Avatar

Destiny Fan Art: How is this legal? (Off-Topic)

by Leviathan ⌂, Hotel Zanzibar, Tuesday, August 05, 2014, 12:34 (3553 days ago) @ Mariachi

In general, most big companies don't try to oppress small-scale fan creations, especially when it isn't using their direct art, though technically, some might be found in court to be infringing. Art/Copyright/Freedom of Speech laws are largely up for interpretation and by a case-by-case basis with a myriad of conflicting precedents. (Though if you're a giant corporation with expensive lawyers, you'll probably win.)

There's plenty of examples in that link you posted of just the straight logo thrown on a shirt, and that's pretty easy to show it's infringing as there was no re-interpretation or alteration. But the vague area begins once you start truly altering or creating your own work/variations with an IP. Where do you draw the line between infringing and freedom of speech? What part of the creation is a reference to something that exists and what percentage is your perspective/expression on it? For example, an anti-corporate painting in a gallery uses the character Ronald MacDonald. Is that illegal if you sell it? Or is that using a common icon in society and culture and expressing a view on it?

More questions: If you create a character named Darkwing that's a duck dressed up like Batman, is it parody or allegory? Is that your own idea or are you actually stealing the idea of Batman? Wasn't Batman a variation of the Shadow and Zorro? On another note, if a shirt jokes about Game of Thrones, is that infringing on that book/show's rights? What about if someone personally commissions me to draw their Guardian - are they paying for the Destiny IP or are they paying for my service?

In many cases, some of these small-scale fan art/creations work in the company's favor. It's marketing and allowing a culture to grow around your IP. It's only when it starts to compete with something the IP is intended to make money off of that you see it shut down. Some contracts with IP-owners also allow for small-run prints and materials using their copyrights. Marvel/DC actually relies on commissions and prints from artists using their characters in a way, as it leads them to find new and popular talent all the time.

So the answer is: It's not. But sometimes it is. And it's all really confusing. But usually it's ultimately up to the IP-owner's discretion and their ability to enforce that discretion.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread