So does wikipedia, apparently, as well as my J-school profs. (Gaming)
Investigative reporting?Come on.
I'll call it that the first time a game reviewer files a FOIA request.
So, only governmental reporting qualifies as investigative journalism? Why?
Also, why is limiting the scope of your investigation to only entities who are most easily compelled to cooperate with your investigation above the qualifying bar?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigative_journalism
"Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing."
I'd probably be willing to expand a definition a bit beyond that, but not much beyond.
At the very least, I'd consider public interest to be a prerequisite-- not the broad definition meaning "things the public express interest in" but the narrow definition, in terms of "things the public has a right to know" because it affects them.
Consumer fraud, labor disputes, debates about violence and sexism, these things might potentially apply.
Whether or not a game deserved a 7/10 doesn't.
Rushing to get the "scoop" on a 7 week delay for a game that's been in development for years so that you get the clicks instead of somebody else... that's not investigative journalism even if you use the procedures of that form to get your information.
Complete thread:
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
cheapLEY,
2016-06-01, 01:39
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Speedracer513,
2016-06-01, 01:59
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-01, 04:32
- You know it's bad when this guy ^ gets offended -
Robot Chickens,
2016-06-01, 05:24
- They treat people like they're dumb sometimes. :( - Funkmon, 2016-06-01, 08:33
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-01, 05:32
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Kahzgul,
2016-06-01, 14:45
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-01, 15:20
- I'm confused by Codytaku -
someotherguy,
2016-06-01, 15:31
- I'm confused by Codytaku -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-06-02, 00:56
- TIL . . . -
cheapLEY,
2016-06-02, 01:09
- Using dictionaries doesn't help in cases like these. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-02, 08:39
- Possibly my favourite sentence ever. - someotherguy, 2016-06-02, 11:43
- Using dictionaries doesn't help in cases like these. -
cheapLEY,
2016-06-02, 17:16
- Using dictionaries doesn't help in cases like these. - CruelLEGACEY, 2016-06-02, 17:25
- Using dictionaries doesn't help in cases like these. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-02, 17:55
- We still exist. -
Vortech,
2016-06-02, 19:26
- That's simply not possible to do with dictionaries. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-03, 00:10
- TIL. -
cheapLEY,
2016-06-03, 01:06
- +1 -
ZackDark,
2016-06-03, 01:15
- Images and video (!) of commentary from the OED. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-03, 03:53
- You and I have very different definitions of "manageable" -
ZackDark,
2016-06-03, 03:54
- At minimum size, the entry is still too large to capture. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-03, 04:03
- At minimum size, the entry is still too large to capture. -
Vortech,
2016-06-03, 16:21
- No. The entry is 211k characters. ~70 pages long. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-03, 18:43
- Well, for a first read, yeah - ZackDark, 2016-06-03, 19:55
- No. The entry is 211k characters. ~70 pages long. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-03, 18:43
- At minimum size, the entry is still too large to capture. -
Vortech,
2016-06-03, 16:21
- At minimum size, the entry is still too large to capture. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-03, 04:03
- You and I have very different definitions of "manageable" -
ZackDark,
2016-06-03, 03:54
- Images and video (!) of commentary from the OED. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-03, 03:53
- +1 -
ZackDark,
2016-06-03, 01:15
- Tl:dr? -
ProbablyLast,
2016-06-03, 02:12
- Tl:dr: it hasn't for 250 years. - Funkmon, 2016-06-03, 04:19
- Sort of random tangent . . . -
cheapLEY,
2016-06-03, 02:47
- Sort of random tangent . . . - ZackDark, 2016-06-03, 02:55
- When it's used as its own word often it gets an entry *IMG*. - Funkmon, 2016-06-03, 03:25
- That's simply not possible to do with dictionaries. -
Vortech,
2016-06-03, 16:27
- That's simply not possible to do with dictionaries. -
Robot Chickens,
2016-06-03, 16:57
- +1 for the Funkmon continuum - ZackDark, 2016-06-03, 18:26
- You probably made his week. - ProbablyLast, 2016-06-03, 17:54
- I didn't spend much time on it. - Funkmon, 2016-06-03, 18:55
- That's simply not possible to do with dictionaries. -
Robot Chickens,
2016-06-03, 16:57
- TIL. -
cheapLEY,
2016-06-03, 01:06
- That's simply not possible to do with dictionaries. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-03, 00:10
- We still exist. -
Vortech,
2016-06-02, 19:26
- TIL . . . - SonofMacPhisto, 2016-06-03, 14:40
- Using dictionaries doesn't help in cases like these. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-02, 08:39
- TIL . . . -
cheapLEY,
2016-06-02, 01:09
- I'm confused by Codytaku -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-06-02, 00:56
- Journalism doesn't have to be "good" to be journalism. - CruelLEGACEY, 2016-06-01, 15:39
- I'm confused about Kotaku. - cheapLEY, 2016-06-02, 14:41
- I'm confused by Codytaku -
someotherguy,
2016-06-01, 15:31
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-01, 15:20
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Vortech,
2016-06-01, 19:48
- I'd read a magazine only about vans. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-01, 20:54
- Dunno - ZackDark, 2016-06-01, 22:31
- White, windowless, and unmarked, I assume? - Vortech, 2016-06-01, 22:40
- I'd read a magazine only about vans. - cheapLEY, 2016-06-01, 23:09
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-02, 16:40
- Thank you for this. -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 16:44
- Thank you for this. -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-02, 16:50
- Thank you for this. -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 18:12
- And thank YOU for that... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-06-02, 20:20
- And thank YOU for that... -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-02, 20:21
- And thank YOU for that... -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 20:31
- And thank YOU for that... -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-02, 20:41
- And thank YOU for that... -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 21:13
- And thank YOU for that... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-06-02, 21:19
- lol - Claude Errera, 2016-06-02, 21:24
- And thank YOU for that... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-06-02, 21:19
- And thank YOU for that... -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 21:13
- And thank YOU for that... -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-02, 20:41
- And thank YOU for that... -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 20:31
- And thank YOU for that... -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-02, 20:21
- Thank you for this. -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-02, 20:43
- Thank you for this. -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 21:16
- Just in case... -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 21:19
- Just in case... -
CyberKN,
2016-06-02, 21:21
- +1. For the laugh. - Claude Errera, 2016-06-02, 21:25
- Just in case... -
Vortech,
2016-06-02, 21:34
- Just in case... - Claude Errera, 2016-06-02, 22:07
- Just in case... -
CyberKN,
2016-06-02, 21:21
- Just in case... -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 21:19
- Thank you for this. -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 21:16
- And thank YOU for that... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-06-02, 20:20
- Thank you for this. -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 18:12
- Thank you for this. -
Cody Miller,
2016-06-02, 16:50
- I'm confused about Kotaku. - Vortech, 2016-06-02, 19:34
- Thank you for this. -
Claude Errera,
2016-06-02, 16:44
- I'd read a magazine only about vans. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-01, 20:54
- I'm confused about Kotaku. - narcogen, 2016-06-01, 23:16
- The words I'm searching for I can't say because... - Ragashingo, 2016-06-02, 15:03
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Kahzgul,
2016-06-01, 14:45
- What Funk and Speed said - CruelLEGACEY, 2016-06-01, 11:34
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
narcogen,
2016-06-01, 23:15
- I didn't say it was thorough investigative reporting. - Funkmon, 2016-06-02, 08:52
- Y'all have some unexpected definitions of journalism. -
Vortech,
2016-06-02, 19:19
- So does wikipedia, apparently, as well as my J-school profs. - narcogen, 2016-06-03, 03:17
- You know it's bad when this guy ^ gets offended -
Robot Chickens,
2016-06-01, 05:24
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Funkmon,
2016-06-01, 04:32
- Here, let me help: -
CyberKN,
2016-06-01, 02:44
- Here, let me help: - Kahzgul, 2016-06-01, 14:47
- That signal to noise ratio... - someotherguy, 2016-06-01, 15:05
- It is still terrible. - ProbablyLast, 2016-06-01, 02:47
- Kotaku (and Io9, and everything else Gawker Media) -
Durandal,
2016-06-01, 11:02
- Kotaku (and Io9, and everything else Gawker Media) -
Quirel,
2016-06-02, 02:56
- Kotaku (and Io9, and everything else Gawker Media) - Durandal, 2016-06-02, 15:15
- Kotaku (and Io9, and everything else Gawker Media) -
Quirel,
2016-06-02, 02:56
- Kotaku are confusing -
someotherguy,
2016-06-01, 12:47
- Kotaku are confusing -
Xenos,
2016-06-01, 15:45
- "Journalistic Crusade! But also look at dis dog LOLOL" -
someotherguy,
2016-06-01, 15:47
- Also, more amusing than anything... -
Xenos,
2016-06-01, 15:49
- Also, more amusing than anything... - cheapLEY, 2016-06-01, 16:39
- Also, more amusing than anything... -
Xenos,
2016-06-01, 15:49
- "Journalistic Crusade! But also look at dis dog LOLOL" -
someotherguy,
2016-06-01, 15:47
- Kotaku are confusing -
Xenos,
2016-06-01, 15:45
- I'm confused about Kotaku. - Fire Opal, 2016-06-02, 12:58
- I'm confused about Kotaku. -
Speedracer513,
2016-06-01, 01:59