data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fb24/3fb2431fb62ea51c17f5b866c83aa69f8c653908" alt="Avatar"
We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x (Destiny)
Agreed. And I think the way Bungie has talked about TTK in official circles (interviews, on show floors, ect) where they refer to it as "Destiny: The Taken King" as if it is a new product rather than talking about TTK as DLC speaks to the idea that there may never be a Destiny sequel. Look too at the way Destiny's back end has received steady improvement. No one thing is major, but stuff like changing the aiming / shooting system to have make more use of the Range stat so as to give Auto Rifles a place again, or the multiple not-insignificant tweaks to the matchmaking systems and Quest display systems and UI over the last year and a half...
Maybe there will be a sequel and maybe there won't, but one thing is clear: Bungie has not developed Destiny like they did Halo. The amount of new front end content and back end fixes that have come out for Destiny dwarf any Halo release.
Complete thread:
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? -
Schedonnardus,
2016-01-22, 14:37
- Think it began from this image - unoudid, 2016-01-22, 14:42
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? -
electricpirate,
2016-01-22, 14:44
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? -
Schedonnardus,
2016-01-22, 14:49
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? - Kahzgul, 2016-01-22, 15:07
- ^This - CyberKN, 2016-01-22, 14:50
- In the contract. Here's some other stuff. -
narcogen,
2016-01-23, 05:16
- In the contract. Here's some other stuff. - stabbim, 2016-01-23, 06:37
- great post narc, thanks!
- Schedonnardus, 2016-01-25, 14:19
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? -
Schedonnardus,
2016-01-22, 14:49
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
dogcow,
2016-01-22, 14:54
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
stabbim,
2016-01-22, 15:13
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
Blackt1g3r,
2016-01-22, 15:20
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
Ragashingo,
2016-01-22, 16:39
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - MacGyver10, 2016-01-22, 17:51
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - stabbim, 2016-01-22, 17:37
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
Ragashingo,
2016-01-22, 16:39
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - Xenos, 2016-01-22, 15:35
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - dogcow, 2016-01-22, 18:44
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
narcogen,
2016-01-23, 04:44
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - stabbim, 2016-01-23, 06:39
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
Blackt1g3r,
2016-01-22, 15:20
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
stabbim,
2016-01-22, 15:13
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
Avateur,
2016-01-22, 16:50
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 18:12
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
Claude Errera,
2016-01-22, 18:17
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" - marmot 1333, 2016-01-22, 18:39
- Thanks. -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 18:44
- Thanks. - marmot 1333, 2016-01-22, 18:50
- Thanks. - Blackt1g3r, 2016-01-22, 18:51
- Thanks. - dogcow, 2016-01-22, 19:03
- TTK was destiny 2. Settled for me for some time now.
- slycrel, 2016-01-22, 19:55
- TTK was an actual expansion -
Avateur,
2016-01-22, 22:14
- Agreed. -
Ragashingo,
2016-01-22, 22:24
- Agreed. - slycrel, 2016-01-23, 04:51
- TTK was Comet #1.
- narcogen, 2016-01-23, 05:20
- Agreed. -
Ragashingo,
2016-01-22, 22:24
- TTK was an actual expansion -
Avateur,
2016-01-22, 22:14
- Thanks. -
Avateur,
2016-01-22, 22:10
- Thanks. -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 22:45
- Thanks. - Ragashingo, 2016-01-22, 23:10
- Not odd at all. Revised schedule speculation. - narcogen, 2016-01-23, 05:32
- Thanks. -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-01-23, 16:03
- Thanks. -
Xenos,
2016-01-23, 16:41
- Thanks. -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-01-24, 00:43
- Big companies are not known for transparent communication - Mid7night, 2016-01-25, 02:12
- Thanks. -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-01-24, 00:43
- Thanks. -
Xenos,
2016-01-23, 16:41
- Thanks. -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 22:45
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
Claude Errera,
2016-01-22, 18:17
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 18:12
- Hope for a better game. -
ProbablyLast,
2016-01-22, 18:55
- Hope for... the future? -
Beorn,
2016-01-22, 23:21
- #tosoon
- breitzen, 2016-01-23, 01:34
- #+1
- red robber, 2016-01-23, 02:18
- #itwillalwaysbetoosoon
- Beorn, 2016-01-23, 02:42
- +1
- breitzen, 2016-01-23, 03:18
- +1
- #itwillalwaysbetoosoon
- #+1
- #tosoon
- Hope for... the future? -
Beorn,
2016-01-22, 23:21