Avatar

Better cosmetic than pay-to-win (Destiny)

by Speedracer513 @, Dallas, Texas, Tuesday, June 23, 2015, 14:58 (3536 days ago) @ someotherguy

But even better to have neither.

I'll disagree.

Absolutely, pay-to-win is bad - and totally warrants any community backlash.

However, having microtransactions for purely cosmetic items is not only a perfectly reasonable business strategy, but it offers a pure free-market habitat where people that want shiny things can get their shiny things and the creators of those shiny things get compensated for the value of their art. People that don't want the shiny things (that don't affect their game at all) can continue to ignore the side market. I fail to see a loser in this scenario. That said, I am very interested to hear counter-arguments and reasons/examples where cosmetic transactions are harmful.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread