data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0d2d/d0d2da05a9d231b4ab778ea29a0bd4d206db4032" alt="Avatar"
I've been thinking about this as well. (Destiny)
My thoughts here are no where near organized or coherent by any means. But I have had this on my mind since launch.
I've played a TON of destiny and I'm quickly approaching the magical number of 2080 hours played in game. That's a whole year of work at a normal 9-5 job. Not sure how I still have a career, girlfriend, life, etc... with that much play time in.
When RoI dropped I picked up 2300 silver to drop into radiant packages and get some of the weapon ornaments along with whatever else I managed to get. I really dislike the RNG+Real Money system in general. Instead of paying $20 to play the lottery, I'd rather just pony up $5 for a weapon skin that I love and be guaranteed that one. In fact, I'd probably pay more money this way then I will with purchasing packages. I don't mind the cosmetic stuff being available for real world money.
With that 2300 silver I picked up 11 Radiant Packages from Eververse. I'm guessing that the ornaments are heavily weighted towards new weapons compared to others. I don't have the exact break down of what I got. but Here's what I still have:
From purchased packages:
- 3 Iron Ornaments
- 2 different skins for the trespasser. (dismantled a 3rd)
- 2 Invective skins of the same type (dismantled 2nd)
- 2 different Nemesis Star Skins.
- 2 Khvostov skins of the same type (dismantled 2nd)
- 1 Telesto skin
- 1 Zhalo Supercell skin
From dropped packages:
- 1 Nemesis Star (duplicate)
- 1 Khvostov skin (duplicate)
Silver Dust Purchases:
- Monochrome Artifact
- Silver Dust to add skins to weapons
I'm not a fan of the system in general. I do appreciate the extra cosmetic stuff being available, I just HATE that it's still RNG based. That's just lazy/bad/punishing design for your players that typically love this game. I'd be fine with the RNG based reward packages if they actually allowed you to straight out buy the ornaments you want and then leave the random weekly ones up to a rng based package.
Some things I'd like to see:
- Purchase ornaments directly instead of RNG. Like emotes are now.
- Give back silver dust/ornaments if you dismantle a piece of gear with them applied.
- RNG based packages as rewards.
Complete thread:
- Let's Talk Silver Dust -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 12:37
- Addendum -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 12:48
- I've been thinking about this as well. -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 14:29
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 14:37
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 13:38
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
Xenos,
2016-10-06, 13:41
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 13:58
- Pro-Tip for Emote Collector's - unoudid, 2016-10-06, 14:54
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 13:58
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
Xenos,
2016-10-06, 13:41
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 13:38
- I've been thinking about this as well. -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 15:48
- I've been thinking about this as well. - unoudid, 2016-10-05, 16:17
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 14:37
- I've been thinking about this as well. -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 14:29
- Let's Talk Silver Dust -
Revenant1988,
2016-10-05, 14:59
- I H8 U -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 15:15
- You can have mine! -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- RNG would make so much more sense if there were trading... -
ObsidianKitteh,
2016-10-05, 15:35
- RNG would make so much more sense if there were trading... - Grizzlei, 2016-10-05, 15:38
- OTOH, that is exactly where my line is for being bothered.
- Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:33
- That would be awesome :(
- unoudid, 2016-10-05, 15:48
- RNG would make so much more sense if there were trading... -
ObsidianKitteh,
2016-10-05, 15:35
- You can have mine! -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- I H8 U -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 15:15
- Meh.
- Funkmon, 2016-10-05, 15:02
- What's wrong with this view... -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 15:27
- What's wrong with this view... -
MacAddictXIV,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 15:40
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass - ObsidianKitteh, 2016-10-05, 15:44
- Note that time is not unlimited... -
slycrel,
2016-10-05, 16:12
- Note that time is not unlimited... - Kahzgul, 2016-10-05, 17:53
- Me, as another example.
- Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:35
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 16:14
- If the movie stinks, Just don't go. - Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:47
- You could be right, but if so it's been poorly communicated -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 17:42
- Real world examples -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 20:58
- Real world examples -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:08
- Real world examples - Harmanimus, 2016-10-06, 16:26
- Real world examples -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:08
- Real world examples -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 20:58
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 14:17
- +1 -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 14:31
- +1 -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 14:36
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:10
- Feels reductive. -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-06, 16:18
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:32
- Feels reductive. -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 17:13
- Feels reductive. - Harmanimus, 2016-10-06, 18:18
- Feels reductive. -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 17:13
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:32
- I wish I could still feel joy.
- Funkmon, 2016-10-06, 16:28
- Great news then! You can get joy for the low cost of 1.99$!
- Harmanimus, 2016-10-06, 16:33
- I thought it was $200 down at the shady corner to feel Joy?
- unoudid, 2016-10-06, 16:54
- Wow, Joy is expensive. -
Claude Errera,
2016-10-06, 16:55
- "Worth" it though. It's a gift that keep on giving
- unoudid, 2016-10-06, 16:57
- "Worth" it though. It's a gift that keep on giving
- Wow, Joy is expensive. -
Claude Errera,
2016-10-06, 16:55
- Bundle deal with Pride for just a dollar more at the Kroger. - Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:51
- I thought it was $200 down at the shady corner to feel Joy?
- Great news then! You can get joy for the low cost of 1.99$!
- About blind boxes -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 16:52
- About blind boxes -
cheapLEY,
2016-10-06, 17:09
- About blind boxes - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 17:17
- About blind boxes -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 18:22
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-06, 19:21
- About blind boxes -
Ragashingo,
2016-10-06, 19:37
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-07, 09:52
- ...
- Ragashingo, 2016-10-07, 10:56
- ...
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-07, 09:52
- About blind boxes -
Ragashingo,
2016-10-06, 19:37
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-06, 19:21
- About blind boxes -
cheapLEY,
2016-10-06, 17:09
- Feels reductive. -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-06, 16:18
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:10
- +1 -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 14:36
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass - Earendil, 2016-10-06, 14:38
- +1 -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 14:31
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 15:40
- It goes against the idea of "everybody should think like me" -
Funkmon,
2016-10-05, 20:28
- Ah, there you are -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 20:59
- Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? -
Funkmon,
2016-10-05, 23:37
- The curse of thread-form forum posts, I guess -
someotherguy,
2016-10-06, 07:38
- "and Guardian, you make one hell of a wrench"
- Pyromancy, 2016-10-06, 07:54
- "and Guardian, you make one hell of a wrench"
- The curse of thread-form forum posts, I guess -
someotherguy,
2016-10-06, 07:38
- Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? -
Funkmon,
2016-10-05, 23:37
- Ah, there you are -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 20:59
- What's wrong with this view... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-10-05, 20:33
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-05, 20:52
- What's wrong with this view... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-10-05, 21:06
- What's wrong with this view... - marmot 1333, 2016-10-06, 16:25
- What's wrong with this view... -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:14
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-06, 16:27
- I got a Legendary too - someotherguy, 2016-10-06, 17:42
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-06, 16:27
- What's wrong with this view... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-10-05, 21:06
- +1
- someotherguy, 2016-10-05, 21:13
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-05, 20:52
- What's wrong with this view... -
MacAddictXIV,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Schedonnardus,
2016-10-05, 17:35
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:21
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Korny,
2016-10-05, 18:25
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:37
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 18:42
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 19:44
- I fail to see how this is relevant -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 19:51
- + 1
- Speedracer513, 2016-10-05, 20:15
- I fail to see how this is relevant -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 20:55
- So there was no relevance -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:19
- So there was no relevance -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 21:22
- Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:37
- Yeah, I'm definitely using that now
- ZackDark, 2016-10-06, 01:13
- Yeah, I'm definitely using that now
- You know, people didn't like it much then either… - Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:59
- Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:37
- So there was no relevance -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 21:22
- So there was no relevance -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:19
- + 1
- I fail to see how this is relevant -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 19:51
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 19:44
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
Speedracer513,
2016-10-05, 19:11
- haha so true! - slycrel, 2016-10-05, 19:32
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
bluerunner,
2016-10-05, 22:19
- my normal reaction ^
- Kermit, 2016-10-06, 07:02
- my normal reaction ^
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
cheapLEY,
2016-10-05, 23:20
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-05, 23:54
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
bluerunner,
2016-10-06, 00:20
- Trust me, 100% of the time... - SonofMacPhisto, 2016-10-06, 10:00
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
bluerunner,
2016-10-06, 00:20
- He's not wrong
- someotherguy, 2016-10-06, 07:43
- +1 - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:28
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-05, 23:54
- ...but why?
- Pyromancy, 2016-10-06, 01:04
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? - Korny, 2016-10-05, 19:37
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 18:42
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:37
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) -
Ragashingo,
2016-10-05, 18:42
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) -
Schedonnardus,
2016-10-05, 19:22
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:31
- Has anyone checked the nearest tree?
- CruelLEGACEY, 2016-10-05, 20:28
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) -
Schedonnardus,
2016-10-05, 19:22
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:25
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Korny,
2016-10-05, 18:25
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:21
- Let's Talk Silver Dust -
ProbablyLast,
2016-10-05, 21:41
- Let's Talk Silver Dust - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:35
- Addendum -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 12:48