Avatar

People aren't objecting to valid uses of the model (Destiny)

by Kermit @, Raleigh, NC, Monday, October 02, 2017, 08:16 (2689 days ago) @ narcogen

**feels forum rage intensify**

[image]

I know Claude or Kermit (maybe both) have brought up this exact example before :P


If they did, they're wrong.

Or else I forgot the part in the arcade where they charged you $400 for a console cabinet and $60 for a ROM and THEN $0.25 every time you died.

It is a disingenuous reframing of the argument to say people object to microtransactions.

People mostly object to microtransactions in full priced titles, or titles that are not free, freemium, etc.

The last thing I remember posting anything related was the story about my scheme to get out of paying for my arcade gaming.

I'm not very ideological on this question, and I don't necessarily see it as an either/or question, the way you're framing it, narc. If there's some equity between the money made through microtransactions (that are trivial to the experience of the game) and ongoing improvements to a living game like Destiny, then I'm more or less okay with it. So far Bungie hasn't offended me, and they have made like Claudia Black a little less.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread