Because I have to and it's relevant (Criticism)
My guess is the problem is related to the API, but if it's really impossible, that still doesn't help my postmaster being full of shaders.
I think the problem is that it's really easy to fix, but it's also really easy to break a lot of other systems in the process. So the hardest part is actually make sure nothing else breaks.
I wonder if they could do the same fix that Guerilla did for Horizon Zero Dawn (even if it's a temporary solution). Rather than buying stacks, the longer you held down the button, the faster you'd buy them. In seconds, you'd have a steady stream of a resource being added to your inventory.I wonder if the same process could be used to delete shaders.
Even if we can't delete them in bulk, it would save so much time for them to reduce the time to hold the button down to half a second. Honestly, I'd love to see reduced time-to-hold across the board.
That seems... tricky. I feel like they have X amount of seconds to delete anything right? I don't think they have any instant deleting of items. If they did, it might be easier to just set it to that. Maybe. It's so hard to say without seeing the code.
Complete thread:
- We can't just fix it -
Cody Miller,
2018-01-21, 09:19
- They had this fixed in D1 - unoudid, 2018-01-21, 10:21
- We can't just fix it - Vortech, 2018-01-21, 11:13
- We can't just fix it - stabbim, 2018-01-21, 12:10
- Is that the support beam to the house! -
INSANEdrive,
2018-01-21, 12:15
- Is that the support beam to the house! - EffortlessFury, 2018-01-21, 14:33
- I don't care. - ManKitten, 2018-01-21, 20:10
- We can't just fix it - FyreWulff, 2018-01-21, 20:31
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
MacAddictXIV,
2018-01-22, 07:12
- Because I have to and it's relevant - stabbim, 2018-01-22, 07:34
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
squidnh3,
2018-01-22, 08:03
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
MacAddictXIV,
2018-01-22, 08:12
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
Korny,
2018-01-22, 08:34
- Because I have to and it's relevant - MacAddictXIV, 2018-01-22, 10:49
- Always a safe assumption. - Kermit, 2018-01-22, 08:34
- Because I have to and it's relevant - squidnh3, 2018-01-22, 09:16
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
Korny,
2018-01-22, 08:34
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
MacAddictXIV,
2018-01-22, 08:12
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
Cody Miller,
2018-01-22, 08:31
- As Cortana once said: -
breitzen,
2018-01-22, 08:36
- As Cortana once said: -
Cody Miller,
2018-01-22, 08:37
- As Cortana once said: -
MacAddictXIV,
2018-01-22, 08:43
- As Cortana once said: -
Cody Miller,
2018-01-22, 08:49
- As Cortana once said: - MacAddictXIV, 2018-01-22, 09:01
- As Cortana once said: - stabbim, 2018-01-22, 09:55
- As Cortana once said: -
Cody Miller,
2018-01-22, 08:49
- As Cortana once said: -
MacAddictXIV,
2018-01-22, 08:43
- As Cortana once said: -
Cody Miller,
2018-01-22, 08:37
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
MacAddictXIV,
2018-01-22, 08:40
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
Cody Miller,
2018-01-22, 08:46
- Because I have to and it's relevant - MacAddictXIV, 2018-01-22, 08:58
- Because I have to and it's relevant - stabbim, 2018-01-22, 10:01
- Because I have to and it's relevant - dogcow, 2018-01-22, 10:14
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
Cody Miller,
2018-01-22, 08:46
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
squidnh3,
2018-01-22, 09:27
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
MacAddictXIV,
2018-01-22, 09:50
- Twitter is also not the ideal platform for depth. -
Harmanimus,
2018-01-22, 11:41
- Twitter is also not the ideal platform for depth. -
cheapLEY,
2018-01-22, 11:51
- It's got its benefits and drawbacks. - Harmanimus, 2018-01-22, 12:03
- Twitter is also not the ideal platform for depth. -
cheapLEY,
2018-01-22, 11:51
- Twitter is also not the ideal platform for depth. -
Harmanimus,
2018-01-22, 11:41
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
Tails,
2018-01-22, 13:13
- +10 - MacAddictXIV, 2018-01-22, 13:15
- Because I have to and it's relevant -
MacAddictXIV,
2018-01-22, 09:50
- As Cortana once said: -
breitzen,
2018-01-22, 08:36