data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0d2d/d0d2da05a9d231b4ab778ea29a0bd4d206db4032" alt="Avatar"
Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass (Destiny)
Maybe I'm missing something. As a non paying player I can easily acquire a radiant treasure every week. RNG on the content still applies.
Alternatively, I can buy a radiant treasure with money, and afaik the same RNG applies.You pay to not have to wait, or not have to play as much.
So, I can understand if still dealing with RNG makes things more expensive than some people would like, but remember that you're paying to bypass time, nothing else.
With 100% Perfect RNG on your side it will take you 22 weeks of playing in order to get every weapon skin currently in the game. That's a long time, but theoretically you can get everything in that amount of time.
we currently have a few options for these ornaments:
- one per week per account as a reward for doing the weekly crucible playlist
- purchase a radiant treasure for $2 (200 Silver)
- Buy from Xur with silver dust (don't remember the cost)
The best case scenario currently for the quickest method to get all of the ornaments is you could have bought 21 packages ($42) and gotten the other one via your rewards package. Since RNG is pretty horrific over the course of destiny in order to get what you want, this case will 99.9% never happen. It's a statistical anomaly if that would actually happen.
When you add in RNG for getting the ornaments of iron also, the progress just gets pushed out even more.
The other problem with these packages is that these items are one time use only. you dismantle something... then too bad. No silver dust, no returning of the ornament to the vault..... nothing. That money you spent for cosmetic stuff is now null and void with nothing to show. It's simply money down the drain (even more than before with buying packages)
This whole system shows a complete lack of respect for the players time/money by continually forcing multiple levels of RNG on a person in order to get an item in game.
If they insist on keeping RNG for these, then they could add an in game system to allow you a chance to reroll your ornament. 1 Ornament + 3 legendary marks per reroll would be acceptable.
Complete thread:
- Let's Talk Silver Dust -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 12:37
- Addendum -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 12:48
- I've been thinking about this as well. -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 14:29
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 14:37
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 13:38
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
Xenos,
2016-10-06, 13:41
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 13:58
- Pro-Tip for Emote Collector's - unoudid, 2016-10-06, 14:54
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 13:58
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
Xenos,
2016-10-06, 13:41
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 13:38
- I've been thinking about this as well. -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 15:48
- I've been thinking about this as well. - unoudid, 2016-10-05, 16:17
- Purchase Ornaments Directly -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 14:37
- I've been thinking about this as well. -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 14:29
- Let's Talk Silver Dust -
Revenant1988,
2016-10-05, 14:59
- I H8 U -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 15:15
- You can have mine! -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- RNG would make so much more sense if there were trading... -
ObsidianKitteh,
2016-10-05, 15:35
- RNG would make so much more sense if there were trading... - Grizzlei, 2016-10-05, 15:38
- OTOH, that is exactly where my line is for being bothered.
- Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:33
- That would be awesome :(
- unoudid, 2016-10-05, 15:48
- RNG would make so much more sense if there were trading... -
ObsidianKitteh,
2016-10-05, 15:35
- You can have mine! -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- I H8 U -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 15:15
- Meh.
- Funkmon, 2016-10-05, 15:02
- What's wrong with this view... -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 15:27
- What's wrong with this view... -
MacAddictXIV,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 15:40
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass - ObsidianKitteh, 2016-10-05, 15:44
- Note that time is not unlimited... -
slycrel,
2016-10-05, 16:12
- Note that time is not unlimited... - Kahzgul, 2016-10-05, 17:53
- Me, as another example.
- Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:35
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
unoudid,
2016-10-05, 16:14
- If the movie stinks, Just don't go. - Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:47
- You could be right, but if so it's been poorly communicated -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 17:42
- Real world examples -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 20:58
- Real world examples -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:08
- Real world examples - Harmanimus, 2016-10-06, 16:26
- Real world examples -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:08
- Real world examples -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 20:58
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 14:17
- +1 -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 14:31
- +1 -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 14:36
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:10
- Feels reductive. -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-06, 16:18
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:32
- Feels reductive. -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 17:13
- Feels reductive. - Harmanimus, 2016-10-06, 18:18
- Feels reductive. -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 17:13
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:32
- I wish I could still feel joy.
- Funkmon, 2016-10-06, 16:28
- Great news then! You can get joy for the low cost of 1.99$!
- Harmanimus, 2016-10-06, 16:33
- I thought it was $200 down at the shady corner to feel Joy?
- unoudid, 2016-10-06, 16:54
- Wow, Joy is expensive. -
Claude Errera,
2016-10-06, 16:55
- "Worth" it though. It's a gift that keep on giving
- unoudid, 2016-10-06, 16:57
- "Worth" it though. It's a gift that keep on giving
- Wow, Joy is expensive. -
Claude Errera,
2016-10-06, 16:55
- Bundle deal with Pride for just a dollar more at the Kroger. - Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:51
- I thought it was $200 down at the shady corner to feel Joy?
- Great news then! You can get joy for the low cost of 1.99$!
- About blind boxes -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 16:52
- About blind boxes -
cheapLEY,
2016-10-06, 17:09
- About blind boxes - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 17:17
- About blind boxes -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 18:22
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-06, 19:21
- About blind boxes -
Ragashingo,
2016-10-06, 19:37
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-07, 09:52
- ...
- Ragashingo, 2016-10-07, 10:56
- ...
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-07, 09:52
- About blind boxes -
Ragashingo,
2016-10-06, 19:37
- About blind boxes -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-06, 19:21
- About blind boxes -
cheapLEY,
2016-10-06, 17:09
- Feels reductive. -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-06, 16:18
- Feels reductive. -
Harmanimus,
2016-10-06, 16:10
- +1 -
stabbim,
2016-10-06, 14:36
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass - Earendil, 2016-10-06, 14:38
- +1 -
unoudid,
2016-10-06, 14:31
- Your trade money for time, not RNG bypass -
Earendil,
2016-10-05, 15:40
- It goes against the idea of "everybody should think like me" -
Funkmon,
2016-10-05, 20:28
- Ah, there you are -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 20:59
- Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? -
Funkmon,
2016-10-05, 23:37
- The curse of thread-form forum posts, I guess -
someotherguy,
2016-10-06, 07:38
- "and Guardian, you make one hell of a wrench"
- Pyromancy, 2016-10-06, 07:54
- "and Guardian, you make one hell of a wrench"
- The curse of thread-form forum posts, I guess -
someotherguy,
2016-10-06, 07:38
- Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? -
Funkmon,
2016-10-05, 23:37
- Ah, there you are -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 20:59
- What's wrong with this view... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-10-05, 20:33
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-05, 20:52
- What's wrong with this view... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-10-05, 21:06
- What's wrong with this view... - marmot 1333, 2016-10-06, 16:25
- What's wrong with this view... -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:14
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-06, 16:27
- I got a Legendary too - someotherguy, 2016-10-06, 17:42
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-06, 16:27
- What's wrong with this view... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-10-05, 21:06
- +1
- someotherguy, 2016-10-05, 21:13
- What's wrong with this view... -
marmot 1333,
2016-10-05, 20:52
- What's wrong with this view... -
MacAddictXIV,
2016-10-05, 15:31
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Schedonnardus,
2016-10-05, 17:35
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:21
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Korny,
2016-10-05, 18:25
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:37
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 18:42
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 19:44
- I fail to see how this is relevant -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 19:51
- + 1
- Speedracer513, 2016-10-05, 20:15
- I fail to see how this is relevant -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 20:55
- So there was no relevance -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:19
- So there was no relevance -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 21:22
- Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:37
- Yeah, I'm definitely using that now
- ZackDark, 2016-10-06, 01:13
- Yeah, I'm definitely using that now
- You know, people didn't like it much then either… - Vortech, 2016-10-06, 20:59
- Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:37
- So there was no relevance -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 21:22
- So there was no relevance -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 21:19
- + 1
- I fail to see how this is relevant -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 19:51
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 19:44
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
Speedracer513,
2016-10-05, 19:11
- haha so true! - slycrel, 2016-10-05, 19:32
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
bluerunner,
2016-10-05, 22:19
- my normal reaction ^
- Kermit, 2016-10-06, 07:02
- my normal reaction ^
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
cheapLEY,
2016-10-05, 23:20
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-05, 23:54
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
bluerunner,
2016-10-06, 00:20
- Trust me, 100% of the time... - SonofMacPhisto, 2016-10-06, 10:00
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
bluerunner,
2016-10-06, 00:20
- He's not wrong
- someotherguy, 2016-10-06, 07:43
- +1 - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:28
- Trust me, 100% of the time... -
SonofMacPhisto,
2016-10-05, 23:54
- ...but why?
- Pyromancy, 2016-10-06, 01:04
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? - Korny, 2016-10-05, 19:37
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Grizzlei,
2016-10-05, 18:42
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:37
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) -
Ragashingo,
2016-10-05, 18:42
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) -
Schedonnardus,
2016-10-05, 19:22
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:31
- Has anyone checked the nearest tree?
- CruelLEGACEY, 2016-10-05, 20:28
- Yeah... Something's up! I'm calling hostage rescue... :) -
Schedonnardus,
2016-10-05, 19:22
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:25
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Korny,
2016-10-05, 18:25
- A micro-transaction thread w/o Cody? -
Cody Miller,
2016-10-05, 18:21
- Let's Talk Silver Dust -
ProbablyLast,
2016-10-05, 21:41
- Let's Talk Silver Dust - stabbim, 2016-10-06, 14:35
- Addendum -
someotherguy,
2016-10-05, 12:48