You could be right, but if so it's been poorly communicated (Destiny)
I actually can't fault your argument, but I feel like there's been a communication error if that's the intention, because I don't know anyone else who feels that way.
Perhaps it's the lack of real-world analogues (at least, I can't think of anything), or that you have to go through the official sony and Microsoft storefronts in order to make a purchase, or because that's not how people are used to making in-game purchases, or a combination of all three, but I don't feel like that's the way it's being sold to you.
To me at least, it's sold as a mystery box. A purchaseable random item, because random is fun and exciting. If the intention is that it's just your weekly one, but you're "skipping ahead" as it were, that's been poorly communicated.
Of course, it's functionally identical really. But there are definitely people buying them as mystery boxes regardless, and those are the people who are losing out whether by accident or design.
Complete thread:
- Let's Talk Silver Dust -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 12:37
- Addendum -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 12:48
- I've been thinking about this as well. -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 14:29
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 14:37
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 13:38
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
Xenos,
2016-10-06, 13:41
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 13:58
- Pro-Tip for Emote Collector's - unoudid, 2016-10-06, 14:54
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 13:58
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
Xenos,
2016-10-06, 13:41
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 13:38
- I've been thinking about this as well. -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 15:48
- I've been thinking about this as well. - unoudid, 2016-10-05, 16:17
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 14:37
- I've been thinking about this as well. -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 14:29
- Let's Talk Silver Dust -
Revenant1988,
2016-10-05, 14:59
- I H8 U -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 15:15
- You can have mine! -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- RNG would make so much more sense if there were trading... -
ObsidianKitteh,
2016-10-05, 15:35
- RNG would make so much more sense if there were trading... - Grizzlei, 2016-10-05, 15:38
- OTOH, that is exactly where my line is for being bothered.
- Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:33
- That would be awesome :(
- unoudid, 2016-10-05, 15:48
- RNG would make so much more sense if there were trading... -
ObsidianKitteh,
2016-10-05, 15:35
- You can have mine! -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- I H8 U -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 15:15
- Meh.
- Funkmon, 2016-10-05, 15:02
- What's wrong with this view... -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 15:27
- What's wrong with this view... -
MacAddictXIV,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 15:40
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass - ObsidianKitteh, 2016-10-05, 15:44
- Note that time is not unlimited... -
slycrel,
2016-10-05, 16:12
- Note that time is not unlimited... - Kahzgul, 2016-10-05, 17:53
- Me, as another example.
- Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:35
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 16:14
- If the movie stinks, Just don't go. - Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:47
- You could be right, but if so it's been poorly communicated -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 17:42
- Real world examples -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 20:58
- Real world examples -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:08
- Real world examples - Harmanimus, 2016-10-06, 16:26
- Real world examples -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:08
- Real world examples -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 20:58
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 14:17
- +1 -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 14:31
- +1 -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 14:36
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:10
- Feels reductive. -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-06, 16:18
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:32
- Feels reductive. -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 17:13
- Feels reductive. - Harmanimus, 2016-10-06, 18:18
- Feels reductive. -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 17:13
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:32
- I wish I could still feel joy.
- Funkmon, 2016-10-06, 16:28
- Great news then! You can get joy for the low cost of 1.99$!
- Harmanimus, 2016-10-06, 16:33
- I thought it was $200 down at the shady corner to feel Joy?
- unoudid, 2016-10-06, 16:54
- Wow, Joy is expensive. -
Claude Errera,
2016-10-06, 16:55
- "Worth" it though. It's a gift that keep on giving
- unoudid, 2016-10-06, 16:57
- "Worth" it though. It's a gift that keep on giving
- Wow, Joy is expensive. -
Claude Errera,
2016-10-06, 16:55
- Bundle deal with Pride for just a dollar more at the Kroger. - Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:51
- I thought it was $200 down at the shady corner to feel Joy?
- Great news then! You can get joy for the low cost of 1.99$!
- About blind boxes -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 16:52
- About blind boxes -
cheapLEY,
2016-10-06, 17:09
- About blind boxes - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 17:17
- About blind boxes -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 18:22
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-06, 19:21
- About blind boxes -
Ragashingo,
2016-10-06, 19:37
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-07, 09:52
- ...
- Ragashingo, 2016-10-07, 10:56
- ...
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-07, 09:52
- About blind boxes -
Ragashingo,
2016-10-06, 19:37
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-06, 19:21
- About blind boxes -
cheapLEY,
2016-10-06, 17:09
- Feels reductive. -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-06, 16:18
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:10
- +1 -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 14:36
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass - Earendil, 2016-10-06, 14:38
- +1 -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 14:31
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 15:40
- It goes against the idea of "everybody should think like me" -
Funkmon,
2016-10-05, 20:28
- Ah, there you are -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 20:59
- Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? -
Funkmon,
2016-10-05, 23:37
- The curse of thread-form forum posts, I guess -
someotherguy,
2016-10-06, 07:38
- "and Guardian, you make one hell of a wrench"
- Pyromancy, 2016-10-06, 07:54
- "and Guardian, you make one hell of a wrench"
- The curse of thread-form forum posts, I guess -
someotherguy,
2016-10-06, 07:38
- Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? -
Funkmon,
2016-10-05, 23:37
- Ah, there you are -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 20:59
- What's wrong with this view... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-10-05, 20:33
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-05, 20:52
- What's wrong with this view... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-10-05, 21:06
- What's wrong with this view... - marmot 1333, 2016-10-06, 16:25
- What's wrong with this view... -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:14
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-06, 16:27
- I got a Legendary too - someotherguy, 2016-10-06, 17:42
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-06, 16:27
- What's wrong with this view... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-10-05, 21:06
- +1
- someotherguy, 2016-10-05, 21:13
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-05, 20:52
- What's wrong with this view... -
MacAddictXIV,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Schedonnardus,
2016-10-05, 17:35
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:21
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Korny,
2016-10-05, 18:25
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:37
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 18:42
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 19:44
- I fail to see how this is relevant -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 19:51
- + 1
- Speedracer513, 2016-10-05, 20:15
- I fail to see how this is relevant -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 20:55
- So there was no relevance -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:19
- So there was no relevance -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 21:22
- Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:37
- Yeah, I'm definitely using that now
- ZackDark, 2016-10-06, 01:13
- Yeah, I'm definitely using that now
- You know, people didn't like it much then either… - Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:59
- Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:37
- So there was no relevance -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 21:22
- So there was no relevance -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:19
- + 1
- I fail to see how this is relevant -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 19:51
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 19:44
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
Speedracer513,
2016-10-05, 19:11
- haha so true! - slycrel, 2016-10-05, 19:32
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
bluerunner,
2016-10-05, 22:19
- my normal reaction ^
- Kermit, 2016-10-06, 07:02
- my normal reaction ^
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
cheapLEY,
2016-10-05, 23:20
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-05, 23:54
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
bluerunner,
2016-10-06, 00:20
- Trust me, 100% of the time... - SonofMacPhisto, 2016-10-06, 10:00
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
bluerunner,
2016-10-06, 00:20
- He's not wrong
- someotherguy, 2016-10-06, 07:43
- +1 - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:28
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-05, 23:54
- ...but why?
- Pyromancy, 2016-10-06, 01:04
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? - Korny, 2016-10-05, 19:37
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 18:42
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:37
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) -
Ragashingo,
2016-10-05, 18:42
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) -
Schedonnardus,
2016-10-05, 19:22
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:31
- Has anyone checked the nearest tree?
- CruelLEGACEY, 2016-10-05, 20:28
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) -
Schedonnardus,
2016-10-05, 19:22
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:25
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Korny,
2016-10-05, 18:25
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:21
- Let's Talk Silver Dust -
ProbablyLast,
2016-10-05, 21:41
- Let's Talk Silver Dust - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:35
- Addendum -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 12:48