:58
- I've been waiting for this day...for a looooong time... -
Pyromancy,
2016-08-14, 03:10
- Speaking for itself -
Kermit,
2016-08-15, 15:10
- Speaking for itself -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-15, 15:22
- Speaking for itself -
Kermit,
2016-08-15, 15:35
- +1 -
Claude Errera,
2016-08-15, 16:23
- +2. I don't even read the usernames anymore. -
ProbablyLast,
2016-08-15, 16:33
- The opposite is also fun... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-08-15, 21:33
- The opposite is also fun... - Kermit, 2016-08-15, 21:58
- The opposite is also fun... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-08-15, 21:33
- Makes me wonder, who does and doesn't have a voice -
kidtsunami,
2016-08-15, 19:41
- Morpheus Caps Every. Single. Word. -
marmot 1333,
2016-08-15, 20:05
- Wow, I've never noticed till now, so consistent. - kidtsunami, 2016-08-15, 20:26
- Holy crap. -
Funkmon,
2016-08-15, 21:45
- +1 - ZackDark, 2016-08-15, 22:22
- Holy crap. - CyberKN, 2016-08-15, 22:34
- Morpheus Caps Every. Single. Word. -
marmot 1333,
2016-08-15, 20:05
- +1 -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-15, 21:14
- +1 - Kermit, 2016-08-15, 21:19
- Everyone starts using Gizoogle :P - CyberKN, 2016-08-15, 21:27
- +2. I don't even read the usernames anymore. -
ProbablyLast,
2016-08-15, 16:33
- +1 -
Claude Errera,
2016-08-15, 16:23
- Speaking for itself -
Kermit,
2016-08-15, 15:35
- Of interest - Kermit, 2016-08-15, 17:52
- Speaking for itself -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-15, 15:22
- Speaking for itself - Kahzgul, 2016-08-17, 23:19
- Who is this Leo? -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-13, 03:04