That's not the important part. (Destiny)

by Ragashingo , Official DBO Cryptarch, Sunday, June 07, 2015, 16:52 (3502 days ago) @ Funkmon

I definitely wasn't. Also, remember, you were not arguing that a change happened, but arguing that a specific change happened, the point of which was that the slope increased. I never insisted it didn't change, ever, once. You're reading into it. So, while your text was technically correct in that you only explicitly stated 33s were more disadvantaged, nothing I said was incorrect, I just expressed doubt, and I still, right now, doubt that deeJ was saying anything but explaining that the curve wasn't arithmetic. The curves are functionally identical, but specifically, down to about 3 levels one gives more advantage, then the other gives more for the rest, which says to me it's less severe. That said, you were right about levels close in. I did not know that's all you were trying to say. The rest of what you said caused me to infer you were talking about the whole damage curve. It may have been a misunderstanding. I don't want to talk about that anymore. It's in another thread and it's over.

Hold on. You said flat out that: "If he wanted to say it was different, surely he would have used words that actually implied difference..."How you can say that and then claim you were merely talking about the arithmetic nature of the curve is beyond me. It comes right up to the point of outright lying. I also strongly disagree that I wasn't arguing that a change happened. I didn't post screenshots of a change list, without mentioning the curve, and find secondary sources of hotfix notes, without mentioning the curve, because I disagree on the exact nature of the curve! I did so because I took issue with you saying there was no change.

Everyone plays the game differently. To ask that this point be conceded is unnecessary. So I didn't. How would you feel if I said "here's the part where you admit some people play Destiny's Crucible for fun and NOT competition."

To me, it now is necessary for you because you seem completely incapable of admitting others have a point across multiple threads. As for your question, I would immediately admit that sure, of course some people play for fun and not competition. I have no problem admitting when people have valid points.

I saw you ask me a question and I answered it, plus with some fun hypothetical quotes and reasoning. This is almost the definition of give and take in a conversational sense. That said, I will leave you alone if you want, but I can categorically 100% confirm that if I have something to talk about in regards to a post you made on this forum, I will say it and have no qualms.

No. In give and take you give and take. All you do is take. You never admit you are wrong. You never acknowledge someone else has a point. Not until people have to press you on the issue over and over. Even then you just give a half admission while claiming that you were still right all along. Others have called you on this before. I welcome you replying to me, but I will call you on it every single time if you keep up this stubborn refusal to acknowledge others' points of view and keep lying about what you said just so you won't be wrong.