data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50c37/50c3762d9a1feaa3e38e655e2e304a641a1b1fde" alt="Avatar"
We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x (Destiny)
Right, but I don't think you can necessarily equate a 2.0 version number with a sequel. Destiny version 2.1 or whatever is the 2.1 version of that specific codebase. It represents certain updates and revisions, to the first release of Destiny. If the sequel we'll refer to for now as "Destiny 2" comes out and is an actual new game with new code, the version of "Destiny 2" that ships on release day should be version 1.0*, of that particular software.
Why would they ever do that at this point.
Do you want a new game that starts over from scratch the way vanilla Destiny game would? Or would you want to keep access to all current content, but continue to get new stuff?
Complete thread:
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? -
Schedonnardus,
2016-01-22, 14:37
- Think it began from this image - unoudid, 2016-01-22, 14:42
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? -
electricpirate,
2016-01-22, 14:44
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? -
Schedonnardus,
2016-01-22, 14:49
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? - Kahzgul, 2016-01-22, 15:07
- ^This - CyberKN, 2016-01-22, 14:50
- In the contract. Here's some other stuff. -
narcogen,
2016-01-23, 05:16
- In the contract. Here's some other stuff. - stabbim, 2016-01-23, 06:37
- great post narc, thanks!
- Schedonnardus, 2016-01-25, 14:19
- Where did the assumption of Destiny 2 2016 originate? -
Schedonnardus,
2016-01-22, 14:49
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
dogcow,
2016-01-22, 14:54
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
stabbim,
2016-01-22, 15:13
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
Blackt1g3r,
2016-01-22, 15:20
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
Ragashingo,
2016-01-22, 16:39
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - MacGyver10, 2016-01-22, 17:51
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - stabbim, 2016-01-22, 17:37
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
Ragashingo,
2016-01-22, 16:39
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - Xenos, 2016-01-22, 15:35
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - dogcow, 2016-01-22, 18:44
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
narcogen,
2016-01-23, 04:44
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x - stabbim, 2016-01-23, 06:39
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
Blackt1g3r,
2016-01-22, 15:20
- We already HAVE Destiny v2.0.x -
stabbim,
2016-01-22, 15:13
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
Avateur,
2016-01-22, 16:50
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 18:12
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
Claude Errera,
2016-01-22, 18:17
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" - marmot 1333, 2016-01-22, 18:39
- Thanks. -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 18:44
- Thanks. - marmot 1333, 2016-01-22, 18:50
- Thanks. - Blackt1g3r, 2016-01-22, 18:51
- Thanks. - dogcow, 2016-01-22, 19:03
- TTK was destiny 2. Settled for me for some time now.
- slycrel, 2016-01-22, 19:55
- TTK was an actual expansion -
Avateur,
2016-01-22, 22:14
- Agreed. -
Ragashingo,
2016-01-22, 22:24
- Agreed. - slycrel, 2016-01-23, 04:51
- TTK was Comet #1.
- narcogen, 2016-01-23, 05:20
- Agreed. -
Ragashingo,
2016-01-22, 22:24
- TTK was an actual expansion -
Avateur,
2016-01-22, 22:14
- Thanks. -
Avateur,
2016-01-22, 22:10
- Thanks. -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 22:45
- Thanks. - Ragashingo, 2016-01-22, 23:10
- Not odd at all. Revised schedule speculation. - narcogen, 2016-01-23, 05:32
- Thanks. -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-01-23, 16:03
- Thanks. -
Xenos,
2016-01-23, 16:41
- Thanks. -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-01-24, 00:43
- Big companies are not known for transparent communication - Mid7night, 2016-01-25, 02:12
- Thanks. -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-01-24, 00:43
- Thanks. -
Xenos,
2016-01-23, 16:41
- Thanks. -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 22:45
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
Claude Errera,
2016-01-22, 18:17
- "The Great Destiny Malaise" -
cheapLEY,
2016-01-22, 18:12
- Hope for a better game. -
ProbablyLast,
2016-01-22, 18:55
- Hope for... the future? -
Beorn,
2016-01-22, 23:21
- #tosoon
- breitzen, 2016-01-23, 01:34
- #+1
- red robber, 2016-01-23, 02:18
- #itwillalwaysbetoosoon
- Beorn, 2016-01-23, 02:42
- +1
- breitzen, 2016-01-23, 03:18
- +1
- #itwillalwaysbetoosoon
- #+1
- #tosoon
- Hope for... the future? -
Beorn,
2016-01-22, 23:21